Search Results: all we do is argue

Asymmetric romantic attraction is one person has feelings and the other does not. The person who has feelings isn’t thinking clearly because chemicals are (naturally) being released in their brains compromising their judgment. But the other person can see everything as plain as day because they aren’t attracted to them hence little/no brain chemicals.

So person who has no feelings has to make a decision on how to handle a person they have influence over. The moral thing to do is be tactfully honest with the other person (and do it early). But we don’t live in a moral world so the following usually happens:

Scenario #1: Man manipulates the woman into sex when she is thinking there is going to be a relationship. Worst case scenario he gets her pregnant and abandones her.

Scenario #2: Woman manipulated the man into thinking she likes him when she doesn’t. She does this for attention, favors, free meals, free counseling, etc (stereotypical friéndzone).

Worst case scenario is she is a gold digger. Yeah she has to give him up to him at the point but she gets a huge payout for faking it. She will likely divorce him and screw him over in alimony (and she likely cheated during the marriage). She never had feelings for at all. Just a good actress.

Now roles can be reversed at times. Some women do use men only for sex and some men do seek out “suger mamas”. Some men do friéndzone women for their own ends. However for is just not as common. However I will say it is at least biologically natural to want to have sex with someone even if you don’t want a relationship. However using a person for money, ego, attention, favors, etc is downright conceited.

Anyway I got in a long “debate” with a feminist on here who believed that men should be held liable if they mislead a woman into sex. But she had no problem with women taking advantage of men via the friéndzone or worse (gold diggers). Not kidding.

I argue that BOTH genders need to watch out for themselves.

So, there's this stoner theory that in the grand multiverse of our realities, the world WE are all living in, is just a dumping ground for all the bad stuff in every other reality, like some kind of multiverse dumping ground?

This is the new theory going around, and it says that our reality has been sh*tty since 2012 (when the world was originally supposed to end) and every other multiverse is better than this, some even being Utopias, because they dump every bad outcome, historical event, or person, into this one reality.

It explains this Clown World where:

- Joe Biden is US president,

- Russia is at war with Ukraine,

- The Chinese Communist Party and North Korea still exist in the 2020s,

- China is about to become a Superpower, even after unleashing a global pandemic in the 2020s (and somehow wasn't nuked by the world governments for it),

- Socially acceptable bigotry and LGBT degeneracy from idiotic Liberals and retards (known as "Woke culture") is a thing that exists,

- Shamelessness and promiscuity is actively promoted by society and things like drug abuse, polyamory, an-al se-x are common, and not seen as obscene and f*cked-up, and little girls want to grow up to be whores on an amateur po-rn site called OnlyFans,

- Most world governments are Orwellian and the people are so stupid, they happily accept it, as long as "their party" (the political Left or Right) are controlling them,

- Americans and Westerners are still arguing over idiotic political hot button issues like abortion, religion, gay rights, etc., well into the 2020s,

- Most human beings still believe in religion and Islam somehow still exists,

- The mainstream media are all liars and propagandists,

- Elitist billionaires want to literally own the world and outlaw civilians from owning anything and make them eat bugs,

... And so on.

Do you think our reality, on this Earth, is just a multiverse dumping ground for all the bad stuff throughout history, and that we're some kind of super-dystopia?