Search Results: standards

Just what if biologically we evolved to have horns like those herbivores? It tend to be the males who grow horns/antlers. And it would grow during puberty. It could change history, religious beliefs, laws, weaponry, clothings and beauty standards. If it's actually really sharp that can actually impale anyone, I can just imagine guys just cutting them off to turn them into personal knives, spears or arrows. But that would actually make them more dangerous than attractive but let's say if we naturally grow horns but just dull or the not so big ones. Horn salons and products would have been a thing and they would probably be so uncomfortable but I think humanity will just find a way to handle it.

I know earning money is important but there's always a standard set by some random ancestors.

It's fine when men and women do a nude scene in film and they are treated as superstar. But when a random person decides to shoot his or her nudes, it suddenly becomes vulgar.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and other agencies quietly resumed coordinating with the major social media companies earlier this year to fight what government officials warned was a coming onslaught of foreign disinformation and influence operations leading up to the presidential election in November. In at least two instances in recent weeks, the companies have taken action to remove malign content, according to the Biden administration and company officials.

Contacts between F. B. I. investigators and the companies — including Facebook, X and YouTube — ground to a halt last year as a legal challenge that accused the Biden administration of censorship wound its way to the U. S. Supreme Court.

When President Biden came to office, however, the Republican attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana went to court, saying such coordination was part of a sweeping government conspiracy to stifle critical conservative voices online.

After a lower court judge ruled in July 2023 that the accusations at the heart of the case reflected “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history,” the Biden administration suspended virtually all contact with the social media platforms as the appeals process unfolded.

In February, the Department of Justice rewrote its standard operating procedures to clarify when its officials could communicate with social media companies, even before the Supreme Court’s decision, according to the department’s official response to an inspector general report. It posted an outline of the guidelines without fanfare on the F. B. I.’s website on Aug. 1.

The new procedures emphasize that the bureau’s agents cannot exert any pressure on the platforms, leaving it to the companies to decide what to do with information about malign foreign influence operations online. The goal was to deflect the core accusation of the legal challenge: that the government had effectively coerced the platforms to act with threats of retaliation.