Search Results: should i keep talking to him

i am debating moral codes with a roommate, and he is a subjective truther/subjective morals believer. He keeps doing the "what's right for one might not be right for another." thing.

The First Law of Logic is that The Truth cannot contradict The Truth.

He is trying to claim morals aren't required to be logical, which is preposterous and regarding correcting other peoples lack of morals he's claiming you should just leave them alone and let eeryone do their own thing, quoting Jesus "do unto other as you would have them do unto you' out of context... Jesus and the Bible authors obviosly did not just let people do their own thing. Most of Jesus recorded words is him RANTING against corrupt priests and hypocrissy and other SINS. most of the Old Testament is the authors RANTING against corrupt priests, hypocrissy, SINS, and especially human sacrifice, idolatry, and adultery.

So the Bible authors did not compromise with people's morals, and the First Law of Logic requires that all True Moral Codes are Required to never contradict one another.

I laughed at him, because Jesus said, "Till heaven and Earth pass, not one jot or tittle shall in anywise pass away from the Law until all things are fulfilled."

The Law of Moses that he was talking about is not SUBJECT but rather OBJECTIVE and it does not compromise with anyone.