Search Results: age to have children

It just got me thinking lately. I am 20 years old now, will turn 21 soon, and when I look around me at the current 18 year old's or even compare myself now to when I was when I was 18, I see a huge difference in mentality. When I was 15-16, I thought 18 year old's were so mature and all that, and when I turned 18 I thought I was all grown up and stuff, but now when I look at them, they seem like such children, even though there is not much difference in years.

Also, at what age would you consider someone an adult generally speaking?

This girl was married to Wladimir Klitschko and had a child for him. During their 9 year marriage she got off on him punching and hurting her. The famous boxer was concern he would accidentally kill her if he continued giving into her demands. Things she would have him do includes: punching her in the face, choking her until she past out, slapping her so hard that she would begin to bleed etc.

She was also horribly abused by her father and forced to perform 'acts' with and for rich hollywood elites at these sex parties at a very young age... and then her parents would actively turn her out to Hollyweirds to secure roles. When she gave birth, she had to go into rehab facility for post natal depression, and then after, her and Wladimir broke up, she began drinking and gave him custody of the baby.

The reason her dad isn't in prison is the same reason a lot of other people in the industry aren't- they have the $$$ to grease palms with and the clout to have it go away. It's a well known fact that the DA, judges, cops, all of them in LA can be bought and sold for the right price (and some of them are even in on it themselves.)

How do you think these celebrities get away with robbery, rape, murder even, and still manage to get these embarrassingly light sentences? How do you think R. Kelly, Harvey Weinstein and the rest of 'em get away with it for so long? Celebrity idolatry and the worship of power and money.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/the-gop-wants-to-implement-medicaid-work-requirements-heres-what-that-means
The GOP wants to implement Medicaid work requirements. Here’s what that means

More than a half million of the poorest Americans could be left without health insurance under legislation passed by House Republicans that would require people to work in exchange for health care coverage through Medicaid.

It’s one of dozens of provisions tucked into a GOP bill that would allow for an increase in the debt limit but curb government spending over the next decade. The bill is unlikely to become law, though. It is being used by House Republicans to draw Democrats to the negotiating table and avoid a debt default.

Democrats have strongly opposed the Medicaid work requirement provision, saying it won’t incentivize people to get a job and will drive up the number of uninsured in the country.

Here’s a look at how the proposal might save taxpayers money but cost some Americans access to health care coverage.
Who would be required to work?

The work requirements say able-bodied adults ages 19 to 55 who don’t have children or other dependents would be required to work, train for a job or perform community service to stay on Medicaid. They would have to put in at least 80 hours a month to stay on the government-sponsored health care coverage.

About 84 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates 15 million would be subject to the requirement. The Health and Human Services Department, however, predicts millions more — about a third of enrollees altogether — would be required to work.
Why are work requirements controversial?

Republicans say the move would help push Americans into jobs that eventually might put them in a position to move off of government aid.