Search Results: incest

What's your definition and which of my definition fits you most (poll)?

My definitions:

Pro-choice: Don't necessary see abortion as positive, necessarily or negative. They may think it depends from case to case, but believes it's not their business and that women should be allowed to choose by themselves.

Pro-abortion: Are also for legalization of self-determined abortions, but thinks abortions can affect the society positively.

Both pro-abortionists and pro-choicers believes it's up to the woman, but pro-abortionists sees abortion as a more positive thing. E. g. less disabled and poor people in the world because they gets aborted away.

General pro-life: Are against legalization of self-determined abortions and thinks abortions in general speaking should be illegal and is immoral. But thinks some exceptions are okay like if the mother's health and life is in danger or a child is pregnant. If a child is pregnant, the parents and other adults should be held responsible.

I don't consider people who supports abortion in rape and incest cases as general pro-life.

Total pro-life: Against legalization of any kinds of abortions.

Half pro-life: Thinks abortion is okay when it's incest or rape. May also have other exception rules like general pro-lifers. They thinks other types of abortion are immoral, but some of them thinks it exists other solutions on the problem than making it illegal by law. They've often similar views on it as cheating.

#ProLife #ProChoice #Abortion

I'm general pro-life.
Why I'm Pro-Life & My Answers To Pro-Choice Arguments

The Windsor's have no real political power but still have servants.

Liberals in the United States are constantly saying that we should be more like Europe. Well when it comes to abortion laws, in most of the countries in Europe, the choice cutoff is between 12 weeks and 20 weeks. In Australia and Japan, the choice cutoff is 22 weeks, 6 days (basically 23 weeks). In all of these mentioned locations, there are the obvious exceptions baked into the law (rape, incest, mother's health, fetus viability, medical emergency, etcetera) if an abortion is medically and/or legally needed beyond the legal deadlines.

Since Dobbs Versus Jackson overturned Roe Verses Wade, I propose that the House and Senate pass a national law allowing each state to set their own abortion choice laws similar to most of Europe, Australia, and Japan, between 12 weeks and 23 weeks. This way, we avoid having states like Texas that are trying to completely eliminate abortions, and also avoid having states like New Jersey and Oregon where abortions are possible into the 39th week of pregnancy. No states would be less than 12 weeks, and no states would be more than 23 weeks (except in cases of rape, incest, mother's health, fetus viability, medical emergency, etcetera). Abortion medication would remain available and legal in all 50 states, up to each state's specified choice deadline.

For full transparency and disclosure, I'm personally morally pro-life, legally pro-choice, and anti-late-term (3rd trimester) abortion. Basically I would hope that life is chosen in most normal and reasonable circumstances, but fully understand the need for everyone's legal right to choose one or the other, up to a reasonable point. In normal and reasonable circumstances, no normal reasonable logical person needs more than 23 weeks to make a decision.

I believe that this is a fair and reasonable resolution to the reproduction rights debate in the United States. What do all of you think and believe? Vote and post your opinions below!