No free media, just state run media
They want you to bow down to the government
Be poor uneducated stupid ass kissers
In the govts of the 20th century…yes. Stalin and Mao are not that different from Hitler. They all had absolute power. Doesn’t matter the tiny window dressings of their labels.
Doesn’t mean all “communist” govts are fascist. But there’s a relation.
Both hate freedom and want you to ass kiss the dear leader
They are certainly more the same than they are different
Opinion
20Opinion
No. They are not. Though the methods of Fascism and Communism are often the same, their theoretical foundations are quite different.
Communism was a romantic reaction to the Enlightenment. To wit, the idea of the Enlightenment was that man was a spontaneously rational and social being. That he had rights, rooted in nature.
However, man has been corrupted by institutions that evolved over history but that were not inherently rational and therefore not consistent with his natural rights.
The idea behind the Enlightenment then was that man must be stripped of the illogical and irrational/pre-rational sources of his identity - i. e. religion, ethnicity, tribe, etc. - and law made in conformity with his natural rights. When law and natural rights are consistent, man will live in harmonious relationship with his fellows.
The problem. of course, was that man gets his sense of identity from religion, family, tribe, nationality, etc. When stripped of these - as the British statesman and political philosopher put it - man is "reduced to his naked shivering nature."
Into this stepped Marx. In brief summation, he combined man's need for a sense of identity with a "scientific theory." He discerned a dialectic in History - with a capital "H" - in which economics and class was the source of man's true identity and that the clash of owning and working classes would result over time in a stateless utopia where man lived in fulfillment of his nature.
This, of course, was not scientific at all. It greatly oversimplified man's nature and, in practice - and this is skipping over a LOT of important detail - conduced to the concentration of power in an elite whose job, in Marxist theory, was to guide the workers toward that classless utopia that - allegedly - History was moving toward anyhow. In policy terms, this conduced to the abolition of private property, government ownership of the means of production and a centrally planned economy.
Fascism, by contrast, said, unlike Socialism, that man was not working toward a classless stateless Utopia. Rather, man derives his entire sense of self from the state. Thus man is a cog in the machine of the state, with the state sitting at the pinnacle and the head of the state being, in effect, the head of the whole enterprise. Not unlike the president of a corporation is the final authority in the corporation. (Hence also why the term "corporatist state" is sometimes applied to Fascism.)
Also, note, contrary to the popular conflation, Fascism and National Socialism (Naziism) are NOT the same things. National Socialism is actually more related to socialism, only replacing race and the survival of the fittest for socialism class and class warfare as the source of man's identity and the driving force of History.
In fact, the reason for the brutal rivalry between Socialism and National Socialism is that they were arguing about the nature of reality as understood by the Socialists. It was a fight within the family, so to speak. Whereas Fascism posited a different theoretical foundation that rejected both class and race as sources of division within the state.
Indeed, it is notable that Mussolini's National Fascist Party was initially supported by many prominent Italian Jews. Fascism only taking on an anti-Semitic cast as Italy began to lose the Second World War and grew increasingly dependent on Nazi Germany.
Again, to be sure, all three - Communism, Fascism and National Socialism - are totalitarian dictatorships and thus their methods overlapped. Socialism abolished private property. Fascism permitted it, but the private businesses were as obliged to follow the dictates of the state in practice as any business under Socialism.
That all said, similarity of method should not obscure their theoretical differences. Those differences being the source of much of their rivalries and thus much history.
According to Benito Mussolini, "Therefore, for the Fascist, all is in the state and nothing human or spiritual exists much less has value outside the state."
"Its (fascism's) functions cannot... be limited to those of enforcing order and keeping the peace, as the liberal doctrine had it. Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of Liberalism, both in the political and the economic sphere." "The keystone of the Fascist doctrine is its conception of the State, of its essence, its functions, and its aims. For Fascism the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative..."
All quotes taken from Moussolini's essay "The Doctorine of Fascism" or "La Doctorina del Fascismo" in Italian.
According to Giovanni Gentile the philosopher who invented fascism, basically the Karl Marx of fascism, "Fascism as a consequence of its Marxian and Sorelian (Jacobin French Revolutionist) patrimony... conjoined with the influence of contemporary Italian idealism, through which Fascist thought attained maturity, conceives philosophy as praxis." Origini e dottrina del fascismo, Rome (1929) p. 58 Basically fascism was a form of Neo-Marxism with what was at the time "modern" idealism, nationalism and philosophy. While it is very much Anti-Liberal, it is not right wing it is from the same leftists that spawned the French Revolution and Marxism.
Seeing how nazi Germany and Russia communists was at war with each other seems at odds then the same.
Hitler wanted to colonize Russia as a failed state as he made mein kampf in a jail cell before coming to power, just before the communists revolution. How ironic Russia was the one that rolled over Berlin.
In modern day we have "tankies" being Americans that sucks Russia and Chinese dick. That had a communists revolution but backwards into an authoritarian regime like what you are saying being Fascism.
So to really answer your question, it's more of a horseshoe imagery.
You mistook "Marxism-Leninism" with Communism, but that's fine - most people do that, especially Americans.
No, they are not. Communism is great at its core, but it's hard to execute it properly because of corrupted people that only want power. Economically - you are abolishing classes and thus taking money from the wealthy ones and giving them to the poor.
Fascism is all about racism and nationalism - you give money to both the poor and the wealthy, but you take it from people of different races or ethnicity. Italy > Lybia, Ethiopia, Germany > Jews and so on.
They’re not the same but Semoia both of them rely on government ownership of your ride to do what you would like to do. They’re different and the fact that fascism relies on more corporate progressive censorship aka fascism where communism is directly from government
Not explicitly.
Also, I find it weird how Fascism is characterized as "far-right" when pretty much every communist revolution mirrored Hitler.
To me, fascism isn't left nor right, but a rigid and aggressive form of authoritarianism. I find it stupid to say that only Hitler and Mousillini were fascists and not Mao, the Kims, Stalin, or Castro.
So by my definition I don't know if we've seen an instance of communism that wasn't fascist.
They are not the same. They are like running a marathon and riding a mountain bike for miles and miles. Either way at the end you get tired.
Nah, they are the same. Both are anti freedom and want you to ass kiss the dear leader
The fundamentals are completely different in both. Although nearly every example of both have ended up similarly. 1984 is a good example of that. But if you examine the core beliefs of both then they are not
That's as daft as suggesting bathing and running are "the same," because both get you wet all over.
Stay in school, kid. Pay attention in classes, you're not learning much as it is.
Nah, they are the same. Both are anti freedom and want you to ass kiss the dear leader
Fascism is extreme right and Communism is extreme left. You should have learned that in high school. Also what I have been saying. They don't teach kids anything in school. Hitler hated communism. You really know how to show your ignorance.
They have soo many things in common. Both hate freedom/human rights and want you to ass kiss the dear leader. Plus both have state run media.
US has a state run media now. The media is just part of the Democrat Party. Protecting Democrats and lying about Republicans. Telling the American people lies to scare them. Using made up sources to make up stories.
Oh like Fox, Newsmax and OANN is the state media for the Republicans
Only Fox could be rated major and they turned on trump and help liberal media
Actually liberals run fox. They hired a bunch liberals as newscasters. Ryan runs it and he is a liberal , not conservative
Fascism mean the people of the country to dedicate to theyr nation
Communism mean to share evrething in the nation whit the people in the nation.
They are two different ideologies. But they look similar because at the end there's no freedom and people are supposed to bow down to the leader because criticizing the leader would get them killed.
They are not the same. But anyway neither of them do any good.
'noooh, its different when my extremists dictators take away your rights, we do it for your good'
Pretty much the same thing. Get used to it!! Chairman Joe's bringing here VERY soon!!!
Same but different. Both end up with the same result. A dead broke country with no freedom
Kind of, one is transparent, the other one's corrupt
Tyranny is tyranny.
Minor variance of flavor but still tyranny.
Fascism generally has a cult leader aspect to it that communism lacks. e. g. mussolini, hitler, trump.
How about North Korea?
Trump was fair and not a Fascist. If so , you would be in prison now. Media would be in jail too or dead. You need to study fascist leaders and what they did.
@888theGreat trump would've done all of that if he could. but there's this thing called the constitution and the judicial system that prevented. quit being so gullible.
At least fascists are honest about it.
Similar but no
Nope
Nah, they are the same. Both are anti freedom and want you to ass kiss the dear leader
Nope
They are both freaking terrible
The communism youve been brainwashed to hate is not real communism
No. They’re not.
Both are anti freedom and want people to give up their rights to ass kiss the government
Anti freedom in what sense? Many would consider the eradication of equality in itself to be a form of freedom, whereas others believe that the only way to maintain and maximize freedom within a society is to rigidly enforce it. You believe that the absence of government is freedom, and I think many would consider that naive.
*eye roll*
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions