It’s a ways off, but she adds a refreshing look at the younger generation, that has Ben hijacked into submission by the progressives. They hate her bc she’s smart and on to their games. The progressives despise smart conservative black women bc it doesn’t fit their racist agenda that keeps black people down, where they belong, in their world. If owns continues on this trajectory, she may be the first woman president. And that would cause the progressives to implode on an epic scale... lol
She is pretty spunky.
Hell yes! That's an awesome video. I did, however, lose some IQ points by reading the other replies.
*Who is she
* I don't know her
*I don't want Trump to win
And I'm surprised that Rev Al hasn't killed her by now.
No. But I will be 18 in 2020, so I’ll be sure to vote for Trump. 😊
Opinion
33Opinion
Stipulating that I am a Republican but no fan of President Trump, I have no reason, prima facie, to give either much consideration to give Ms. Owens or President Trump. This presuming that is the choice being offered.
Ms. Owens, however, beyond offering policies with which, in general, I would not be in agreement, has been grotesquely irresponsible in her handling of here Georgia election defeat. Specifically, she has trafficked in the kinds of racial identity politics that is, particularly in the current cultural context, a case of playing with political fire.
Ms. Owens was defeated by about 55,000 votes in her bid to become Governor of the state of Georgia and has yet to concede defeat. Claiming that she was the victim of a rigged system and a "racist" system. Giving Ms. Owens her due, her opponent was the Georgia Secretary of State and had control of Georgia elections.
In that connection, the voter rolls were purged by the Secretary of States of those whose address did not correspond to their residence and various other irregularities. This eliminating a number of potential voters including presumably potential minority voters who would presumably have been favorable to Ms. Owens.
To be sure, the Secretary of State would have been wise to recuse himself from his duties to enhance trust in the process. However, by no account would the SoS's updating of the voter rolls have amounted to a 55,000 vote margin and Ms. Owen's implications to that effect are noxious.
It is bad enough that we have, at the moment, a President who is reckless in his language, content to pour salt in the social wounds and destructive of established institutions. Suffice to say, the nation does not need another, particularly one who is throwing fire on the tinder dry question of race relations.
That Ms. Owens would throw about such intimations, sometimes explicitly so, in a state like Georgia - with its history of racial segregation - is both reckless and potentially explosive. In this then, Ms. Owens is little better than a Democrat version of Mr. Trump. One Donald Trump is sufficient.
Disraeli famously said, "A nation's liberties are embodied in its institutions. The march of intellect is not enough." Democracy and cultural stability are dependent on a rich web of political, legal and social institutions that codify and reinforce those habits of thought that conduce to ordered liberty.
Political leaders, then, who call those institutions into question are playing with fire. Whether they know it or not, they are calling the rule of law and democracy itself into question and that, as history has repeatedly demonstrated, is not likely to end well.
To this is added the almost elemental nature of racial animosity. Stoking such fires cannot help but be wildly dangerous. Yet the likes of Ms. Owens explicitly, and Mr. Trump less directly by appealing to the worst in human nature, are content to recklessly toss lit matches onto the gasoline pile.
It is despicable and an immediate disqualifier. The President is not only, constitutionally speaking, the executive head of government and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. He or she is also Head of State and as such has a symbolic and ceremonial function that should ideally unify the country.
This role is not unimportant. Particularly in a country like the United States, that is racially, ethnically, and religiously diverse. In such a country, the temptation to identify with one's own, to the expense of a common national identity is always great - and as such is exceedingly dangerous.
Mr. Trump and Ms. Owens are not then very much different. Discretion plays its part here and both would be wise to soothe the ruffled social feathers. Instead, they nurse and exploit grievances and this then festers, particularly among their most ardent supporters.
It is self-indulgent and positively acidic at the social level. It will be good when Mr. Trump finally takes his leave. We do not need another like him.
Yes, I would. I agree with a lot of her ideas.
Breaking news!!! Tomi Lahren and Candace Owens going at it! Who is going to win? ↗
I dunno. If she could be Tomi Lahren in a three round bout, I'd vote for her!
I think it depends on what she does in the next 4-5 years, who else is in the campaign race, maybe who she would choose as a running mate, etc.
I would be open to it. But I wouldn't be voting just to fill some "I'm cool because I'm voting for a woman" or "I'm cool because I'm voting for a celebrity" type deal. I try to vote my conscience. I don't vote just because of popularity, or "because a vote for anyone but the two main people is a vote for the person I can't stand" - I've written in candidates. I don't declare my party. I hate voting "straight ticket." And I'm leery of even voting for a "public image" sometimes; because it often quickly changes.
But based on what I've seen, I agree with many of her talking points... and I might be open to it if she ran. But personally, I'm just trying to work through my own life and not obsess over 5 years from now.
I don't dislike her but she has done nothing to suggest she would be capable of running a country, Trump at least ran many multinational businesses and was in a leader ship position for decades, candace has not been so I would be against it (despite agreeing with much of what she says). Rep. Dan Crenshaw on the other hand, If he gets a bit more experience under his belt I would be glad to have him as president.
I don't know if she's a viable presidential candidate but I do admire her very much. She is a strong, independent and talented woman who refuses to live on the liberal plantation run by the overseers of the Democrat party.
Hell no. Women should not be president of any nation. They shouldn't participate in politics either. Women are generally swayed more by emotions and hormones. Candice is no exception.
Its a man's job to set up a state and protect the people in that state. Women are not capable protectors.
I hardly know anything about her to even have an opinion about her.
I like her as far as her attitude and she's clearly a driven woman. But I doubt I would vote for her, unless she morphed over the years into a candidate I could actually get behind.
She has some good opinions... but i need to know more about her targets and opinions to answer that question.
Saw her interview on Joe Rogan. Jesus Christ is she unintelligent and unedicated.
2024 ? Wtf? ... got enough on America’s plate making sure pussy grabber is booted out in 2020
She is very smart and beautiful , I am not sure if I would vote for her it is to early to tell. Her views Is very different from a lot of people to say she is not smart is not right
After electing a reality tv star, a college dropout as the nominee would be a continuation of the grand intellectual tradition of the Republican Party.
I guess she'd barely be old enough then. We'll have to see. But, I do love Candace.
She seems good. Also she would just be old enough. I googled that she's born in April 1989, so she turns 35yo during the possible campaign.
I have no idea who she is, so I can not say at this point.
I would never vote for a woman President. Women have no business voting, let alone being political candidates.
If she was the nominee, yes, but I don't think she has enough experience to make it that far, at least not yet.
I would not vote for her if she was candidate here in the Netherlands. Not that she would realistically have any chance
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions