Search Results: he has moved on

President Joe Biden, reversing an Obama era policy, has agreed to give Ukraine anti-personnel land mines, a move seen as an attempt to slow Russian troops who have been steadily advancing in Ukraine's east in recent months.

With much of the civilian population already evacuated, Ukraine argues that the tactical use of "non-persistent" mines poses minimal risk to civilians and is absolutely essential to stem Russia's advance.

The US "non-persistent" mines differ from Russia's as they become inert after a pre-set period of time. They are electrically fused and require battery power to detonate. Once the battery runs out, they will not detonate.

The Kremlin has vowed to retaliate for the US provision of missiles & now land mines. On Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, setting out new conditions under which the country would consider using its arsenal. It now says an attack from a non-nuclear state, if backed by a nuclear power, will be treated as a joint assault on Russia.

Biden has given authorization for Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia, would you support the supreme court declaring this move unconstitutional as to prevent direct with Russia.

Posted question anonymously so everyone has a chance to answer.