Evolution: The Greatest Hoax On Earth

[Love_Is_Eternal]

The reason I felt the need to write this myTake is because of the aggression of those who defend it. Evolution is now considered a fact by most people, and anyone who rejects it is considered ignorant, stupid, uneducated, and anti-science. If you reject evolution, you will be called every name under the sun. It is a very dogmatic belief system that can never be challenged in the eyes of those who defend it.

But what many people don't realize is that evolutionists are playing a very dirty trick on you. There are two kinds of evolution--micro and macro. Micro evolution is a fact, macro evolution is not. Defenders of evolution would have you believe that the only difference between micro and macro evolution is time. And since micro evolution is a fact, nobody can logically reject evolution. That's how they trick and confuse you. Evolution is only a fact if it's micro evolution. But macro evolution is accepted on blind faith. It's not even scientific, yet it is taught as fact all through the education system.

I actually find it quite hilarious how educated fools have tricked the masses into believing that they are nothing more than a highly evolved animal. In fact, many evolutionists say that you use to be a fish. Do you really believe that? Sounds like a Brothers Grimm fairy tale to me. Defenders of macro evolution arrogantly claim that there is overwhelming scientific evidence to support it. On the contrary! The fact of the matter is that evolutionists don't have as much as one single shred of evidence to support their bizarre claims. Macro evolution is the biggest lie ever fabricated. So big a lie in fact, that most people today believe it simply because they've heard it taught their whole life.

Many people point to the fossil record as proof of evolution. The fossil record actually disproves macro evolution. All these so called "missing links" are frauds. There is no link to find. The history of the fossil record is nothing but fraud upon fraud. Ask a scientist or evolutionist for proof of macro evolution and you'll get a bunch of wishy-washy speculation, but no solid proof. People had better wise up and realize that they are allowing educated fools to make a monkey out of them.

Defenders of macro evolution are so irrational that they even deny creation. They expect us to believe that once upon a time we use to be a fish that eventually evolved into a human millions of years later, yet they refuse to believe that there was an intelligent creator behind the fine tuning of the universe, intelligent life, and the human brain. The truth is, defenders of evolution will accept anything that the scientific community tells them. If scientists claimed they had evidence that humans originated from a monkey turd, atheists would believe it.

Macro evolution is simply false science. Apart from Dr. Frankenstein tampering in a lab, God's laws nof nature do not allow for interbreeding of species. A cat and a dog can never mate and reproduce, nor can a human and a ape reproduce. God made each animal according to their kind. That is why dogs breed with dogs and apes breed with apes. And if it's true that humans are highly evolved animals, then evolutionists should have no problem with beastiality. The truth is, humans and animals are totally different. Only humans were created to worship their creator. Animals don't have this ability. That's what makes humans special. We were created in God's image. Animals were not. This fact alone shows how stupid and bogus macro evolution is.

One last thing: defenders of macro evolution usually resort to name calling and petty insults. They usually respond with "You just don't understand evolution." What is there is understand? Macro evolution is a science-fiction and doesn't exist. The reason defenders of macro evolution are so thin-skinned and are so aggressive in their beliefs is because they're insecure. If people deny God and creation it doesn't make me the least bit angry, because deep down I know that God and creation are true. It's usaually the angry, aggressive people who are insecure about their beliefs.

Thanks for reading.

[Rainie_]

If evolution is a hoax, care to explain to me how there are different breeds of dogs? Sureeely bulldogs weren't made by god? 😂 For a matter of fact domestic dogs are a artificially human created animal, using the concept of evolution to create an animal of their liking. For instance taking my dog for example (a Westie breed), they used to have dark fur but it wasn't good for hunting since they couldn't see them so they used the evolution concept of picking out the lightest furred Westies, breeding them, and killing off the offsprings which didn't fit the description, repeat, until eventually you had a white furred dog.
If thats not evolution then you tell me what it is. It may be artificial and bred in a controlled environment but its a perfect example of showing that evolution really is a thing.

[blustar]

Evolution is a thing to an extent but humans didn't evolve from fish lmao

[Love_Is_Eternal]

What you're referring to is micro evolution, not macro evolution. This is how evolutionists have confused and deceived people.

[Rainie_]

@blustar Might seem crazy that we evolved from a small bacteria but thinking about how many billions of years back ago that was its not so unbelievable in my opinion considering how fast you can evolve dogs.

[BruceJender]

@blustar We have a common ancestor with the apes... not fish.

[blustar]

Loooool

encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images

[blustar]

s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...7aaddd17a2.jpg

[BruceJender]

@blustar The levels of stupidity have now hit the roof.

[Rainie_]

@blustar Wolves don't actually look exactly like they did millions of years ago... And another note, humans domesticated wolves and changed them to their liking while the wild ones continued to adapt and change the natural way (which is a much slower process).

[blustar]

Whatever you say crazy lady

[Bobbyhill1]

If you are going to talk about dogs at least tell the truth. Dogs didn't come from humans selective breeding they are from a line of extinct wolves that died out over 10,000 years ago (and this common anestor has yet to be found like any other animal) this is the problem with evolution as the guy states. There is no physical proof of it. Dog species all come from different extinct wolves just like humans come from an extinct ancestor that was never found

[Waffles731]

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/47319122.jpg

[Waffles731]

""Only humans were created to worship their creator. Animals don't have this ability." How do you know? Have you ever spoken to a dog?"
Also you do realize that we have found evidence of gorillas and bonobo spirituality

[blustar]

Your username "waffles731" and posting a meme as a rebuttal doesn't prompt me to take anything you say from now on seriously.

[Bobbyhill1]

@blustar yet his question does pose a rebuttel to your post? You have no idea what goes on in a animald mind. Your brain is so feeble and dense its funny

[blustar]

@Bobbyhill1 look at you using words like dense and feeble.
Congratulations, do you feel smart yet?👏😂

[Waffles731]

@blustar Don't blame us for you being dumb, we are just the messenger.
If you understood genetics you'd realize that your parents are the more likely candidates

[blustar]

You dont "understand" anything, you just parrot what your taught from a book.

Since you love memes so much

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/58620001.jpg

[Anonymous]

I started to write a long response disproving the vast majority of your claims but I'm beginning to believe you're simply saying these things to get a rise out of people or to protect your religious viewpoints or simply to avoid cognitive dissonance. The interesting thing about things like this is you don't have to believe in them for them to be true. So if you genuinely want the truth continue to question. Continue to search on your own through the writings of both evolution supporters and deniers. Don't fall into confirmation bias. Don't believe anything not even yourself. Look for evidence. Look for proof. Look at the lies think about the lies and disprove lies until only the truth remains. Actively challenge your current perceptions while remaining skeptical towards the opposition and eventually you'll move closer to the truth. And even if you never reach the truth on something like this it doesn't matter because your own personal beliefs can't change the natural processes that have been in motion since before you were born. If you want to believe that millions of scientist are somehow keeping quiet about the biggest lie on earth and not a single one has spilt the beans then please continue. But I personally don't believe human beings are that well coordinated and intelligent and I've met, studied with and occasionally fucked the very conspirators you claim are pulling these giant hoaxes together. And if they were what benefits do these scientist get by helping perpetuate these things? But I guess religious organization keep their lies going pretty well. But then again since the internet was invented countries with more access have steadily become less religious. Then again America IS one of the few countries that hasn't changed very much religiously. But they're also the country which created religions like Scientology to benefit off its tax laws so the incentive to keep up the lie is definitely there and it's not like you can disprove a religion since most are by nature untestable. All you need is the threat/reward of an afterlife and people in a partial state of learned helplessness to defer to the "wisdom" of someone else. But that's beside the point. As someone with a biology degree I've met and argued with enough people with the same mentality as you that I got tired by my second year. Not because it was difficult to prove you wrong but because it was difficult to convince people like you that nothing bad will happen or is happening.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Not every scientist believes in macro evolution. Very often it's the majority who are wrong and the minority who are right. I know a guy who use to work in the scientific community. He said it is very biased how evidence is determined. It's always easier to go along with the crowd and accept whatever is popular. Same in the education system. If you reject evolution you may very well be bullied and ridiculed. That's just how it is.

[Opinion Owner]

You do realize that those that supported evolution have been in the vast minority for most of human existence right? And only in the past century or so has enough evidence been uncovered to convince people of its accuracy. So if you're trying to suggest that simply being in the minority against a popular opinion is proof of your accuracy you're going to be disappointed a lot. Sometime the truth aligns with popular opinion. At one point in history people believed the world was flat and the sun revolved around the earth. There are still a small minority who believe this and just like people who deny evolution most are dismissed and ignored because they can't present plausible evidence to support their claims.

[Opinion Owner]

So yes your right not every scientist believes in macro evolution but nearly all biologist do.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Like I said, the scientific community is very biased when it comes to determining what passes as evidence. Not all scientists accept macfro evolution, so obviously not everyone is convinced. It's the same with most organizations. There aremany police who disagree with things in the police force, but the just go along with it, because going against the system can screw you over. Same with the drug companies. There are many people curing their cancer with natural trwatments, and there are whistle blowers in the medical profession saying that there is a conspiracy by big pharma to cover up cures for cancer. Plus, the information that comes from the scientific community is usually passed down to us through our government, and governments cannot be trusted to tell us the truth. So no, there is zero evidence for macro evolution despite it being taught as a fact.

[Opinion Owner]

As someone who worked both with government officials both national and local as well as scientist. (My aunts a mayor, another aunt works for the pentagon, an uncle of mines a high ranking military officer, two of my uncles ran companies that were highly essential to the local economy and were on multiple city and state boards, and two friends of mine interned with my current cities mayor) I can with confidence tell you a vast majority of your government officials and others involved in the government (at least in the US) have a very poor grasp on science and most scientist hate having to deal with government. If this wasn't the case we wouldn't be having such a huge problem implementing sustainable living laws. So I strongly doubt they're working together. Either that or damn near everyone I know who works for the government and or the scientific communities are amazing liars/actors. There is no conspiracy. You don't have to believe me. In fact I know you won't. And honestly don't care

[Opinion Owner]

Also you keep lumping all scientist together. It's kind of irritating because I have a degree in biology. I have some knowledge of related field like chemistry and general physics but know almost nothing about geology, astrophysics or quantum. Scientist have field they specialize in. Finding a geologist that doesn't believe in evolution means almost nothing because he/she studies minerals not living beings. That's like asking a welder how to disarm a bomb.

[Opinion Owner]

On top of that not all biologist study the origin of life. Some like ecologist only study modern life and don't even deal with evolution on more than a minimal microscale. I have yet to run into a biologist with a CV of studies on the origins of life that disagrees with evolution. It's always some guy with no biological background claiming the rest of the field is ignorant or lying. Almost always they have some book they're selling or some facility they're trying to get funding for. They know their are a lot of creationist out there (usually fundamentalist Christians or Muslims) looking for people to confirm their prexisting biases for monetary gains. They're often funded by religious organizations that also make tax free money every week by simply reading from a dates book full of common sense lessons, promises of well being, untestable threats toward those that disagree, and otherworldly borderline unbelievable elements. You want to talk conspiracy. Look at the vaticant's cash flow

[Love_Is_Eternal]

I still don't believe in macro evolution because I've never seen any convincing evidence for it. You are aware that there have been many frauds and hoaxes over the decades?

[Opinion Owner]

Yes. But I also know many things like the okapi, playtypus and the musk deer were labeled frauds and I've seen them living in person with my own eyes to know they're not. I was a creationist until college. It took months of studying biology daily and doing experiments with my own hands before I stopped believing in creationism. My own parents are still creationist. So in no way am I expecting you to come out of this a "believer" in evolution. Creationism is fairly simple. All you've gotta do to believe in it is believe that some thing created all the animals and they had babies and after generations all the modern day organism were here. It's only like 3 things to understand. Evolution on the other hand although in my opinion more plausible requires an understanding of the common genetic code, carbon dating, genetic sequencincing, embryonic development, and a slew of other things. One idea I'd a story the other is a puzzle. I don't expect anyone to just accept it

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Have you ever seen macro evolution with your own eyes? Have you ever seen one species evolve into another species?

[Bobbyhill1]

You do know creationism isn't just that rivht? There are even scientist who try and prove god. The obesver affect simulation theory etc

[Lightspeed-Lemon]

First, belief in evolution and belief in God are not mutually exclusive. Evolution may simply be the mechanism by which God created the universe over billions of years. Even the Catholic Church accepts this as a distinct possibility, considering there's a lot more physical evidence for evolution than Creationism.

Second, there is only one Tree of Life on Earth, meaning all lifeforms originated from the same spark of life at the very beginning. So we share some DNA with every other living organism on the planet, from apes to fish to trees and even fungus. How could that be if all species weren't related somehow?

We shouldn't get upset at the thought that humans could have developed from earlier, simpler forms. That has been the case with everything in the universe as well as everything manmade. Advanced things like human brains, ecosystems, and computers didn't just spring into being. All had to go through a process of development. The human race is still developing even now. Does the fact that every person on Earth started out life as a single cell in their mother's womb make them any less special?

Evolution helps explain the development of species but it's still inadequate to explain the origin of life. Unfortunately Darwin named his book On the Origin of Species, making people think it was an explanation for life itself.

[Infynis]

This was fairly well written, but your lack of sources while pointing fingers at evolutionists for making up facts is a bit hypocritical. I'd also like to point out that you use just as much speculation in your arguments as you say evolutionists do: "We were created in God's image. Animals were not. This fact alone..." That's not a fact, that is speculation. Also the fact that two species of animals can't interbreed doesn't prove anything, and not only that, it's not true in every case. Horses can breed with donkeys, and humans crossbred with neanderthals (I'd link the website, but I'm not high enough level).
In short, don't bring spurious 'knowledge' into a scientific debate.

[Shawn777]

Cool post. I believe evolution is rel, but evolution with God. Have you ever read of the evolution of Consciousness? That, is in fact a undeniable truth if you are aware of the fact that this world we are in is an illusion, 'maya' as the Mayans put it and that the real world is something hidden behind the scenes, something spiritual. Spirit is eternal and when we die, we can choose whether or not we want to incarnate in another life again into whatever we choose, a fish, a plant or even another human; or to ascend into higher realms and resume mastering self and your personal conscious evolution

[rsstanford]

We don't start out as a carbon life force. You need more chemical so where would they come from? so how come human fetuses look exactly like any other mammal fetus in the first few stages if we aren't connected? So you're saying that if a black bear somehow ended up in Iceland that they can't evolve into a polar bear? There genes would adapt to the environment causing new genes to be created to survive the cold environment and to blend into that environment. ( survival of the fittest) if you look at a primates DNA and then ours there is a similarity, primates are just one letter from having a DNA. No one knows if we were primates of fishes they are just theories. As science and technology become more advance there will be more theories about where humans come from. But you shouldn't take theories seriously though either. I have a theory that humans may come from jupiters moon. See just a theory.

[anonman32]

you are too illiterate in science to know what you are talking about. if different species cannot interbreed, why is is that Europeans have 5% Neanderthal DNA? the Neanderthal is a different species. if we are not animals, why do we share 95% of our DNA with chimps? and why do we share 50% of our DNA with trees? what you say makes no sense. if you knew anything about science at all then you would know it rejects dogmatic principles unlike your religion and god.

there is no fine tuning to the universe, it is all due to natural selection. why can't you understand this? if you fail to adapt to the environment you cease to exist as a species. it is very troublesome to me that people today are quite as illiterate in science as you are.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Name calling only shows your lack of intelligence as an adult.

[anonman32]

what name calling exactl would that be? i just made an observation.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Go back and read what you said. Childish insults only make you look stupid.

[anonman32]

i dont think many children know the word illiterate and you dont know the difference between an observation and an attack on your person, which i never did.

[Anonymous]

Hey Dingbat. Macroevolution is years and years of microevolution across several generations... For example. I was born without Wisdom teeth. If my partner doesn't have Wisdom teeth genes either my kids likely won't have Wisdom teeth. And their kids won't depending on their partner and so on. With enough generations a lot of humans will start being born without wisdom teeth. Boom microevolution. Now add a few thousand types of microevolution over the course of 1 million years. That is macroevolution.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Macro evolution is science-fiction and is accepted on blind faith.

[Opinion Owner]

How. It is a collection of small changes that influence the development of a species. We have proof of it on our hands. The first rat that developed an apposable thumb gave that trait to every single ape like creature. Silverbacks kept their body hair, pelvis, and slow twitch muscle fibers. Other animals before us gained bipedalism, lost body hair, and developed fast twitch muscle fibers. Chimps and Humans share nearly identical dna. We look so different because of years and years of microevolution. Aka macroevolution.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

That's micro evolution, not macro. If macro evolution takes millikns of years then it's not science, it is blind faith.

[PrincessofNohr]

You won't convince him, don't waste your breath. What you're saying is precisely correct - micro and macro evolution are faulty terms, since they are the same process only differed by time. The evidence is all there, but people will deny it if it conflicts with their worldview or they can't understand it.

[cjmtherfcker]

Further investigation showed that there is an interconnection of all 4-space/time energy (as quanta and elementary particles) with the subquantum vacuum-plenum (the Void) through a process of cooperative sustainability. In simpler terms; everything is interconnected on a subquantum level, which ultimately makes everything in existence ONE; there is no separation! This ONE-ness is "All That Is", the ultimate definition of "God", and so it has proven to be in the Working Model.
Theentites that made us were not GOD, even thought they present themselves as such.
Evolution, Creation, and Panspermia are all responsible for life on this planet.
Read the source material for your religious book and you will see the parts that have been left out and manipulated

[Redstang88]

Oh boy... Where do I start?
"Only humans were created to worship their creator. Animals don't have this ability." How do you know? Have you ever spoken to a dog?
"educated fools have tricked the masses into believing that they are nothing more than a highly evolved animal"
Well what would you say we are? Our genes are nearly identical to apes, and yes, biologically we are animals.
I could go on but I have better things to do.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

If you truly believe that then you should have no problem with beastiality.

[Redstang88]

What does that have to do with anything I said?

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Everything

[Redstang88]

Care to elaborate? Or are you going to stick with the religious debate tactic- "I'm right, you're wrong! Lala lala la la!"

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Or are you going to stick with the religious debate tactic- "I'm right, you're wrong! Lala lala la la!"

That's exactly what atheists do.

[Redstang88]

Give me one shred of evidence supporting creation outside of the Bible.
The thing about science is its based on proof- if you can support your point I will listen.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Sure, just switch your brain on and open your eyes. Creation is all around you.

[Redstang88]

Proof, not belief

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Can you prove that creation DOES NOT exist?

[Redstang88]

Yeah
Its fucking called evolution.
There is no shortage of facts and supporting evidence- missing links, common ancestors, extinct species.

[Anonymous]

Did it ever occur to you that a thousand small changes amount to a big change in the end?
And given that you're fine accepting that small changes occur over time, is it not highly rational to assume that given enough time change will also be happening on a wider scale?

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Macro evolution is blind faith and is fake science.

[Opinion Owner]

Well, you're clearly a person who can be reasoned with.

[alb84]

"We were created in God's image. Animals were not. This fact alone shows how stupid and bogus macro evolution is."

where is that FACT? why don't you subject religion to the same standards as you do it with science? Why are you demanding proof when you offer none? You can believe whatever you want, but don't present your beliefs as facts when you have no proof to back them up.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

And where is YOUR proof?

[alb84]

I'm not making any claims... you are.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

You believe in macro evolution, so where is your proof?

[alb84]

I'm not the one who has make a take and I'm not the one in question here... I'm a reader, who is asking the writter, where is the proof. So far, you have offered none, none against evolution, and none in favour of creation.

Stop bothering me until you have a proof about both of your claims.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Oh, but atheists hate having the burden of proof turned around on them. Atheists are always going on about evidence. "Where's the evidence, where's the evidence, where's the evidence." Well, where is YOUR evidence. Creation can be clearly seen. You deny it. So present YOUR evidence. Oh I forgot, you don't have any lol.

[alb84]

There is no evidence whatsoever about the existence of a superior entity (god/goddess/space monkeys/whatever), but there is evidence that humans share DNA with other animal species in this planet... and not a small percentage.

www.ca-biomed.org/csbr/pdf/fs-whynecessary.pdf

Are you implying that medicines doesn't work either... because evolution is nonsense? if evolution is nonsense, how do you explain that humans share a huge percentage of DNA with other species?

Anyway, I don't give 2 shits about evolution... religion on the other hand, annoys me... annoys me the fact that they have been trying to convert me since I was a little kid, and I'm sick of this shit... so... I'm asking you for the last fucking time... WHERE IS PROOF ABOUT GOD?

Don't answer me anymore... unless you have solid evidence about god's existance.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Humans and animals share similar DNA because they were made by the same creator. It doesn't mean we all came from each other, unless you accept beastiality? And what you're talking about is micro evolution, not macro evolution. You want proof of God? I admit that I cannot wave a magic wand and make God appear to you. My evidence would be creation.

[BruceJender]

https://marcamos.com/ha/i-give-up.gif

You're literally too stupid to insult.

[blustar]

Either give a proper response or dont respond at all.

[BruceJender]

I suppose OP believes God created atoms, nuclei, mitochondria, DNA, amino acids, etc...

I'm astonished people still believe God is the ultimate creator.

[blustar]

Ok so im guessing you think god is someone who sits in thw clouds still. Scientific laws dont create themselves, this plain of existence would have no structure without a creator.

[BruceJender]

No, God doesn't exist (imo). He's a figment of theist's imagination.

We establish scientific laws by discovering them...

You think God somehow carried out the Big Bang?

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Name calling is just a cop out and doesn't support your position.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Well everything coming from nothing makes perfecr sense, right? LOL

[blustar]

Being able to discover something is based off something that was already created or has already existed.

Humans dont establish anything.

[BruceJender]

So do please tell us how God created everything...

[Love_Is_Eternal]

I don't know. I'm not God.

[BruceJender]

Well he isn't exactly to explain, is he. There are no facts or evidence he created anything, besides a book.

Not looking good for you lot.

[blustar]

@Love_Is_Eternal this guy's grammar is terrible. >> @BruceJender 😂

[Jxpxtxr]

This made my day

31.media.tumblr.com/.../...3fhaeL1I1r0vqjb_500.gif

[aficionado]

I stopped reading this the moment you brought 'god' into the equation! You can't mention 'god' and 'science' in the same article!

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Without God science would not exist.

[cjmtherfcker]

in our current religious beliefs yes. But ultimately science and religion must merge for us to expand our consciousness properly. When I say religion I mean more spirituality than any specific religion

[PrincessofNohr]

en.m.wikipedia.org/.../E._coli_long-term_evolution_experiment

'Nuff said.

[kingarthas]

Evolution is fact. before writing this none sense you could read about it. Science doesn't want/try to trick people. It only wants to discover truth. If you have any real proof. You can easily take nobel prize. but you only reject it, because you are a believer as you said. You don't care about proofs. at least respect science. It improves your life quality for sure.

meh i am too late for this respond :p

[MisterSir]

"If people deny God and creation it doesn't make me the least bit angry, because deep down I know that God and creation are true. It's usaually the angry, aggressive people who are insecure about their beliefs."

... so because i don't share your religious beliefs, i'm an angry, aggressive person who is insecure about my beliefs?

makes sense.

[somebodysaycheese]

A science musuem where i live. which is a major city says we came from fish acutally not monkeys. And now science is starting to question evolution because they beleive we came from mars. I dont take it serious.

[VirginiaBeachBum]

It's not God I have a problem with, it's his fan club.

[tibbany]

I feel like no one wins with this and it's just causing problems. No one will ever truly know until we all die. So why even argue about it.

[Love_Is_Eternal]

Because macro evolution is being taught as a fact all through the education system.