Search Results: user girl sex only

From my brief experience G@G sends out two types of emails:

- Basic What Happened Yesterday? status reports

- Announcements for lack of a better term

We're going to talk about announcements. Usually these have innocuous titles like "Treat Yo Self This Valentine's Day: Enter To Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card‏" and discuss "relevant" MyTakes like Valentine's date ideas or whatever.

That was not the case with today's email that arrived in my inbox. First of all it's titled "Threesomes Examined, What Sort of Sex Makes You Squeal?‏"

Uhhhhhh... that is not workplace appropriate. Does G@G like to conveniently forget that many of their users are not only under 18 but also view their email from work or in public?

The topics featured in this email include:

- Everything You've Wanted To Know About ThreesomesThreesomes.
This take was posted by the GaGTake account and was written off as fap material and largely useless, but G@G is determined to push it I guess.

-Why Rejection Isn't Always A Bad Thing
-Vaginas: Is Yours Normal?
-What Type Of Sex For You?
-The Right Amount Of Time To Date Before Marriage
-10 Signs He Doesn't Care About You
-8 Simple Ways To Eat Healthier
-My Life With Tiny Boobs in 6 Ways
-What Qualities Guys Look For In A Girlfriend
-How Guys Really Feel About High-Maintenance Girls

Okay. So Is it just me or are almost all of these prey on either some sexual topic (NSFW) or insecurities (which is another topic for another day)? Many of them would have also have made a better title. OR G@G could have even gone for a general Takes Of The Week or some other type of newsy title.

SO! Should G@G emails be SFW or is NSFW a-okay with you?

Honestly, I've seen this way too much. Mostly on here.

I'm sure girls on here have done it but I have only seen it from guys thus far.
there's comments from guys saying that you're shallow if you need both physical and mental attraction, and those stupid false dilemma questions: smart but ugly nice guy vs attractive but stupid jerk?

I've even had a guy on here bitch about how girls will only give it up to hot guys (thus depriving him of pussy) and he asked me, "think of all the guys you've banged. All hot right? Point proven."

Well, he's right. Almost all humans in general consent to sex only with those they find physically attractive. But is that really WRONG?
Is it wrong to only date those you find attractive as well?

If attraction is the only thing that matters to you, yes, you're shallow.
But to have to have attraction in order to let romance blossom, that's 100% normal, biological, healthy, logical, etc etc.

Do you think its okay to shame people who say they won't date a person they find unattractive? Do you think people should date those they find unattractive even if they don't want to, just for the sake of fairness? (Which is what a lot of these users are whining about...)

Among the disgusting users out there who obviously use their skills, who has it more easier when taking advantage of the person:

- A guy pretending to be good, make the girl believe he cares deeply about her (a smooth talking and seductor) but only trying to get into her pants... he can also do the virgin hunting thing

- A girl that manages to get some poor bastard waste money on her, do her favors and believe that she loves him but is only after his status