I don't understand why this is a "movement"! I have seen women, openly breast-feeding babies, in restaurants, and I have no issue with it!
One, was actually sitting next to me, and I could see everything, and she asked me, if I was bothered! NO! Who would be! The most NATURAL THING EVER! We talked, and her husband was dealing with the other two kids.
The baby finished, and she asked if I could hold her, while she cleaned up and tucked in, and so on! TOTAL stranger, and holding her little baby!! Cutest little thing, until she threw up, a little, on my shoulder!
Why can't women be totally topless, anywhere a man can be? What is so "Horrible" about her nipples, that they need to be covered?
How often have you seen a wonderful lady, in a tight shirt, no bra, and delightfully hard nipples, pressing on the shirt? How is that so different that seeing them, without the shirt?
Most Helpful Opinions
I suppose I support it in principle, because I don't think it should be illegal for women to be topless in public. However, my reasoning doesn't come from a place of advocating "gender equality" (because men's nipples and women's breasts are not 1:1 comparable, as women's breasts are more sexually charged), but rather from a place of "the government shouldn't regulate what people can wear anyway". And I also think it's dumb for women to *want* to be topless in public, and I think if it were legal, it would still be exceedingly rare for women to exercise that right (just like it already is for men to be topless in public). But I do support it in principle. It should be an option.
What Guys Said
what happened to decency.
I'm all for some boobage but what kind of example does this set for your baby girls and boys? we look like trashy maniacs to outsiders. "bla bla who cares live free bla bla it's just boobs"
okay then let your daughter walk down the street with you topless and I'm sure you're not going to want the attention she'll be getting. imagine her alone the odds of her getting raped are skyrocketed. what about professionalism don't you want your wife and daughter to be seen as a beautiful respectful woman and seen with respect and dignity?
we're living in a critical time in history where being and looking trashy is attractive and acceptable.
very dangerous timeSure but I’m a guy I’ll just look at boobs and thing wonder what down there is like.
men are different then women, men would love to see every women’s boobs it’s a turn on for us, We love ass and pussy, why nicotine just have then uncovered so we can all see,
women if you see a guy full 6 pack abs god like figure you probably want to see him naked, if it’s me no , I’m not a big fat guy but not a 6 pack guy either, your ladies probably don’t want to see me naked, This is the difference between men and women’s view on sexI support it, its reciculous that men can be free but women have to cover their nipples. I support people dressing or looking however they like, and breasts aren't a sexual organ anyways, if they could at least be consistent, sexual organs you cover up. But I’d support it being legal to wear no clothes at all if thats what people wanted to, cleanliness would be my only issue, if too many people that dont bathe walk naked in public, than maybe that should be reversed, but its not the governments job to make people wear clothing. Let people decide on their own.
No. Breasts are sexualized. Guy's pecs can be, but not in the same way. Some women claim to orgasm from nipper stimulation, some women says they enjoy nipper sucking more than sex. Men's nipper and women's nipples simply aren't the same thing.
Though if you want my opinion, I think guys should keep their shirts on, anyways.For fun yes, because it means more titties out.
But in reality, no. I'm tired of this bullshit trying to pretend men and women are exactly the same, and a woman getting her boobs out in public is the same.
That would also mean we'd get grannies tits out. Who wants to see that?
And more seriously, it would mean underage girls tits out. And I'm certainly NEVER accepting that.Yes, to do so affirms your belief in the underlying natural inherited human response
and opposes the religiously-promulgated 'sin' and enforced de-emphasis of innate NATURAL animal heredity.
Telling a lie often enough DOESN'T make it 'true'; its validity eventually 'bleeds through
like a pernicious stain, white-washed!No. We don't need to have erections everywhere we go, like in schools or libraries or the office, because a small percentage of women are entitled and narcissistic (not saying OP is). That's inappropriate and we don't have nudity in most societies for a reason. I'll support "Free the nipple" once society supports "free the testicles," though in all honesty, I'd probably move to another country if either ever happened.
I think that this is one reason men dont respect women. I fully support breast feeding in public but the free the nipple movement is more about girl-power than anything else. I have no use for people like them that constantly make noise and claim victimhood. I wouldn't piss in their faces if they were on fire
How is that women empowerment?
Like How?
I don't support such dumb causes.
I support real issues that feminists raise like how women are treated in many Arabic countries etc.Fuck yes. Free all the tatas. Actually this topic causes mixed emotions. Because although id love to see all nips on women i also have 2 young daughters and i know if a woman with amazing breasts is walking shirtless im going to compliment her and because im good looking id work in asking to touch them. i dont want some perv seeing my kids tits when they are young. It could also spark a rise in rape victims
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!