- 469 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySo I work in health care and I'm not going to get into whether I think people should choose to be vaccinated and all the of the controversy about that. However, in this subject on constituationality of federal mandates I'm alittle confused as to why the majority opinion on the supreme court is that it's unconstitutional for OSHA or the Biden administration to make a mandate but not unconstitutional for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to make a mandate of health care workers. That makes a little nervous because when I worked in Long Term Care (nursing homes) many residents could get ill from other residents living in the nursing home does this mean CMS can mandate that nursing home residents be vaccinated as well, stating resident safety? Like I said I'm referring only the the constitutionality of mandates by federal agencies. They are using patient safety as the argument as if Covid is the only patient safety risk a health care worker could have to patients, what about health care workers that are colonized with MRSA, they post a risk to patients particulalry if standard precautions are not utilized but so far there are not federal mandates that MRSA colonized healthcare workers cannot work in healthcare etc. and would be difficult to know if they utilized the appropriate precautions every time. And so far this is just Covid were talking about has CMS mandated other vaccines that put patients at risk, they must not have because some hospitals did not require every employee to be vaccinated with flu vaccine. So that's just my two cents on this subject.
01 Reply- +1 y
Because the government funds healthcare.
The court basically said that when an entity accepts federal funding, the government can dictate the rules.
Most Helpful Opinions
- 475 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think it is in line with the constitution. I mean forcing people to take a medicine that is STILL experimental… I am fully vaxxed, my whole family is. But my mom is a doctor and she understood how it worked, and knew that it’s not going to “change” your DNA, that it was safe, and the benefits outweighed the risks from contracting Covid 19. But most people don’t have that luxury. I don’t agree with the vax hesitant people, but I DO understand their concerns, (which are born out of medical ignorance, mostly). So maybe instead of mandating we take the vaccine or be banned from working or getting an education, the government should have done a better job of communicating the risks and benefits? I’ll say this…. This BS of telling us once we are vaxxed we can return to a full, maskless life like before, then reinstate the mask mandate, (even though the head of CDC, Rochelle Wollinsky, called masks little more than “facial decoration” on CNN) and then require private employers to fire anyone without full vaccination certainly seems like an end run around the constitution, and apparently the supreme court agreed! I’m ALL in favor of getting vaxxed, I just question the authoritarian way that they went about it. Oh god! Let the trolls begin their attack!
514 Reply- +1 y
@CrazyGirl2 You have a great understanding of this. The rollout was definitely botched and when Biden tried to demonize the people that would not get vaccinated and then tried to force them to do it just made them dig in deeper. Thats what Americans do when their rights are threatened. Educating the public and explaining the benefits of the vaccine and being transparent about it would have yielded better results.
- +1 y
"the government should have done a better job of communicating the risks and benefits"
You've got to bear in mind there's a whole industry out there that makes money by misinforming people and telling them that the government is lying. (It's not that the government never lies, but they're not in this case.)
It also sounds a lot like the question "why haven't the Democrats managed to get anything passed?", which isn't true, for a start, and 99% of the reason is that Republicans just aren't going to vote for anything they wouldn't have proposed themselves, no matter how much their constituents want or need it. - +1 y
- +1 y
@goaded Pitifully, that's a true statement, which is why the basic 2 party system is complete failure. It has been for a long time, but your can really thank Newt Gingrich for the current situation. He's the man directly responsible for making "compromise" a dirty fucking word and changing its meaning to "weakness and lack of conviction". To be fair, I suppose you can also blame anyone who believed him.
- +1 y
@exitseven There are daily press briefings from the White House. They're informative and don't include any "alternative facts". Trump's administration went over a year without holding a single one, from March 11, 2019. They're not televised as much, that's all, but you can find transcripts here: www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/
(The Trump page is trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/ ) - +1 y
- +1 y
@loveslongnails It made for good television, though.
- +1 y
- +1 y
@loveslongnails Ratings over country! (I missed your comment about Newt "I'm going to impeach a president for lying about sex while cheating on my dying wife" Gingrich; dead on.)
- +1 y
- +1 y
@loveslongnails I can remember the outrage about how the Republicans decided on impeachment then desparately worked to find an excuse. I wonder how things would have worked out if they had convicted Clinton. He did actually break a law, after all, even if it was one that almost certainly wouldn't have been prosecuted by anyone without a political axe to grind.
Al Gore would have finished out Clinton's second term, and unless he was completely incompetent would have won in 2000 (he was within 500 votes of doing so anyway), especially as there would have been outrage from Democrats over Republicans impeaching a popular president over practically nothing.
Gore would have taken the threat of OBL seriously, so there might not even have been 9/11, and no 20 years of war... - +1 y
- +1 y
@loveslongnails Yeah, sometimes following the law sucks. But it's the difference between democracy and dictatorships.
- +1 y
Ok um I don't want to offend anyone so this my opinion and it's quite long Joe fucking Biden can kiss my ass Trump 2022 and the hole COVID-19 is a scam just like the fake people that scam real people for money and other stuff and the vaccine is not safe it kills people lots of people yeah u can say all u want but nothing u r going to say will change my mind and that's another thing the reason that our world is so upside down and divide is because of the God damn media they would they can't keep their 👃 out of other people's business that is why our world is not safe anymore and pretty soon our the media will be going through people's SSN and other deeper personal shit like who did u have sex with last night I mean come on don't u see if keep this up we will just have to shoot ourselves dead anyways this not the way I want my life to be I want to be able to go outside nude and not have to worry about what the fuck other people think u know we used to live in a free world now we don't so if u don't like what I'm saying then please keep your opinions or comments to yourself and or better yet In the famous words of Thumper if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all
10 Reply
601 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I am happy it was deemed Unconstitutional. No one should be forced to get the vaccine. People have learned nothing from history. This is exactly what the Germans did with the Jews. Also the vaccine doesn't work, and I know 2 people that were killed by the vaccine and my uncle almost had a heartattack becauseit caused fluid to build up around his heart, and I know 2 people that died from the health complications after getting over covid. With that said I still believe that all this mask and vaccine stuff is not working or even possibly making it worse. Also why arnt Doctors letting people who get covid that are over the age 40 know about the monoclonal antibodies? They need administered before 10 days after symptoms develope. Both that died from the complications after covid were not told by their Doctors about it, they didn't know about it and we had to tell them, then they asked their Doctors, then the doctors said "oh yeah we can schedule you for that".
I smell lots of Doctors are in on making covid look as deadly as possible for incentives from the government or at least the pharmaceutical companies or the left.00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
72Opinion
+1 yThe Supreme Court made the right choice! Can't force people to get the vaccine if they don't want it or don't believe it really works. I'm not vaccinated, but that's because of personal reasons and I don't believe it really works that well. I'm not getting it unless I know more info on it or there's gonna be a better one eventually. I also just had covid recently and I'm doing well now. Mine didn't even last that long. Sure the first few days were rough and I l couldn't get out of bed, but after about a week I started to get my strength back slowly but surely and it just felt like a regular head cold. When I came back to work after having covid, I got a letter from HR about the mandate and I was sooo scared that it was really happening and that meant I had to choose between the vaccine or a weekly covid test which obviously I'm still NOT getting the vaccine. I was already choosing to get the weekly test and that it was gonna start next month, but then literally the next day after my shift ended and was about to go to bed, that's when I heard that the Supreme Court is now against it. I felt sooo relieved! It's a miracle! When I saw an article about it, I was like "FREEDOM!!!" Because if they still went with it, that would mean going against our freedom and rights. Now I know that there's still hope! And that they do care about our freedom and rights. It's not my business if you choose to get it or not. We're allowed to make our own choices and decisions! Now I can also go to work without having to worry about the mandate. Honestly it's a huge relief that they're against it! Now they gotta get biden out of the office!
20 Reply
+1 yIt's something that EVERYONE should be breathing a sigh of relief over. Even if you're somehow in favor of the mandates, allowing it to pass would be setting a precedent more horrifying than the Dredd Scott case. We'd be halfway to China in the space of one ruling.
41 Reply- +1 y
Absolutly
+1 yIt is a delicate issue. There is no easy solution to deal with COVID, despite what the so-called experts claim. However, this world is becoming more authoritarian every day. I'm glad to hear that the Supreme Court is still upholding some personal freedoms. As a side note, I work in healthcare. EVERY patient I've seen with severe (life threatening) COVID symptoms in the last 2 months has been unvaccinated. I want people to have a choice. I also hope that people make the right choice to get vaccinated unless they have a good reason not to do so.
30 Reply- 563 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yConservative court will give conservative opinions. The court is occupied by anti government-interventionists. Less government is good.
However, their opinion makes no logical sense. Childhood vaccines are mandated nationwide for children to go to school. This is a vaccine for people to go to school and to work and to prevent spreading sickness.
It would have meant 82 million people would've had to get vaccinated or provide weekly PCR tests. That might've gotten us up to the 70 percent mark that has been so highly touted, but we'll never get to...
it's tiresome.26 Reply- +1 y
Do tell about the 70% mark.
What will that accomplish?
The vaccine does not stop the spread of the virus. - +1 y
@BillyBalls The vaccine prevents serious illness and death. Masking, social distance and hand washing prevent spread. N 95 masking, not pitiful paper masks or thin cloth masks. And if EVERYONE had initially gotten vaccinated, to about 80 percent of the population, we would have had very few breakthrough cases or variants because the illness would've been stopped in its tracks to begin with.
How many measles outbreaks are there? Usually only in school settings and always precipitated by unvaccinated people bringing the illness. And the vaccine DOES prevent the illness, otherwise 100% of the vaccinated would be getting sick.
What I find interesting is how people say vaccination isn't working but they don't consider which vaccinated people are getting sick: Is it immunocompromised vaxxed? Is it people who are working with unvaccinated people 40 hours a week? Is it people working in hospitals with Covid patients 40-60 hours a week?
73% of hospitalized patients are unvaccinated. 27% of vaccinated folk get infected. So about 30 percent of the unvaccinated appear to not have been exposed or may have some immunity. About 30% of vaccinated people are getting sick. Has anyone asked HOW vaccinated they vaxxed are? Are we talking about people with ONE shot. They considered vaccianted, but their resistance to covid is minimal. Two shots? They should be OK if they've been vaxxed in the past six months. Three shots? Most unusual UNLESS the ill person is compromised or older. - +1 y
Covid and measles vaccines are not the same class of drugs so there is no comparison.
The measles vaccine lasts a lifetime.
Plus there was no guranty that the Covid vaccine would prevent infections no matter what percent of the population got the shot.
What you posted was ill informed misinformation.
Stop spreading lies!!! - +1 y
@BillyBalls Ill informed? I am FULL of information that I seek to back up my statements.
First off, there is absolutely NO perfect lifetime vaccination. There are breakthrough cases all the time especially with illnesses like measles. Vaccination covers 85% of WORLD populations. That is an incredible statistic. This means 82% of people are generally protected from death and severe illness IF infected. This is quite close to the protection from Covid 19 that vaccinatioin has afforded so far, despite the fact that so many fewer people are innoculated.
If you look at the Mayo Clinic map of the U. S. only 22 states and P. R. are at the 70% MINIMAL threshold for good protection. Eight states are near that threshold,. And medical pundits have said 80% is the actual threshold for solid protection from Covid 19..
Covid 19 vaccination has afforded nearly that protection despite the fact that it is such a new vaccine and so few people have had it. In Africa and the Middle East 5% or fewer people have been vaccinated. And with so many unvaccinated people circulating in an incredibly mobile population, the vaccinated will keep getting assaulted with infection from the unvaccinated.
- +1 y
In the U. S. people cross borders all the time. Witness the surge from the recent holidays. The New England states are highly vaccinated and so is New York, yet they have suffered from Thanksgiving to January from high percentages of cases because people refuse to wear masks around people whose vax, illness or exposure status is unknown. Also, people wear inferior masks, not the N-95s, which are still readily availible, but cost about $2 apiece.
In addition, people rely upon testing that is ALSO fallible. It appears that there is some traction about omicron germs being more plentiful in the throat than in the nose, so false negatives might be possible. Home tests are less sensitive, and it's difficult to even get home tests, supplies are low and costs high, and PCR test waiting can last for hours. People give up. Also there are the stealth infectors: those who are asymptomatic.
Add to this the problem of VIGILANCY. Do you keep your mask on around EVERYBODY you don't know or is not in your "pod" 100% of the time? Is it an N-95? Do you change it once it becomes damp? Do you never eat out? Do you not allow people you do not know into your home unmasked who are not in your pod? I'm talking workers who are performing a service. Do you ask people what their vaccine status is before they come into your home?
- +1 y
These are all uncomfortable issues that invade people's privacy, but protect everyone. Until we all become wise to what vaccines CAN do, which is not perfect, but can be excellent when we all are vaxxed, and we accept that because of this pandemic, we have to be uncomfortable about statuses and about protecting ourselves, progress is going to be grindingly slow.
Until we can get everyone to regularly test, say every 10 days, and have the costs covered by insurance and the government with free tests, outbreaks will reoccur during major holidays when people traditionally visit family, or when people travel to states where infection rates are high, or where no one properly masks or keeps social distance.
Yeah, I don't think the government should hold that kind of power. I think individual businesses have that right, and can implement whatever mandates they like. If you don't like a private company's policies, whether they be pro or anti vaccination, then move on.
50 Reply
+1 yThis is the right call. Maybe it would be different if the vaccines had passed stage IV of the FDA approval process, which usually takes 5-10 years. It should be up to the person whether they risk the disease or the jab because we don’t fully understand either. Not to mention the vaccine doesn’t stop the spread anymore. And omicron deaths are extremely low. So I the MANDATE is not necessary, not effective and not legal. But I do think people should get the vaccine generally to avoid hospital strain. But hospitals need to get their employees back…. which is a whole different issue
20 Reply
+1 yI agree with it.. The minute you start letting the government mandate people's healthcare decisions, we're fucked as a nation.. Well even more than we already are 🤷🏼♀️
83 Reply- +1 y
A hard truth
- +1 y
@UsernameXLTX sad but true
5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It was the obvious outcome, though the fact they upheld the mandate on healthcare workers at facilities receiving funding for Medicaid and Medicare was a weird move since it essentially leaves the door open to pass the same or other mandates through other means, most notably simply passing it through the house and Senate. Ultimately, the fact the same measure had already gone through that process and floundered in the senate was the primary argument used against OSHA to prove it had overstepped itself. Optimistically, this will result in other government agencies having their authority revised, but it's pretty doubtful. Unfortunately, barely half of the justices seem to even pretend to approach issues from a constitutionality standpoint, Roberts just wants to be on the majority/winning side of a debate regardless of outcome, and the liberal appointees are basically there just to support whatever their party tells them to.
00 Reply
+1 yNot familiar with it, and even though I am in support of people getting vaccinated, I'm not sure how I feel about forcing vaccines on unwilling parties. Polio had it's share of lost life before vaccines were available, and would still be claiming lives if people didn't take advantage of the vaccines, my parents included, taking me to the doctor too get vaccinated as a child and teenager. People don't remember polio, but it's still around, and treatments still are not as effective as vaccines are. How much resistance are people going to continue to have against a tiny shot that can do so much in protection against pandemics from yesteryear or today?
00 Reply
+1 yThere's only two answers you're gonna get from this question. People who do not like government controlling private enterprise (one of the literal definitions of fascism) will be happy. People who are totalitarians (fascists, communists, socialists) will see this as an inefficiency, and justification as to why the State needs more power.
20 Reply1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No one should be forced to get a vaccine if they're not comfortable with it. Does the vaccine help? Maybe. Although a lot of people who have it have still been struck with COVID, some even fatally. I'm vaccinated and even I am sick of all these jabs trying to be forced on people. If someone doesn't want it they shouldn't be man-handled into getting it.
40 Reply1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Regardless of anyone’s personal opinion on vaccine mandates, those OSHA rules were never meant to address public health issues. States can mandate vaccines but the federal government cannot. Biden was attempting to creatively interpret those rules to achieve what he can’t directly do.
40 Reply1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I believe it's a Government of the people by the people and for the people.
no Government should have that kind of power,110 Reply
+1 yThe mandate would be equal to claiming something which evidently isn't true. That the only thing we need do to be safe from covid is vaccinate. But even people with a third shot are now spreading among themselves. Further, as I read people for medical or religious reasons in healthcare staff would've been exempt in any case. This could be hundred of thousands of people which seems to nullify the point of a mandate to me regardless. Overall, people have a right to decide what does and does not go into their system, especially concerning half-cooked and fallacious vaccines of which a multitude of variances with unpredictable results depending on the person, now seem to circulate.
00 Reply- 5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe Biden administration overstepped. But they were testing the boundaries.
The Federal government has no right to dictate to private businesses when it comes to vaccination policy.
That power resides with the States only. Each state has a right to decide whether or not they will mandate companies to comply. Some companies may see fit to punish companies that do. Others may seek to punish those that don't.
But that is a States' rights issue.35 Reply- +1 y
Worded that wrong. "Some states may see fit to punish companies that do".
Other may seek to punish those that don't. - +1 y
@Fuentes Oh, that's only because you don't read what I post. I would wager most people here have no understanding of what is written in the U. S. Constitution. Or even why we have the document in the first place.
Most are against this make-believe issue of mandates because of their belief in a certain politics, not because they have any real principles or values, right? So like when trump was trying to pass legislation or executive actions to punish states for their stance with respect to the virus, that was perfectly fine to them because they want to "stick it to the libs".
Whereas I even my beliefs about the virus and vaccinations, cannot override my faith in the principles enshrined in our Constitution. And precious few here can even understand what principle I am articulating when I say that, "we" decided most governmental functions would be carried out at the individual state level.
They seem to lock in on the word mandate and not understand the word is relative. You can have nationwide mandates, state mandates, county mandates, and city/town mandates. We decided when this nation was formed, the state was the place where most of these decisions would be made, for as long as they did not violate the rights enshrined in the Constitution. - +1 y
Key takeaways:
• Another hypocritical idiot asshole Democrat Nazi who thinks they know what's best for society
• Thank God the Founding Fathers established three branches of the Federal government to make it difficult for one person to gain too much control
• And people called Trump a dictator?30 Reply5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Your question is incorrect.
There were 2 vaccine mandates.
1. One was for large employees. That was the one that the SCOTUS ruled against.
2. The second was for healthcare organizations like hospitals. That was supported by the SCOTUS.15 Reply- +1 y
SCOTUSblog is a highly respected non-partisan blog covering the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) written by lawyers and others in the legal industry.
Here is how they reported it:
=======
www.scotusblog.com/.../
OPINION ANALYSIS
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers
By Amy Howe
on Jan 13, 2022 at 4:41 pm
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Supreme Court on Thursday put the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers on hold, while litigation over its legality continues in the lower courts. Over a dissent from the court’s three liberal justices, the court ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration exceeded its power in issuing the mandate. Congress may have given OSHA the power to regulate workplace dangers, the court explained, but it “has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly.” At the same time, the justices – by a vote of 5-4 – granted the administration’s request to be allowed to temporarily enforce a vaccine mandate for health care workers at facilities that receive federal funding.
The orders that the justices issued on Thursday afternoon were the latest chapter in the fast-moving vaccine disputes. After the cases came to the Supreme Court in December on an emergency basis, the justices opted to expedite the cases for oral argument on whether the mandates can remain in place while the challenges proceed in the lower courts. The court heard nearly four hours of arguments on the policies on Jan. 7 and issued a pair of unsigned opinions just six days later.
(more) - +1 y
The OSHA case
OSHA issued the vaccine-or-test mandate at the center of National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor in November. It required all employers with 100 or more employees – roughly two-thirds of the private sector – to compel those employees to either be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or to be tested weekly and wear masks at work. The government expected the mandate to cover 84 million workers.
Businesses, states, and nonprofits went to court to challenge the mandate, and on Thursday the Supreme Court granted their request to put it on hold. Describing the mandate as a “significant encroachment into the lives — and health — of a vast number of employees,” the court emphasized that Congress must speak clearly if it intends to give a federal agency the authority to “exercise powers of vast economic and political significance.”
In this case, the court continued, Congress did not. It gave the Department of Labor the power to establish safety standards for the workplace, rather than “broad public health measures.” Although COVID-19 “is a risk that occurs in many workplaces,” the court acknowledged, it isn’t a risk that workers encounter simply by virtue of being at work – COVID-19 spreads virtually anywhere that people gather. “Permitting OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life — simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same risks while on the clock — would significantly expand OSHA’s regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization,” the court concluded. And indeed, the court noted, the fact that OSHA has never adopted a similar regulation is a “telling indication” that the vaccine-or-test mandate exceeds the agency’s power.
(more) - +1 y
The court then turned briefly to each side’s description of the effects of the policy. The challengers, the court observed, contended that the mandate would cost the states and employers billions of dollars and would prompt hundreds of thousands of employees to quit. The Biden administration, on the other hand, argued that the mandate would “save over 6,500 lives and prevent hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations.” But in the end, the court posited, other government actors – who are politically accountable – must “weigh such tradeoffs,” rather than the justices.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan penned a rare joint dissent in which they complained that employees, “more than any others,” have “little control, and therefore little capacity to mitigate risk” from the spread of COVID-19. The majority’s ruling, they contended, “stymies the Federal Government’s ability to counter the unparalleled threat that COVID-19 poses to our Nation’s workers.”
The dissenters tackled the same question that was at the heart of a concurring opinion filed by Justice Neil Gorsuch (and joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito): Who should decide how to respond to the pandemic? For Gorsuch, the “answer is clear”: the states and Congress. The dissenters reached a very different conclusion: OSHA, with its expertise in workplace safety and its status as a politically accountable government agency, is better suited to make decisions about how to protect workers from COVID-19 than “a court, lacking any knowledge of how to safeguard workplaces, and insulated from responsibility for any damage it causes.”
The vaccine-or-test mandate will remain on hold while the challenges to its legality continue in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.
(more) - +1 y
The health care vaccine case
In Biden v. Missouri, the justices agreed to allow the Biden administration to enforce nationwide a rule that requires nearly all health care workers at facilities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they qualify for a medical or religious exemption. The Department of Health and Human Services issued the rule, which applies to more than 10 million workers, in November, but two federal district courts – in Missouri and Louisiana – put the rule on hold in roughly half the states.
In an unsigned opinion, the court emphasized that a key responsibility of the Department of Health and Human Services is “to ensure that the healthcare providers who care for Medicare and Medicaid patients protect their patients’ health and safety.” To do so, HHS has long required those providers to comply with a variety of conditions if they want to receive Medicare and Medicaid funding. Because COVID-19 “is a highly contagious, dangerous, and — especially for Medicare and Medicaid patients — deadly disease,” HHS determined that a vaccine mandate was necessary to protect patients because it would decrease the chances that health care workers would both contract the virus and pass it on to their patients. Such a mandate, the court wrote, “fits neatly within” the power given to HHS by Congress.
(more) - +1 y
Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Alito, Gorsuch, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Thomas complained that the Biden administration “proposes to find virtually unlimited vaccination power, over millions of healthcare workers, in” what he described as a “hodgepodge” of statutes – “in definitional provisions, a saving clause, and a provision regarding long-term care facilities’ sanitation procedures.” The Biden administration had not adequately explained, as far as Thomas was concerned, why Congress would have given HHS such power in relatively minor provisions. And indeed, Thomas noted, if Congress had wanted to give HHS the power to impose a vaccine mandate, “it would have done what it has done elsewhere — specifically authorize one.”
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
- 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yGood. Regardless of my feelings on if people should or shouldn't be getting vaccinated, it's unconstitutional to mandate an individual undergo a medical procedure as a prerequisite to access to the guaranteed rights of all American citizens.
50 Reply - 578 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt left the door open for more targeted approaches to vaccine mandates. I won't be surprised when a whole long list of new targeted mandates come out. Employees who are exposed to the general public regularly, employees who are in regular contact with 10 or more co-workers for more than an hour a day, employers providing goods or services necessary to the national defence, employers who contract with the federal government? Probably going to see mandates soon. And they'll probably stick.
00 Reply
+1 yAs pro-vaccination as I am, I disagree with a mandate that will force everyone to be vaccinated.
60 Reply
+1 yGood. This joke has gone on long enough.
It wasn't funny when it started and it's still not funny now.
20 Reply12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It was a largely meaningless case as the the mandate still is in place for health workers and those who took federal funding... which is pretty much all businesses.
All that happens now is that the government can't be overt in taking action against those who do not comply.
But Americans are all about underhanded tactics anyway.00 ReplyI'm happy about the decision they made. It is a personal choice. The government has no right what to tell i should put in my body.
60 Reply
+1 yMoat people think its a good idea to mandate but everyone forget that we are a nation of choice not a nation of force amongst there people. more you force us to do something more we are going to fight. I find it very odd that certain polictians are buying stock in the vaccine companies and in the the last quarter one of the companies made 37billion dollars thats in 3months and they want to mandate it. come on people wake up its not about making people safer its about money and that is it.
20 Reply- 639 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYou live in a slave gulag society filled with super entitled adult toddlers. You see it on these pages every day. Day in day out. Butthurt little boys and girls whining and crying over any inconvenience. Go out, go make money and die for your job. They don't give two fks about you. If you die, they write off your stupid arse from their taxes and replace you within 48 hours. Enjoy the flea dumb that 40 years of ultra right wing republicans packing the court has gotten you.
00 Reply - 3.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u +1 yIt is a very good thing that the mandates were struck down.
50 Reply
+1 yIt's the right call but for the wrong reason. They didn't go far enough because they left open the possibility of congress allowing this. This should be ruled unconstitutional.
30 Reply303 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It doesn't matter any more covid is too strong and the only ones with balls to do what need to stop it is China. A full global quarantine for 6 weeks. No one leaves their houses. Those that are enforcing it, people deliver food and medicine and medical care work would be allowed out with regular testing.
00 ReplyA victory for those against authoritarianism and institutional discriminatory malpractice. One could also claim the Dems' attempt was racist, because it would disproportionately impact minority workers too.
10 Reply
+1 yIt's a bad call, I think. Going to cost a lot of lives unnecessarily. A lot of lasting damage. Allowing a selfish few moronic science deniers to completely screw over everyone else. No logic behind it. Just pure lunacy.
10 Reply6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Finally some support for the Constitution and human rights.
41 Reply- +1 y
Amen!
1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think the supreme court is right on this one. The gov has no business telling me what I need to put in my body. If I want it to live in country ran by dictators, I would move too China.
40 ReplyI agree 100%. The vaccine and masks should not be mandated.
50 Reply- 411 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt was definitely the right move. Had the Supreme Court allowed this, they would have set up a precedent where OSHA could bully businesses through mandates.
30 Reply - 5.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yi think it's funny how everyone thought trump was trying to fuck the country. when he did more for america than most other presidents before him.
biden is just the representative of the capitalist oligarchy.22 Reply- +1 y
Trump, like most presidents in recent decades, is also a representative of the capitalist oligarchy.
- +1 y
@WalterBlack the only president before him who dared to challenge the establishment so openly was shot in the head...
500 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Question is kind of misleading as it was aimed at businesses with 100+ workers.
It was either vaccine or weekly tests.
Unless this isn't the one you were referring to.10 Reply- 6.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt was the correct ruling. The federal government overstepped its authority.
30 Reply
+1 yI think of it as a good thing. As well as dropping the mask mandate for businesses too. We are not a fascist country. So Biden's fascist laws will not prosper here in this country.
10 Reply- 3.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHe found out that he didn’t have the power to oppress people, so he had to beg the states to implement the mandates anyway. What someone who respected liberty would do is ask the people directly and accept those who refuse.
00 Reply id say good but im not to opinionated on it. while i do think people should get the vaccine i dont think it should be forced by the government if anything it just makes the antivaxers more hesitant to get it
00 Reply
+1 yHopefully this applies to companies that are forcing you to get them or be fired
50 Reply- 4.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWhomever is running this circus FAR overstepped their boundaries of Constitutionality. It just got steered back into at least a tiny bit of sanity.
30 Reply
+1 yI conferred with boyfriend about this question. He tells me it is a matter of the 10th Amendment vs interstate commerce.
21 Reply635 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. They should have also upheld an injunction on the healthcare mandate. Federal funds don't take away people's rights.
10 Reply
+1 yRn it’s just a preliminary injunction. They haven’t heard the case on the merits yet, nor has the full court voted.
12 Reply- +1 y
The full court has voted.
The decisions were 6-3 and 5-4 - +1 y
@BillyBalls fascinating. Thank you. I don’t believe in vaccine mandates (though I am vaccinated myself), so I can’t say I’m sad.
- 2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI agree with both decisions. I'm vaccinated and pro-vaccinations, but against the mandates. However, working in the medical community is different, which is why I agreed with the second decision.
10 Reply 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Not suprised , but its a VERY foolish decision , although they judge on law , not the topic. Should have done same with lockdowns.
04 Reply- +1 y
I will buy you a first class ticket to North Korea! You’ll won’t see people making their own personal choices. And you’d love living there.
- +1 y
You’re media brainwashed in a free world. And want the gov with all the powers and guns to tell people what they should have in their bodies. Don’t ruin the last free place in the world!! Just move to a nation that is already setup with your type of people.
- 9.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySupport it. We can't be letting a virus that has nearly a 100% survival rate control our lives nor live our lives in fear with a virus that's basically a cold or mild fever.
30 Reply It opens the path to remove most of government/secret societies. It's a big win, and has been planned for years. Checkmate.
02 Reply
The Supreme Court has "Bejing"Biden
Now they need to toss him jail
For refusing to put MPP back in place
When Biden was ordered to do so10 Reply2.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think people should get vaccinated. I also think it is their right not to and the government can’t force them. I am vaccinated and have had the booster.
00 Reply
+1 yThis whole thing is one big SHAM
We should've already had a worldwide revolution by now, but rettarrds are still buying the BULLSH*T10 Reply
+1 yIt is horseshit they kept the mandate for healthcare workers.
31 Reply27.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. They support the 4th amendment of the Constitution. People will be secure in their bodies.
10 Reply
+1 yits bull shit, you getting sick at work is a danger to my life. either test or vaccine. im not into the honor system of being vaccinated
11 Reply751 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. you already can't get a covid test. How does anyone with half a brain think we are going to produce another 100 million Covid tests a week to test half the country weekly. this is beyond stupid
00 ReplyI think it is good for people who dont want to be forced to be vaccinated
30 Reply- 704 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think mandates are a sign we the people aren't in charge.
05 Reply- +1 y
@goaded That not a mandate, thats a law, legally speaking they are different. Secondly I think we should vote on bills, not people, and thirdly, the side of the road you drive on depends on your country, but going against whatever side that is is also violating common sense, since it results in car crashes and whatnot. Then again, some would argue we shouldn't have cars, but thats a topic for another day.
- +1 y
- +1 y
- 2.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ythe SCOTUS did the right thing. but it ultimately doesn't matter as biden probably knew it would fail. he just wanted to look good to his base
10 Reply
+1 yWe still have a bit of freedom. Granted this whole debacle could have been perpetrated years ago with swine flu and level one SARS..
10 Reply- Show More (33)
What is your stand on the vaccine mandate?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News