So, what punishment would you pick for rape convict?
What should be the appropriate punishment for a rape convict?
So, what punishment would you pick for rape convict?
Your punishment options are very harsh but let's assume that they are fair and ok. I am going to do the Devil's advocate here for a moment. Most people when they read your question pre-assume that the rapist is a male, so most of them have no hesitation to drive their mouse pointer to one of your options. Now, the Devil's advocate question: Would you have the same options for a female rapist, who raped a little boy or girl or a grown man/woman?
Would people here in GAG be so quick and open to choose one of the above as a punishment for a female rapist?
My point: Rape is a despicable action, but society seems that is quick to be harsh and demand those kinds of punishments only when the rapist is a male.
Devil's advocate again: If in your mind, your potential rapist was either a man or woman (no defined sex), then why in your description below the title you state " I would prefer option 4 because, HIS organs come in handy for the useful and, the world would be free of one criminal." . The possessive pronoun "his" betrayed that your initial image of the rapist was male.
Now to answer your question: Yes I believe that he/she must be given the chance to learn from his/her mistake. It's easy to give death or extreme punishment to one criminal but can you, on the other hand give back life or "de-mutilate" another a human who didn't deserved to die or being mutilated?
Firstly, a women being a rapist is quite rare.
Although, it is bad but, not as serious as the amount of male rapists around.
No, a second chance is important but, it would encourage other's to rape and, get another chance at life.
So, until there is a significant reduction in the reports of rape cases, I would prefer my judgement.
And, once the state improves, they could get a second chance.
Part 1) I understand your point of view, but the question you've posted is a very serious one that can not be taken lightly and compiles a very "heavy", if I may say, ethical problem. The way we should approach the topic should be with a cold scientific mind. You stated, and it's absolutely accurate, that most rapists are male. Now what's the first and most important scientific question we have to ask? The question is "WHY?". Why male rapists are more than the female ones? The answer is simple: Women even if they are extremely ugly, the can have access, at least, to a one night stand to quench their animalistic thirst for sexual pleasure. Can you say that for an ugly man, when in many countries even prostitution is illegal? If you visit some questions regarding appearance and sex here in GAG, you'll be amazed by the amount of females who say something along the lines of
Part 2) "I am only attracted to X, Y, Z male attributes because that's what I find attractive and I can't help it because we are animals and it's in our animalistic biology and we are hard wired etc..." Ok, I can accept that, so we are animals. Our animalistic behaviour though doesn't stop there, some of our animalistic behaviours are violent and despicable (such as a male using his row muscle power to take what he wants by a female). Devil's advocate question: Do we embrace partially our animalistic behavior or do we take the whole package? It seems like society is triggered only for the animalistic behaviors that involve acts of physical violence, but doesn't give a damn shit about the animalistic behaviors that operate in the back scene that may drive those violent actions. So let's examine that from the point of view of a rapist:
Part 3)
Female: I don't like you, I am sorry that's how my biology works.
Male rapist: That's ok love, I'll use my superior power to dominate you and take what I want, that's how my biology works.
You may say "But that's horrible because the stronger takes advantage of the weaker and that's awful" and if you say so YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, IT IS AWFUL but that's the true and whole package of the jungle rule. Please, anyone who reads this, don't misunderstand me, I am doing the devil's advocate back an forth for academic purposes. Conclusion: Rape and other violent behaviours such as murder are a pathogenesis of our society which is filled with oxymoron. We live in a social structure that encourages and also admires when the stronger dominates and pushes away the weaker only when it fits our pathetic perceptions of social hierarchy, but just like the three monkeys we close our mouths, eyes and ears in other extends of this behaviour. We should change the basis of our society
Part 4) If we change that simple stupid oxymoron, the whole world will be a better place. Now in case of rape. should we force women to give sex to those men who are not aesthetically pleasing in order to avoid rape? OF COURSE NOT. But what about teaching men and women to be less shallow and don't cover their shallowness behind "biological/animalistic" excuses? At least that would give to the less aesthetically pleasing men, who may resort to rape, more chances in order to have a normal sexual life, the same way not aesthetically pleasing women get their chance to have at least a one night stand from time to time. Now in that hypothetical society if anyone resort to rape than rehabilitating punishment should of course be applied.
So, the conclusion is, every one needs to be taught moral values, laws which would benefit them, instead of teaching crap like when was Napoleon born.
A rapist is sexually starved but, it doesn't mean he does so.
The punishment I said is justified if and only if the convict is proven 100% guilty by using factors like, truth serum, lie detector, psychologists help etc.
The society needs to be taught what is right and wrong from the very start.
Exactly, morals and values are the key! A thief who robes a person in a society where everyone has enough money and a normal life, is not a thief by "need", he can't use this excuse, it's just a greedy person who want's even more. A rapist in a society where females and males are not so shallow, so he/she gets a fair chance in a normal sexual life, can't anymore use his/her sexual starvation as an excuse that drove him/her crazy. He/She is just a despicable, greedy and sick human being with no excuses and he/she must be punished severely for being so.
Eternal rape. Where their anus is healed before every rape.
And they get some alien with spiky penis's and tentacles.
Make them relive the victims moment every minute for the rest of their life, and then some.
Imprisonment. I don't think the death penalty or removal of organs is really acceptable.
But I don't think that we should have the right to kill someone, nor should we have the right to mutilate someone.
No, we don't but, the system does. So, after someone is proven 100 % guilty he should have his organs removed.
It's to reduce the number of rapes.
Putting them in jail won't do much. They could go out with a good deed and, get god's judgement.
And, removing criminals and, giving organs to the needed is just like killing two birds with one stone.
You do realise we're above the "system" and the only reason the "system" is there is to control the weak-minded
There's a difference between right and wrong and legal and illegal
And what you're talking about it lawful, what I'm talking about is moral
Your way will just increase the amount of dead rape victims and the amount of rapists that get away
Well if the only witniss (The rape victim) is dead then it'll be much harder to catch them and you still ain't solving the new landslide of dead rape victims
If the victim is dead they can't report it
But how can you kill the rapists if you don't know who it is, considering your witness (the victim) is dead
How will the crime get reported, the victim is dead
Removing sex organs
Opinion
13Opinion
Giving them life imprisonment or the death penalty is highly ridiculous and you're just asking for trouble if you do that. As for the removal of sex organs and donating all organs of the convicted to the ones in need, you don't seem to take into consideration all the men who are falsely accused if rape and have their lives ruined because of it.
We alright, even if this person is 100% a rape convict, giving them life imprisonment or the death sentence is still ridiculous and is still asking for all kinds of trouble
No you're looking at it all wrong. If you give them life which is the equivalent of murder or the death penalty. Then the rapists will just kill their victims anyway seeing as it's the same time for murder, making it harder to catch them and you'll just end up with a tonne more dead rape victims
Except everyone should have a gun
Self defense plus it's simple really, if everyone has a gun and know how to use it, there'll be less crime. For example, bank robbers are hardly gonna rob a bank if everyone in the bank has a gun now are they. They'd just be shot.
Oh don't be ridiculous, many people have guns in the world and that's probably the most micro reason with relation to gun crimes
One should never deliberately piss anyone off
Not at all actually, but I can tell from that childish poke that you're an incredibly immature 20 year old that should leave these kinds of conversations to the grown ups.
I vote "F".
If is a a male then have the mother fucker taken out in public and on live television and on the internet have his cock and balls chopped off with a meat cleaver then throw them to the coyotes and watch them gobble them up!!!
If it is a female then have her taken out in public and on live television and on the internet and have her legs spread wide open as much as they can then have a cement truck back up and fill her vagina with cement and let it dry and she will never fuck again!!!
There would be no consequences at all as anyone who would be watching would learn a valuable lesson for the rest of their life that if they go out and rape someone that is exactly what is going to happen to you without any excuses at all and would send a clear message to society and anyone who would ever consider raping someone would really think very hard about before they do it.
That is part of the problem in this Country as the laws are too relaxed on these types of felony crimes. It is the same exact thing with murder. You murder someone and your life in taken and fuck putting people in prison for the rest of their worthless lives and the financial burden is left on the hard working public!!!
I would say life in prison but with psychological analysis : if the convict isn't likely to be a recidivist, he should be eligible for a reduced sentence. But if he is likely to be a recidivist or he does it again after being released, life in prison.
second last is the best!
the person must still be alive+ his whole property should be seized
it would be more strict than death penalty.
good point 😍
👍👍
I like option 3. Or instead of sending him to prison, punish him by raping HIM.
But legalizing option 3 would certainly put people at bay.
A suitable amount of time i prison.
I don't believe in the death penalty.
Why don't you go to the rapist and ask him. What if he's mentally sick. How about you let him consult a physician. If his results are clear he should be punished to death. Otherwise he should be treated and taken care of...
We should use option D instead of all death penalties, it's ingenious 😂
Wouldn't option 2 lead to option 4? Lol.
Not necessarily.
Caspsaisan injections every day
How won't kill them
Because you get to watch then feel like they are burning alive with none of the smell
Eye for an eye works well
20 year-life prison sentence.
Jail
No punishment
No punishment?
How did you arrive at that answer with your head all the way up your filthy asshole?
But, still that doesn't mean that rapists don't get punished. Ok, you don't have a sister and your mom is dead so, should murder be legal? Suppose, someone killed your father? How would you feel?
God hasn't given something's to everyone but, that doesn't mean that other's get raped and the convict gets walked away without punishment.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions