Ask to an AI Persona
Love Doctor Brad
Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...
Fashionista Amy
I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒
Cinematic Lily
With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...
Travel Buddy
I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...
Athletic Chloe
Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...
Advisor Smith
With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...
Gamer Bella
With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...
Laura
Have questions about GirlsAskGuys? I'm here to help!
James The Foodie
From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
57Opinion
MRAs are the male equivalents of feminists.
Fuck them both, equality is a false god.
Yeah everyone needs to be free just like he bible says
I'm detecting sarcasm.
well feminism did cause these problems. attack the problem from the root.
Not really. Those problems were actually a part of society long before feminism.
Women have always been, erroneously, seen as primary care-givers to children, with men being primary providers.
Women have always gotten the kids. But not every woman is a capable caregiver, and some men are phenomenal caregivers.
This is a fault of society as a whole. Imposing a bias. That bias is perpetuated by traditional culture and regressive groups. People trying to keep the culture of the mid to early 1900s alive.
And the same can be said about a lot of issues in our culture. The view of women as weak, dependent, and emotional. The view of men as stoic, strong, independent.
These didn't appear because of feminism. They appeared because of traditional society and cultural bias.
Those need to be eliminated. This fear of "effeminate men" and shit like that needs to eliminated. Unless a partnership is met between the two sexes the bickering will go on forever.
@SomeOtherGuy not true but i dont have the energy for a rebuttal.
That's fine. If you concede your rebuttal no one can hear it though.
But it's whatever. You disagree. Simple as that.
my rebuttal is that what you say is wrong from a legal stand point and social. men wore considered better for the children but women couldnt do as much as men so they had them by default.
Not quite following. Some of that didn't make any sense...
Men were seen as ideal caretakers for children and the ideal parent for them to be with, but women couldn't do anything so they got the child instead?
@SomeOtherGuy yes. however feminist changed that to women are better care takers so they should receive custody of children.
Well, beforehand divorce was unheard of. It was socially stigmatized. You'd be seen as breaking an important tenant of God and marriage. Striking your wife was legal, and if a man was struck by his wife he would never ever report it or speak up. Unfortunate, because many men are born slender. Macho man is not an across-the-board build.
Wait. So feminism just took the idea that women get the children for no reason in all cases, to women get the children cause they're good with them instead? Nothing changed, just the reason kids went with their mother.
Why would society just give women the kids if men were as capable? That doesn't make sense. What male judge decides that men are the best to raise a child then gives the kids to women?
Are you sure that's a real thing? Cause you're suggesting people in authority like to just fuck with peoples heads and nothing more.
Bigger and riched would always be more superior, Just give up you guys. I am clearly supreme one hair
It seems auto-correct go the best of you.
The MRM is pointless because men are in charge of society.
not true at all. women are the majority vote and are over represented in government positions. good way to swallow the feminist cool aid.
@dudeman Men still hold the position of power.
when you're voted into office, you do what the constituents want. dont be so naive
@dudeman Wrong. It was men who gave women their rights because again they were in charge of society. Remember it wasn't too long ago that women had almost no rights.
same with men as well. it wasn't a long time span from the time men got rights to when women got rights. just stop making yourself look silly. its painful.
@dudeman No actually it's you are looking silly. You clearly don't know anything about history.
lol it was a very short time span from when men got rights to when women got rights. you clearly know nothing. also men had to sign up for the draft to get their rights.
@dudmane LOL VERY SHORT TIME SPAN? Men had way more rights than women for hundreds-thousands of years are you serious? In other countries in the world women are just now being allowed to vote lol wow.
Both your arguments are pretty fallacious. One side more than the other but still.
Men do not hold all the power. Women do not have more rights.
Women get more consideration in certain areas and less in others (wrongly). Don't confuse a right with consideration. A right is something in the legal system, a consideration is a part of society. One is a lot less messy than the other.
Men don't hold the power. The rich hold the power. The wealthy and politically suave hold the power. If you want a real fight for power, consider class warfare, not gender warfare.
Men don't rule society. The rich do. Always have. And they blame the poor for not letting them be wealthier. Wealth isn't ran by men. It's ran by a family unit. A dynasty. Behind every rich man is a rich woman helping pull the strings.
Don't lose focus of the situation. It's not about who holds the power, cause we know who does. It's what the average life of our citizens are like.
@SomeOtherGuy The people in charge are white and male. No matter what you guys say that is a face and if they wanted to change things they could and have done it before.
A fact*
Look how the men in the Middle East suppress the women in the Middle East. They can do that because THEY ARE IN CHARGE.
Not every person in charge is white and male. Hilary, though I am not fond of her, certainly holds a lot of power. Obama, who is not "white" is certainly in a position of power. There are a lot of female and colored CEOs as well.
But what do they all have in common? They're all rich. The rich are in power. Far more than "white males are in power."
Another issue with "white males" are in power is that it suggests these men are singular things. Most all these rich men have a family. For example, the Kardashians, as much I don't like them, have power amongst their family.
These men are not singular things. It's not a family of two dudes married with two male children. Women share part of the power with their husbands.
It's not a fact. It's your bias, and it has weak logic, for the same reasons I pointed out.
There are a DISPROPORTIONATE amount of straight, white, males in place. But that has more to do with an exclusivity on that wealth by western culture in western societies.
All those middle eastern men with power who are white?
All those people in the indian government who are in charge that are white?
All those people in Asian who run those big corrupt construction facilities that are white?
Are you still prepared to argue that it's all the white people in charge?
Or can you acknowledge that the culture is mostly white, so white people are more readily available to take that wealth and power?
Do you realize how logically inconsistent you are being?
the patriarchy is in fact a stealth gynocracy.
its run by manginas for thier wife.
I'll agree with dev765 to the point, that as a whole, it's still a mans world. As a world view of course. Women are still held back in society, where men are in control. A general statement, I'll admit but turn on your TV, get on the Internet, read the paper, explore politics. It's still amans world... as a whole.
@AidaRoma You're right, the rich and powerful who sit on the seats of power are largely men. I imagine that will be changing in the next couple generations. But it's not something that's going to happen right away. So long as women are being encouraged to step up to the plate in society, we will see those paradigms shift.
But it's important that as they shift, one group isn't put out because of it. In order to progress, the shift has to happen proportionately.
Men may still rule the upper class, but things are a bit less clear for the lower class.
@SomeOtherGuy You're wise beyond your years. I agree, and you've made good points. Sadly, in some cases it's, us... we women, we can be our own worst enemy when it comes to equality. We all need to stop judging, and deciding, for women, and others for that matter... how we want to move forward. And how we should behave, and what we should do with our lives. To be equal, is to decide... for ourselves who we want to be, and where we want to be.
Well damn after reading that I guess I'm a believer in the Men's Rights Movement
There is only way for this movement to exist-if those men are gay!
Naw a lot of MRMs hate gays.
@SomeOtherGuy How so? What evidence do you have to back that claim?
Well they must not hate gays, because there is no other reason for this movement to exist, if men are straight.
Exactly!
Actually I stand corrected. I have found a decent amount of MRMs that don't mind gays. Though I have found a handful that do, but the verdict is in favor of acceptance of male homosexuals.
I'll admit, the rule on the MGTOW subreddit about not talking about the LGBT movement had me wondering, as well as a few posts. But I can kinda see why those rules are there and I find they're more benign than on the surface.
you people are nuts
didn't read by the way lmao
So what's your point?
Please no more hatered...
All feminists do is stir up hatred agaisnt men
@TimeSplitters123 He said, hate frothing at his mouth.
lol. didn't know such a movement existed.
AMEN AMEN AND AMEN,