What's Worse? Someone Without A Heart Or Without A Soul?

Question

This is not a post inviting Gender Bashing, so if that is/was your intention, PLEASE MOVE ON... This is about PEOPLE with no heart or soul and that don't discriminate by gender... THANKS 🙂

TCredo · Accepted Answer

Well shoot... I took this link because I wanted to gender bash... lol... (KIDDING - I know Toots knows this so that disclaimer is for everyone else lol)

I might be missing it here but I'd say one without the other is like having neither... of course there is the heartless soul which is bad... but a soulless heart a'int much better :)

JackSmy · Accepted Answer

Why would anyone choose to be with one that lacked either, or even both?
Why is this a question? Who would choose to have a 'soulless' person, with no values or ethics; or the 'heartless' kind, a cold, unfeeling, person, in their life?

DanaeAdam5 · Accepted Answer

Someone with no heart.  It doesn't matter if you have a body with soul if you don't have a heart

DizzyDesii · Accepted Answer

If you have no soul, you have no body, no heart... right? So thats worse

rjroy3 · Answer

Lol 100% better to have a Soul and be heartless. This is most people at different times. You have a soul and can have a good heart in one situation, while being heartless in another under the right circumstances. That's how soldiers function in war. You're heartless against your enemy for the good of your family friends and country. You have a heart but moments of heartlessness.

If you're souless you never have a soul. That doesn't come out here and there but disappear. We call these people psychopaths and usually to this degree become serial killers. They don't have a soul and while they have emotions. They're barely there and switch them off when it suits them. They only show acts of kindness when it benefits them in some way. That's souless but having a heart.

I'll take the Soulful asshole please

DiversityHire · Answer

From a spiritual perspective I can't fathom a separation between heart and soul. I don't think one can exist independently of the other.

1Sophisticatedme · Answer

Without a heart... a soul can be change over time... but a heart is with kindness and amazing when people show it, and people tend to take a very sweet honest person, than a person just walking with a glum personality that no one wants to be around.

Lliam · Answer

Not having a heart makes you a sociopath. I'm not sure what a soul is.

Porcelaine · Answer

Aren't they the same? To me both of those suggest someone cold and cruel

JesseCraft · Answer

Without a soul because then they could do anything. Like kill someone for example, if you don't have a heart then basically you don't care about how people feel

Kezzz · Answer

If you don't have a heart you are just heartless and lifeless. If you're without soul, you have emotions at least, if nothing else. So if say being heartless I'd the worst of the two.

Rabbit_Hole · Answer

What's worse? A car without a steering wheel or an engine? Both are needed to drive.

Avicenna · Answer

The one without a heart. That is the essence of us being human.

madgoat · Answer

I don't know what you mean by soul but lack of heart is not a nice way to live.

Jjpayne · Answer

I'd say a soul and heart are connected... But the word soul is stronger and more powerful to me, being a heartbreaker is not has bad as not having a soul

winterfox10 · Answer

Living without a soul is worse. If you don't have a soul, your heart will feel it.

Anonymous · Answer

My soul is everything, I feel with my soul.. My heart is just a pumping organ!

adidas0169 · Answer

Someone without a heart. bc you dont really care about anyone else

bannacookies · Answer

Soul.  The soul is everything, not just the heart, but everything.

simplelikeme · Answer

I don't think you could have one without the other 🤣🤣🤣

proteus912 · Answer

Someone without a heart. They wouldn't care about anyone

Anonymous · Answer

Maybe it's just because I don't believe in souls but I genuinely have no idea what this question is supposed to be asking. A heart is a physical thing you need to exist while a soul is a concept that may or may not be real, so I feel like the heart is more important?

EABsTUQ · Answer

Backdrop people

OddBeMe · Answer

Both souls and “hearts” are abstract ideas that are similar in most cultures. But everyone has a heart but not everyone is empathetic. So I’d go with that.

sukcitup · Answer

Soul I would say... Someone without soul will go to any extent to hurt someone

Tstrbrainer · Answer

A person without a soul won't turn to a ghost when dead 👻👻👻.  A person without a heart won't be alive in the first place 😉😉😉

OpenNudist · Answer

Do You Know What Is Worse? A US 7TH CALVARY SCOUT for 15 Years , Or a Very Professional Soldier That Is A PJ

FrePhill · Answer

Depends which life one lives for, after death or in the living.

teachsex2girls · Answer

Both as you need a soul to carry a heart

jimmy2 · Answer

We all have Souls its just some will not be with God forever

Anonymous · Answer

how can you have one but not the other? or how can one exist without the other?

MadBoy · Answer

Aren't they one and the same though?

SenseiSeptred · Answer

Both are just as bad as each other

Snakeyes7 · Answer

I always thought those were interchangable.

msc545 · Answer

Either one is really bad. Kind of a lot like Dump.

ChefPapiChulo · Answer

wtf?

Thaly · Answer

Without soul

Agape93 · Answer

A heart.

GreenGold1992 · Answer

without a heart

Machiavellio · Answer

Without soul

What's Worse? Someone Without A Heart Or Without A Soul?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Do you prefer to have a broken heart Or a heart in doubt?