Ask to an AI Persona
Laura
Have questions about GirlsAskGuys? I'm here to help!
Gamer Bella
With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...
Love Doctor Brad
Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...
Travel Buddy
I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...
Fashionista Amy
I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒
Athletic Chloe
Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...
James The Foodie
From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...
Cinematic Lily
With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...
Advisor Smith
With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
31Opinion
You keep dropping back into the definition of feminism. That and pointing out the historical representation of feminism.
This is of course to obfuscate from the current reality that in it's current incarnation, feminism is collapsing.
This discussion thread does a fantastic job of showing why feminism needs a "pope" if it wants to become mainstream.
For every Christina Hoff Summers, there are 100 Laci Greens and Onisions screwing it up.
Well written. I've been feeling this way for a while about the term.
Feminists like Christina Hoff Sommers deserve much respect but feminists like her are VERY RARE. Most of them are radical feminists/feminazis.
Great post! Very thoughtful and well written. I quite enjoyed reading it. Thank you.
The multiple definitions and views actually just end up leading others to anti-feminism and sometimes MGTOW. I do not support any of these movements. I believe and hope that more women and men do not either. #egalitarianism
I don't think egalitarianism can work. I use to think it could, but not anymore. You would just have ex feminists, claim under egalitarianism, women were still not equal to men, and it would result in nothing more than a change in the name from feminism to egalitarianism.
@heavensgift2girls Maybe it can work, maybe not.. No one can say for sure. I have to say though that you are assuming too much of a once relevant movement. The movements mentioned above represent the closest example of egalitarianism now.
To me, the defining factor of all branches of feminism is the belief in Patriarchy Theory. If you don't believe that men have stacked the feck against women then you are not a feminist, if you believe that they have, then you are.
Too late for that. Too little too late. Feminism doesn't have limits, rules, and regulations. It never will. And that's the problem. That's always been the problem. There is no "out of bounds" when it comes to feminism. So that ultimately leaves room open for a free reign of terror.
When men could do what ever the hell they wanted to women, and in society, their power didn't seem out of bounds... Strange how that works.. #WhyWeNeedFeminism
@homegirl123 If by "whatever we wanted" you mean restraint then yes. Restraint on the female sexuality is of utmost importance in order for the family unit to survive. Let 5 whores loose in a village - and that village will burn down in one day. Men have a built in weakness to female sexuality. I don't even have to mention voting or workforce participation. We just don't "need" those things from women. It's just that simple. Your voting has done absolutely nothing to improve the nation. And your workforce participation has only taking away from family structure.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? That is the most bullshit answer I have ever heard. There are several villages in this world that have open marriage arrangements, and women and their sexuality, are not restricted and they are doing perfectly well. And how about we control a MANs sexuality because they have been home wrecking since the beginning of time. For example, their extramarital relationships with female slaves would almost always create a strain on their families. And before you blame the slave just know that those women were raped and forced to have these relationships with their white slave owners because they were property. Also, women should have the right to pursue jobs in the work force, how about the act of raising children become a joint task--it takes two after all. Our ability to vote has affected our society. It has give FIFTY PERCENT of the population a right to voice their opinions in democracy. Lets take away your right to vote and see how you like that...
@homegirl123 Wow. You missed the entire point. I'm talking about monogamy and a proper family unit. Not open relationships and perversion. Extra marital affairs and open relationships aren't very different. Neither will usually last very long and they are both perversion. Which is why relationships don't last very long today. Marriage has utterly failed. So when you say "doing well" that's complete cow shit. Also dogs and sluts run hand in hand. There would be no whoremongers without whores. Whores and sluts completely destroy family unit - back to my point about the village.
Yes there are communities that are doing well interms of sexual relationships. Look at the Hadza in Tanzania. Lol I think you have these shitty views of women because of your own experiences. There are shitty people everywhere--men and women-- that ruin marriages. But don't take away women's rights so you can control their sexuality for your own bennifit thats selfish and terrible. I know for me, I like having the freedom to choose who I get to marry and when. I don't want society, or men for that matter, dictating those decisions for me. Women are people too, and should be treated as such. Don't blame women for failed marriages, because marriages have been ahitty for ever, the only difference is people couldn't leave, and if they did they risked being chastised socially. women are humans and all humans should be treated equally.
@homegirl123 You deny a common truth - That sexuality is woman's power and man's weakness. Either you are blind or a deceiver. A woman's sexuality must be held in check. Or family unit will be destroyed.
are you fucking kidding me? That a bunch of bullshit convention that comes from the 18th century. SCIENCE tells us that women actually, during their hormonal cycle, want sex more than men, and men are relatively constant. The idea that women are the gate keepers of sex is a very old and outdated view. Because both sexes are sexually "awakened" for lack of a better word. Men should control themselves and women as well. And yo, your logic doesn't make any sense. "sexuality is a women's power and a mans weakness" if men cave to their sexual desires more than women then they should be the ones to have their sexuality in check. And stop talking about a women's sexuality needs to be kept in check or families will be destroyed, because thats bullshit. Men cheat on their wives and families are ruined. Women cheat on their husbands and families are ruined. Women aren't ruining families, individuals are. Men ruin families, and women ruin families. So stop pointing your damn finger on women.
@homegirl123 So are you claiming that men an women are the same in this area? Are you also claiming that males can stand up against female nakedness? That sexuality and seductiveness is not a womans bargaining chip? Are you saying the opposite - That we as males are the seductive temptation? That the average males are being gawked and chased simply by wearing tight clothing? If thats what you're trying to imply then that lunacy. If this is truly what you mean then I speak no further.
A woman might have multiple reasons why she might go after a guy for sex. Many of those reasons could involve alterior motives. As men we need is one reason - "female nakedness". And women know this. It's no secret.
Sorry, "as men all we need is one reason".
what the hell are you talking about? So because YOU can't control your dick women should be controlled? Because you can not speak for all men. There are truly decent men that CAN control their "urges" because the CHOOSE to. So, how bout you start CHOOSING to control your self and then--oh my gosh--problem solved!
And I can't believe you are limiting women to their sexuality. WE ARE GOOD FOR MORE THINGS THAN SEX. We can you our brains to get what we want, we don't have to sleep with a shit ton of men to move up in society.
@homegirl123 And what about the great majority of males that cannot? I'm not talking about the exception. I'm talking about the common man. They will not stand against a beautiful naked woman. All it takes is the right woman and he's down. I don't care what's at stake. If he thinks no one's watching and he can get away with it then he'll go for it. But don't take my word for it. Keep pushing that "nonsense". And we'll see if the family unit continues to get better. Or if it will continue to decline as it has. "Statistics follow me".
@homegirl123 Don't forget - the majority of women have a weakness as well. It'$ called finance$ and re$ources. I've already exposed this weakness within my own life. And they're beautiful women. And I get all I "need" from them. With these extreme feminists mind sets they're not marriage material anyway. At this point I only focus on money. There is nothing girls can add to my life. So instead of "man & woman" we can just have "trick & prostitute" all day long - If that's how these girls wanna roll. Family unit is almost dead anyway. "Statistics follow me".
Actually it seems that I have more faith in your sex than you do. If a man doesn't want to have sex, he won't. Following women don't only want money. There are those that do, but WHO the person is matters a lot also.
@homegirl123 All a man needs a girl for us sex, where as girls need us for emotional satisfaction. So it's actually a win for us.
@homegirl123 You have the "exceptions" but I speak only for the major majority of males - When tempted by the right woman they will be prone to fail especially if the esoteric is present - "you obviously don't have faith in women's temptation abilities". Also I didn't say "all women" were geared toward resources and finances - I said the "majority" of women (meaning the average woman). Once again it's not really a big deal at this point. Relationships between men and women have already been destroyed. But I thank god that I have faith in man/woman. Sorry I meant trick/prostitute. May god bless our union.
I think it's time for a new name
The image of the name feminism is kind ruined lol
What about "double X movement"?
Make some shirts with "X-woman" or "X-Chromosome is equally cool as Y"
Or "womanXman"
I'm more interested in actions over words. Feminists and SJWs in general like to redefine words to suit their own narrative, rendering discussion with them useless. See 'sex', 'gender', 'rape' and others for examples.
Feminism is the things to give right to women without talking about equality. Just about the women right and nothing else.
If you define your own movement and they behave different, then there's something wrong with your movement
Feminism, is what female sexists use to justify their sexist behaviour.
That's great. Thanks for such a nice Take💖
Cancer.
The only definition of feminism I know.
I know more definitions, feminism=shit=nonsense=misandry
im a feminist so i acknowledge this <3
Nice words.
All feminism is cancer
I like having the right to vote, so feminism damn straight best be as influential and deathly to the patriarchy.
Pardon me, sir. I totally disagree with you, unless you are refering to feminazism which are the women that do not understand the right message of feminism and "attack" men as we were monsters.
@G_Mars seriously? You think I'm attacking you because your a man... Strange. I'm pretty sure I was attacking the comment that was attacking the movement that gave me the right to vote. It's funny how men get all sensitive when women disagree with them. Poor snow flakes
Having the right to vote has nothing to do with feminism. Those "first wave feminists" weren't feminists. Second wave feminists, just claimed that was first wave feminism, to give their own movement more credibility.
First wave feminists only wanted the right to vote, so they could ban alcohol thereby robbing men of their freedom. For a long time women didn't even want the right to vote, because they were afraid that would mean they could be drafted into the army, just like the men could. It wasn't until the women were sure they wouldn't be forced into combat that women wanted the right to vote, and didn't do it for gender equality. Once the majority of women wanted the right to vote, it was given to them. So not only were they not for equality, they weren't even feminists.
@homegirl123 But it was women who voted Hitler into power. Women vote evil people into authority, which is why the politicians pander to women. Feminism has always been cancer, especially to relationships.
@homegirl123 I'm sorry if you misunderstood my message, madam. My comment was directed to @Love_Is_Eternal. And i was talking about feminazism, not feminism. I totally agree with the world-wide movement of sexual equality.
@G_Mars You can still believe in equality without being a feminist.
OHHHH.. Yes gender equality is essential. I think that is what feminism is, but lets be real if you support equal rights for women I really don't care if you call yourself a feminist. I used to be anti-feminism too, until I learned more about the movement and what it stands for and discovered my own beliefs actually did align well with the movement. But as stated above gender equality really is the true goal, I feel.
@homegirl123 Well unfortunately feminists never stand up for men whenever men are disadvantaged. Feminism just creates hostility between men and women.
Don't let anons comment.
Why?
They will troll you to death when they see this take.
It's not really a problem. This myTake isn't even about supporting feminism. People who are responding with comments about the pros and cons of feminism are just taking any opportunity to get on a soap box.
Then, what is this trend about because people are starting to be confused. You just don't want to accept the facts. You are a joke.
@Mysterioustruth This take is about understanding that the word "feminism" means different things to different people. Anyone who actually read the take should know that, especially since I acknowledged in the take that people who associate feminism with misandry may have a good reason to do so.
Look don't try to fool anybody here. We all know that what feminism means on paper is totally different then what they do. It's a hate group who despise men. It's very obvious. And anybody who call themselves a feminist isn't the kind of human been I'd want to be friends with.
@Mysterioustruth I know people who call themselves feminists who genuinely believe in equality and are not at all misandristic. But, I also know people who call themselves feminists who are hateful towards men. I personally have witnessed both situations with my own eyes. All I'm saying is, find out what feminism means to the person you're talking to before you make assumptions.
There's isn't any feminist who'll directly tell you her intentions. Why, because they're hypocrites. 99% of feminism are terrible human beens because women have all the rights in the world actually even more.
@Mysterioustruth And you've met 100% of people who call themselves feminists, so you'd know.
Look it's very oubvious what they are after. However, because your a female you'll see what you wanna see.
@Mysterioustruth I've never denied the fact that there are some horrible feminists out there, but I do know some people who call themselves feminists who are very reasonable.
All I'm saying is those people are very limited and not as loud.
@Mysterioustruth That may be very true.