Should men be able to walk around with their ball-sack hanging out? Obviously girls can wear belly shirts, bikini, etc. and show off the region where their ovaries are contained, but guys are being oppressed by having to hide our testicles. What do you think? Why can women show theirs and men can’t show ours to little children in front of elementary schools and what not?
Eh dumbass you have the right to show the area where your ovaries are contained. We are not allowed to show the location that contains our testicles. Learn some basic anatomy you ignorant twerp.
this is an awesome question considering you're just fifteen. I think I've a neutral opinion (I don't particularly am fond of revealing clothes) but I've always supported women's rights and this hot debate happened to catch my eye.
If a lesbian in a hs can control herself amongst topless women around changing with her, I can't see why men CANNOT.
Uh... I'd feel very uncomfortable if I was walking around and saw another lady's breast bouncing as she walked. Plus, kids would see it and mother's might feel offended by it. I personally wouldn't, I don't feel comfortable seeing men do that either. On top of that, breasts have been deemed a sexual organ for years, lots of men would rape women or get a boner from seeing them.
I'm just saying. Not all men would do that, but it's the idiots that do that stop things from happening. That or women would be sexually harassed as well.
I think a man can control themself. I am bisexual and find boobs very sexy and hot but would not rape any women and it does not matter how high my sexual desires is for this woman would be
Sigh. Ladies, in all honesty. Get over it. Breasts are sexualized and have been since eons ago. It's not the end of the world and even if they are not counted as secondary sexual organs, fact remains that almost all girls enjoy many things done with and to their breasts during sex, and the exposure of them elicits arousal in all men.
Indecent exposure is not okay. No, it should not be legal for anyone, women included to strip publicly. Now when we're talking about official sites like nude beaches, it's a different story.
A ripped torso is neither a sexual organ, for the record. What if men suddenly told you to stop finding that sexual?
And I can respect that. But you must also be aware that you are a minority in that regard and so your own preference can't be used as an argument on the general.
Definitely. at least please make it acceptable to go around in bra. No need to go naked. My country is so fxxking hot and i envy my brother. He could go shirtless when there's guest in my house while i panicked looking for my clothes whenever a guest come to my house.
No, that would creep me out and I am a woman. Most importantly, why would any woman want to take their shirt off in public? Unless you're at a beach where they allow you to be topless, there's really no other place where it would be appropriate and I don't even think the beach is appropriate because there's kids there. Call me crazy but I like clothes lol and I'm happy to wear them.
It is already legal here and women don't even do it. Except for special events downtown such as proud parade or at the beach. I mean, we already have men and some women staring at us while we only show cleavage or have shirts that show our nipples, you want them to stare even more with our breast completely showing? Doesn't matter if it is a sexual organ or not. It has been sexualized already so people will stare lol
Yes. Bearing breasts in public wouldn't be common at all still, especially at first, and anywhere that men are expected to wear a shirt women would still be expected to wear one. But on the beach, park, pools, etc, it should be up to the woman if she wants to cover her breasts or not.
Sure, why not? We are all after all just animals. Animals do not wear clothing. I don't think it is about nipples, but the very breast itself. The sooner we desensitize people of female breasts, the sooner we can grow as people.
Honestly I'm not that bothered by it. Sure if we did have that most men will try and take advantage of it, but I feel over time everyone will get used to the fact that they are just a part of the body like everything else.
Would be great if that were the case, but I just don't think it can work. Imagine all the pedophilic creeps getting their fill from teenage girls and children walking around topless. I can't be on board with that.
No reason why a woman should 't be able to. Though, if I'm honest I'd prefer guys to keep their shirts on. So if I had to make the choice, I'd rather everyone kept them on than took them off
It's legal in most civilised places if it's not purposefuly intended to cause a disturbance. But of course most "topfreedom" "activists" are attention seeking dimwits who are only interested in causing a disturbance so they can whine about how "oppressed" they are by the Patriarchy.
I think so. I mean breasts are great and all, but they aren't sexual organs. If it means women can be more comfortable, then why not let them go shirtless?
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Personally, no. I just think it's inappropriate and frankly kind of trashy. Why is there a need for it, anyway? I don't want to see other women's breasts and I don't want anyone seeing mine.
Also, some hard to swallow pills: If you want to go around shirtless in public, you had better get used to men (and probably some women, too) staring at your breasts.
Stop your feminist bullshit. Breasts are sexually attractive, not only to men, but also to bi and lesbian girls. Wanna get the twins out? Fine, do it. But I'm gonna stare at it, and any person who feel attracted to women will do the same. Well, maybe not to yours, since you're 15, but other women are fine.
It seems really odd in our culture, but I'd get used to it. It's just what we are conditioned for. I think they would lose their power to MANipulate... so choose wisely! Mystery causes the suspense.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Breasts are indeed a secondary sex organ. Anyone who disagrees is just a drone of feminist psuedo-science. As an erogenous zone, you made a lot of false equivalences. You also need to acknowledge that the human female has unique breasts. The only species on the planet that has engorged breasts when they aren't lactating. Not even other primates are like this. They can serve multiple purposes. Just like how a male peacocks tail is meant to attract mates when the reason birds have tails to begin with are to stabilize them while flying, and yes peacocks fly
Study common sense. Your pseudo science is politically motivated like a good deal of psychology. Literally 0 evidence for your claims. Trust me, I've had idiotic feminists try this garbage argument before kid
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
158Opinion
Should men be able to walk around with their ball-sack hanging out? Obviously girls can wear belly shirts, bikini, etc. and show off the region where their ovaries are contained, but guys are being oppressed by having to hide our testicles. What do you think? Why can women show theirs and men can’t show ours to little children in front of elementary schools and what not?
BREASTS ARE NOT GENITALS MY FRIEND. Why is it so hard to understand this?
Eh dumbass you have the right to show the area where your ovaries are contained. We are not allowed to show the location that contains our testicles. Learn some basic anatomy you ignorant twerp.
Why do men show their disgusting chest?
@kim45456 For the same reason women show their disgusting ovary sack… Social expectations.
@kim45456 put your sack away and your chest as well lol...
this is an awesome question considering you're just fifteen. I think I've a neutral opinion (I don't particularly am fond of revealing clothes) but I've always supported women's rights and this hot debate happened to catch my eye.
If a lesbian in a hs can control herself amongst topless women around changing with her, I can't see why men CANNOT.
That's a pretty good point, I didn't think of the Lesbian analogy at all.
Uh... I'd feel very uncomfortable if I was walking around and saw another lady's breast bouncing as she walked. Plus, kids would see it and mother's might feel offended by it. I personally wouldn't, I don't feel comfortable seeing men do that either. On top of that, breasts have been deemed a sexual organ for years, lots of men would rape women or get a boner from seeing them.
Are you serious? Ev3n if you are nakef in front of a man, he does not allow to rape you
I'm just saying. Not all men would do that, but it's the idiots that do that stop things from happening. That or women would be sexually harassed as well.
You are accepting the problem that the man can rape you because of clothes. That is justifying rape
I honestly don't see how that justifies rape? I'm just saying it's a possibility.
No man have a right to rape you because of your clothes
I never said they had a right to, I just said it was possible.
I think a man can control themself. I am bisexual and find boobs very sexy and hot but would not rape any women and it does not matter how high my sexual desires is for this woman would be
Your basing everyone's reactions on yours? Yes, most men can control themselves, but what about the ones that don't and do it?
Sigh. Ladies, in all honesty. Get over it. Breasts are sexualized and have been since eons ago. It's not the end of the world and even if they are not counted as secondary sexual organs, fact remains that almost all girls enjoy many things done with and to their breasts during sex, and the exposure of them elicits arousal in all men.
Indecent exposure is not okay. No, it should not be legal for anyone, women included to strip publicly. Now when we're talking about official sites like nude beaches, it's a different story.
A ripped torso is neither a sexual organ, for the record. What if men suddenly told you to stop finding that sexual?
I don't care about abs and those stuff. I just find them aesthetically nice. I don't find that sexual.
And I can respect that. But you must also be aware that you are a minority in that regard and so your own preference can't be used as an argument on the general.
Definitely. at least please make it acceptable to go around in bra. No need to go naked.
My country is so fxxking hot and i envy my brother. He could go shirtless when there's guest in my house while i panicked looking for my clothes whenever a guest come to my house.
No, that would creep me out and I am a woman. Most importantly, why would any woman want to take their shirt off in public? Unless you're at a beach where they allow you to be topless, there's really no other place where it would be appropriate and I don't even think the beach is appropriate because there's kids there. Call me crazy but I like clothes lol and I'm happy to wear them.
It is already legal here and women don't even do it. Except for special events downtown such as proud parade or at the beach. I mean, we already have men and some women staring at us while we only show cleavage or have shirts that show our nipples, you want them to stare even more with our breast completely showing? Doesn't matter if it is a sexual organ or not. It has been sexualized already so people will stare lol
Where is this here... tell me the place.. i wana move there lol
Yes. Bearing breasts in public wouldn't be common at all still, especially at first, and anywhere that men are expected to wear a shirt women would still be expected to wear one. But on the beach, park, pools, etc, it should be up to the woman if she wants to cover her breasts or not.
Sure, why not? We are all after all just animals. Animals do not wear clothing. I don't think it is about nipples, but the very breast itself. The sooner we desensitize people of female breasts, the sooner we can grow as people.
Honestly I'm not that bothered by it. Sure if we did have that most men will try and take advantage of it, but I feel over time everyone will get used to the fact that they are just a part of the body like everything else.
Would be great if that were the case, but I just don't think it can work. Imagine all the pedophilic creeps getting their fill from teenage girls and children walking around topless. I can't be on board with that.
No reason why a woman should 't be able to. Though, if I'm honest I'd prefer guys to keep their shirts on. So if I had to make the choice, I'd rather everyone kept them on than took them off
It's legal in most civilised places if it's not purposefuly intended to cause a disturbance.
But of course most "topfreedom" "activists" are attention seeking dimwits who are only interested in causing a disturbance so they can whine about how "oppressed" they are by the Patriarchy.
I think so. I mean breasts are great and all, but they aren't sexual organs. If it means women can be more comfortable, then why not let them go shirtless?
Personally, no. I just think it's inappropriate and frankly kind of trashy. Why is there a need for it, anyway? I don't want to see other women's breasts and I don't want anyone seeing mine.
Also, some hard to swallow pills: If you want to go around shirtless in public, you had better get used to men (and probably some women, too) staring at your breasts.
Yeah I agree, women should be allowed to be shirtless. Breastfeeding women already whip them out in public anyways
Stop your feminist bullshit. Breasts are sexually attractive, not only to men, but also to bi and lesbian girls.
Wanna get the twins out? Fine, do it. But I'm gonna stare at it, and any person who feel attracted to women will do the same.
Well, maybe not to yours, since you're 15, but other women are fine.
🤨 weak. SIMPism is what is caused by fetish rather than mozaphillia😂
Since men do, then why not... We all know what's there! But ideally no-one would-keep some modesty and privacy, please
It seems really odd in our culture, but I'd get used to it. It's just what we are conditioned for. I think they would lose their power to MANipulate... so choose wisely! Mystery causes the suspense.
Breasts are indeed a secondary sex organ. Anyone who disagrees is just a drone of feminist psuedo-science. As an erogenous zone, you made a lot of false equivalences. You also need to acknowledge that the human female has unique breasts. The only species on the planet that has engorged breasts when they aren't lactating. Not even other primates are like this. They can serve multiple purposes. Just like how a male peacocks tail is meant to attract mates when the reason birds have tails to begin with are to stabilize them while flying, and yes peacocks fly
They are not sexual organs my friend, they are secondary sex characteristics. There's a big difference. Study biology.
men are waking up.. when will we act though. it'll be us or the guests that Feminism has invited
Study common sense. Your pseudo science is politically motivated like a good deal of psychology. Literally 0 evidence for your claims. Trust me, I've had idiotic feminists try this garbage argument before kid