I'm not trying to say that I agree with it, but I think the issue of how much sex we each have is largely rooted in biology and is not going to really change. A male is meant to spread his genes to as many females as possible, whereas a female in the natural world needs to be choosy and only mate with the fittest prospects. I'm not saying I feel quite that way myself and I've never slept around much, but I think it's still a big factor.
Ok fair enough but there a difference of treating women less because they dare have sex as well. If you just a horn dog why does it matter if there female horn dogs as well? I know there are a ton of females who are very sexual as well so why is it a issue to some men that there are some sexual females out there in the world?
You call it egalitarianism, I call it first wave feminism I would agree with education with slight correction- *actual* education. Because educated=/=progressive thinking
@Schrodingerscat the people should be discerning. We don't need egalitarianism, education or any other bullshit. But it takes a lot to change the people OR to change ourselves.
I don't know about "necessary" but I once thought it had it's place. After seeing half the women voters elect Trump I decided I would never again support womens rights. I do not want to be associated with that kind of hypocrisy. We deserve what we get.
This should be named "why I hate living in India". Modern society does not need feminism, in fact, it needs feminism to die in order to function properly.
Honestly the fact that people are so offended by the notion of feminism (which is literally just saying that men and women should be treated equally) is a good indicator that we still need feminism.
Also, "unfairness in dating"? I might take you more seriously if you also mentioned the fact that guys have to pay, guys have to make the first move, etc.
Seems to have destroyed the nuclear family and led to the highest level of unhappiness amongst women in North America in the past 50 years (according to GAF score measurements)
The ratio of men to women isn't messed up, it's fairly equal and it makes sense since men have a shorter life span than women. I've heard quite a few stories about women in the west killing their son and stories about people preferring to have a girl instead of a boy in the west which would be bad since in the future we will be able to edit our kids genes so it could affect males greatly in the west.
0
1 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
I do agree with you that everything you said is bad, just wanted to make sure you knew this
Male abilities at physical and mental are more than females , so he must dealed from the childhood as the person who is responsible about the others to lead them. While the females must deals as the follower for the man.
Because look, I know what you think feminism is supposed to be, or what you think it is... From your perspective anyway. What as happened with organized feminism around the world is that it has sacrificed it's core values and turned into a man hating, hateful and utterly stupid strive for a sort of female victimizing culture. Feminists are the biggest threat to women... Precisely because it tries to keep women in an inferior, victimist statue that you just expressed here. Feminism in the past actually did great things but it dosen't anymore, precisely because it dosen't have to. The differences are not made in the mind of men but women, there is this paranoia of sexism that just isn't there. The truth is across the board on studies, there are more women going to university, more of them going into the workforce, and earning more for what they do, and don't try to cite to a wage gap (also an invention) that no economist ever has taken seriously.
To keep on going the perceived wage gap dosen't take into account the type of choices women make, the number of hours they work, and the kind of work they do. It takes a broad stroke at work in society and tries to scream for attention for no reason. Feminism has spread the ideal that men are BY NATURE hateful and against women progressing, they are violent and agressive, and it may not be what you believe in but at it's core it's what a feminist will say when they put in place safe spaces and all that other sort of shit, establishing a rape culture and trying to claim that we encourage and applaud/solicitate rape instead of putting rapists in jail, which is UTTERLY insane. It's sort of like the subject of racism, there has been inequality in the past.. It dosen't mean it carries on endlessly, and holding on to past inequalities is simply REGRESSIVE not progressive.
Feminist want women to lursh around every problem they have at men forever, without even acknowledging how far they have come and what they've done. They are keeping women at an immediate status of inferiority by claiming fallacious inequities and turning those false perceived inequalities at male counterpart. Men are patronizing, violent and sexist almost pathologically, When do women talk about the great things men have done, when do women have slight acknowledgments to the fact that men got us to the moon, or build pyramids, or wrote the declaration that allows you to have all the freedoms you have and express yourself the way you like, that even allows you to petition for women's rights. The matter of a fact is, the barriers that society had upon women, and the limits they set ARE simply not here in our days, so I guess it's my counter-plee to your mytake on why you don't need feminist our days.
Feminism is out of control in the West, and, the feminists in the West don't care at all about what is happening in the Middle East to women or elsewhere. Its a business now... wanna buy a pussynhat?
1 - Bullshit 2 - Bullshit. Women have all the power in dating 3 - Bullshit. If there is an issue with skin colour I don't see how its gender specific. 4 - Bullshit
3 is a good point? but not sure i agree about the others.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
That beyonce photo is incredibly hypocritical as the left one is also digitally changed to make her look darker. She's in between those two photos in skin tone.
I don't disagree with that principle, but if you want abortions to be available to women regardless of their reasons (which I support), you have to accept that it is going to happen.
And if feminists claim to be for equality why have you not adressed male specific problems such as lacking genital integrity rights for male children? Its a right girls have which boys dont.
How often are YOU addressing those issues? Are you posting about circumcision? Are you involved in activism about it? Because I am, and I see a lot of feminists there.
@MlleCake it is only legal where i live for medical reasons but private clinics will still do them. There is nothing to be done about it because they are private clinics.
How are feminists supposed to fix it then? If you can't, we can't. The thing is, the arguments you toss in "Why aren't the feminists worrying about these problems men have..." are just something you throw in to discredit feminists. They aren't anything YOU'RE willing to do something about. So, please, don't tell me how the feminists are ignoring them.
I have been a feminist anti-circumcision activist since I was in my teens, and the only people I ever found that were even talking about the issue were feminists, until about the time that Breitbart started to get popular. We've been in this fight all along. So, spare me, Mr.-Johnny-come-Lately.
@MlleCake i wasn't around when you were a teen was i? I never see feminist news sites talk about how circumsision needs to be stopped. I've only seen an article in cosmopolitan saying that men need a foreskin Like a fish needs a bycicle.
Cosmo is not a feminist magazine. And I doubt you follow any feminist sites. It's not the biggest thing we discuss, but we do discuss it. And the intactivist movement is full of feminists, even though you hear from a lot of angry misogynists there too.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
65Opinion
I'm not trying to say that I agree with it, but I think the issue of how much sex we each have is largely rooted in biology and is not going to really change.
A male is meant to spread his genes to as many females as possible, whereas a female in the natural world needs to be choosy and only mate with the fittest prospects.
I'm not saying I feel quite that way myself and I've never slept around much, but I think it's still a big factor.
Ok fair enough but there a difference of treating women less because they dare have sex as well. If you just a horn dog why does it matter if there female horn dogs as well? I know there are a ton of females who are very sexual as well so why is it a issue to some men that there are some sexual females out there in the world?
Are your points valid?
Yes.
Is feminism the answer?
No.
Then what is answer 😅
@Schrodingerscat egalitarianism and education.
You call it egalitarianism, I call it first wave feminism
I would agree with education with slight correction- *actual* education. Because educated=/=progressive thinking
@Schrodingerscat the people should be discerning. We don't need egalitarianism, education or any other bullshit. But it takes a lot to change the people OR to change ourselves.
@Schrodingerscat this is why we need feminism in India
https://youtu.be/6ciPY2BMrK4
I don't know about "necessary" but I once thought it had it's place. After seeing half the women voters elect Trump I decided I would never again support womens rights. I do not want to be associated with that kind of hypocrisy. We deserve what we get.
This should be named "why I hate living in India". Modern society does not need feminism, in fact, it needs feminism to die in order to function properly.
Honestly the fact that people are so offended by the notion of feminism (which is literally just saying that men and women should be treated equally) is a good indicator that we still need feminism.
These don't apply to Western civilization.
Also, "unfairness in dating"? I might take you more seriously if you also mentioned the fact that guys have to pay, guys have to make the first move, etc.
Maybe in India...
Seems to have destroyed the nuclear family and led to the highest level of unhappiness amongst women in North America in the past 50 years (according to GAF score measurements)
Need to call this take owner as not particularly intelligent.
Care to offer an argument for that? Or was it just a drive-by insult?
Oh yeah? Why so?
The ratio of men to women isn't messed up, it's fairly equal and it makes sense since men have a shorter life span than women. I've heard quite a few stories about women in the west killing their son and stories about people preferring to have a girl instead of a boy in the west which would be bad since in the future we will be able to edit our kids genes so it could affect males greatly in the west.
I do agree with you that everything you said is bad, just wanted to make sure you knew this
Feminism is not needed in THIS society. I do agree that other parts of the world need it, but not here in the US.
Male abilities at physical and mental are more than females , so he must dealed from the childhood as the person who is responsible about the others to lead them.
While the females must deals as the follower for the man.
This makes me cringe so bad I don't evven want to respond
Why so?
Because look, I know what you think feminism is supposed to be, or what you think it is... From your perspective anyway. What as happened with organized feminism around the world is that it has sacrificed it's core values and turned into a man hating, hateful and utterly stupid strive for a sort of female victimizing culture.
Feminists are the biggest threat to women... Precisely because it tries to keep women in an inferior, victimist statue that you just expressed here. Feminism in the past actually did great things but it dosen't anymore, precisely because it dosen't have to. The differences are not made in the mind of men but women, there is this paranoia of sexism that just isn't there. The truth is across the board on studies, there are more women going to university, more of them going into the workforce, and earning more for what they do, and don't try to cite to a wage gap (also an invention) that no economist ever has taken seriously.
To keep on going the perceived wage gap dosen't take into account the type of choices women make, the number of hours they work, and the kind of work they do. It takes a broad stroke at work in society and tries to scream for attention for no reason. Feminism has spread the ideal that men are BY NATURE hateful and against women progressing, they are violent and agressive, and it may not be what you believe in but at it's core it's what a feminist will say when they put in place safe spaces and all that other sort of shit, establishing a rape culture and trying to claim that we encourage and applaud/solicitate rape instead of putting rapists in jail, which is UTTERLY insane. It's sort of like the subject of racism, there has been inequality in the past.. It dosen't mean it carries on endlessly, and holding on to past inequalities is simply REGRESSIVE not progressive.
Feminist want women to lursh around every problem they have at men forever, without even acknowledging how far they have come and what they've done. They are keeping women at an immediate status of inferiority by claiming fallacious inequities and turning those false perceived inequalities at male counterpart. Men are patronizing, violent and sexist almost pathologically, When do women talk about the great things men have done, when do women have slight acknowledgments to the fact that men got us to the moon, or build pyramids, or wrote the declaration that allows you to have all the freedoms you have and express yourself the way you like, that even allows you to petition for women's rights. The matter of a fact is, the barriers that society had upon women, and the limits they set ARE simply not here in our days, so I guess it's my counter-plee to your mytake on why you don't need feminist our days.
Feminism is out of control in the West, and, the feminists in the West don't care at all about what is happening in the Middle East to women or elsewhere. Its a business now... wanna buy a pussynhat?
1 - Bullshit
2 - Bullshit. Women have all the power in dating
3 - Bullshit. If there is an issue with skin colour I don't see how its gender specific.
4 - Bullshit
Missed that you were in India. Maybe true there, don't know. Certainly not true in western society.
3 is a good point?
but not sure i agree about the others.
That beyonce photo is incredibly hypocritical as the left one is also digitally changed to make her look darker. She's in between those two photos in skin tone.
I really liked your mytake. Can I translate it into Turkish and use in Turkish verion of this web-site?
Feminists wanted abortion so dont come whining now how its working against women.
Abortion is okay as long as the gender is not known. It's never okay to abort a kid because of its gender.
I don't disagree with that principle, but if you want abortions to be available to women regardless of their reasons (which I support), you have to accept that it is going to happen.
And if feminists claim to be for equality why have you not adressed male specific problems such as lacking genital integrity rights for male children? Its a right girls have which boys dont.
Feminist is not a political party. Being a feminist means you believe in women's right, but feminists have different opinions about everything.
How often are YOU addressing those issues? Are you posting about circumcision? Are you involved in activism about it? Because I am, and I see a lot of feminists there.
@MlleCake it is only legal where i live for medical reasons but private clinics will still do them. There is nothing to be done about it because they are private clinics.
So, in other words, it's OUR job to fix it for you men, not men's job to fix the problem for men. I get it.
@MlleCake how are we supposed to fix it? The jews amd muslims keep complaining that if its illegal its bad because its a religious tradition for them.
How are feminists supposed to fix it then? If you can't, we can't. The thing is, the arguments you toss in "Why aren't the feminists worrying about these problems men have..." are just something you throw in to discredit feminists. They aren't anything YOU'RE willing to do something about. So, please, don't tell me how the feminists are ignoring them.
I have been a feminist anti-circumcision activist since I was in my teens, and the only people I ever found that were even talking about the issue were feminists, until about the time that Breitbart started to get popular. We've been in this fight all along. So, spare me, Mr.-Johnny-come-Lately.
@MlleCake i wasn't around when you were a teen was i? I never see feminist news sites talk about how circumsision needs to be stopped. I've only seen an article in cosmopolitan saying that men need a foreskin Like a fish needs a bycicle.
Cosmo is not a feminist magazine. And I doubt you follow any feminist sites. It's not the biggest thing we discuss, but we do discuss it. And the intactivist movement is full of feminists, even though you hear from a lot of angry misogynists there too.
@MlleCake it sure has feminist elements.
Occasionally it publishes feminist leaning articles, but it is not in anyway a feminist magazine.
@MlleCake no its fucking garbage.
Oh, I agree, it's a pretty crappy publication.
ur indian too. Yeah, in eastern societies feminism is still necessary but in western ones, women actually got the upper hand a long time ago.
u liked and then immediately disliked my opinion, ur stupid AF OP