Search Results: make him like me again

Hey everyone, I've got a question I wanted to get some opinions on. When it comes to recording memories of your kids as they grow up, would you choose an old-school camcorder or a more modern device like an iPhone or iPad?

I've been thinking a lot about this lately, especially as I start to imagine what it will be like when I have kids someday. On one hand, there's something really nostalgic and vintage-feeling about those old camcorder videos from the 90s and 2000s. The picture quality might not be as crisp, but there's a certain charm to that home movie aesthetic.

And I bet it would be so cool to be able to pull out those old camcorder tapes when your kids are older and watch them back together, reliving those precious early moments. Like, how amazing would it be to see your baby self or toddler self on that classic camcorder footage? It just feels so sentimental. You can capture and record the birth of your child, take their first steps, ride their first tricycle, and do those other things.

But then again, the cameras on smartphones and tablets these days are just so advanced. The video quality is amazing; you can shoot in HD or even 4K, and it's just so much more convenient to have that capability right in your pocket. Plus, you can easily edit and share the videos straight from your device.

And let's be real, who really wants to lug around a big, bulky camcorder everywhere? An iPhone or iPad is way more portable and discreet for capturing spontaneous family moments.

So I'm really torn! What do you all think? If you had the option, would you go the vintage camcorder route or stick with a more modern mobile device to record your kids growing up? I'm really curious to hear your perspectives on this!

Looking forward to seeing what you guys have to say. Capturing those special family memories is so important, so I want to make sure I choose the right tool for the job, you know?

My state charges a tax on assets, like cars... I pay a tax every year. I don't like it, but it does fill up the treasury. As well, those whom have more... pay more.

A lot of wealth is held by a few... in corporations, cars, homes, etc.. That wealth could be redistributed and reinvested into public assets which benefit the public. Goal being reduced work hours, social benefit (medical) while maintaining wealth.

Example: Asset tax on Warren Buffet assuming his net worth is 1 Trillion at.1% = $1 billion. Adjust the tax amount as needed, you get the idea. That $ goes into building out robots and AI that replaces human work in corporations. The salary received by the robots/ai goes to public trust distributed for public good... idea being people don't work as much, have time for other things.

Somebody has to do a lot of math, you get the idea...

And yes, leasing would be considered holding an asset. Whether houses are taxed again.. id say no. But Major things, yes.

The problem of course is: Management. Can you really trust your govt to make good decisions. That's where it always falls apart...