Guys, Do you think it’s okay that people are gathering to protest outside of Supreme Court justices houses?

[globetrotter22]

Regardless of your feelings about the Supreme Court looking to overturn Roe vs Wade i personally think it’s disgusting and wrong for mobs to show up outside the justice’s houses. Protest all you want in front of the Supreme Court building but not at their houses where their kids sleep.

What’s even worse is that NONE of the elected Democrat politicians are condemning this and of course the mass media is cheering it on.

I just don’t remember conservatives protesting outside justices houses when obergefell vs Hodges (gay marriage bill) passed in 2015.

No this dangerous and wrong. Protest at the Supreme Court building but respect someone’s house and residence

This is fine and necessary.

[RolandCuthbert]

How is it okay to storm a government building, beat down the officers, breach the premises, destroy property, shit in the hallways, and try to overturn an election?

But it isn't okay to peaceful protest outside a judge's home.

Get that nonsense out of here. It is a guaranteed right to peacefully protest. And if they are not on the judge's property, there is no violation.

And funny thing is, it is the most futile action they can take. Those folks had better figure out how to mobilize.

[globetrotter22]

Ñame one elected just one elected republican who said January 6th was okay. January 6th was an very ugly but isolated event. January 6th which was over in 3 hours and all the perpetrators were (rightfully) fully prosecuted. Also how ironic you make that “beat down officers” comment. So now you support law enforcement huh?

But then again all the BLM riots in 2020 were just “civil unrest” right? We just forget about the billions of dollars of damage, destroyed businesses, over 30 people being killed, etc. If you riot for the right reason then it’s “okay” right?

[RolandCuthbert]

What the fuck?

1. Ted Cruz your boy, claims the supreme court protests were worse than January 6th. Protests where no one died. Where no one was even injured. Where no window was broken. No one even jaywalked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWByZwtbqdE

2. I don't know how you guys think other than to simply classify you are lying disgusting creatures who will say anything, at anytime, because you think it gives you an edge. I ask law enforcement for one thing and that is to follow the fucking law. Do not kill innocent people. For you, that is somehow, not supporting law enforcement. Because I would have the nerve to believe I have rights and freedoms.

3. BLM was no where near this conversation, but you found a way to bring them in. Somehow a freakshow trumpturd who is beating an officer nearly to death is not responsible for his own fucking actions. But a BLM protester is responsible for every single window broken, fire set, rock thrown, or bad word uttered by a person who wanted to riot.

That's how fucked up your mind is.

[globetrotter22]

Ted Cruz initially called January 6th a “terrorist attack” he later backtracked because he didn’t like peaceful protestors being slandered. But he sure as hell didn’t support what happened and nor did anyone else.

amp.cnn.com/.../index.html

Now you got Jen Psaki saying it’s okay to protests outside of justices HOMES. Again these are there HOMES where their family lives.

nypost.com/.../

But yes I will fucking bring BLM riots into this since you felt like it okay to bring January 6th into this. So many leftists think everybody is going to conveniently forget about the mass looting and rioting that happened in 2020 thanks to BLM by bringing up January 6th. That’s like comparing a mosquito to a 800lb gorilla when it comes to aggregate damage and loss of life.

[Agagagagaga]

@RolandCuthbert Ted Cruz is not “our boy” moron.

[RolandCuthbert]

So you are just going to lie. Cruz said a peaceful protest was more threatening than January 6th. And you are going to lie and say that is not support.

Everyone should support peaceful protest, even if you don't fucking agree with the protesters.

This is the United States.

Yes, are you fucking blind? I typed this already. It is okay to protest on public property. You cannot protest on private fucking property. Did you ever learn the difference in kindergarten? Public property belongs to the public. It is for public use. Private property is privately held.

Yes, I bring January 6th into this because you are threatened by peaceful protests. You are threatened by someone lighting a fucking candle. You are threatened because people have the right to disagree with your political views. But when people bring weapons, bring a fucking bomb, and beat the shit out of officers, we are supposed to welcome them. You are a totalitarian scared batshit insane freak.

I wouldn't be caught dead with a insano like you. But I would never say you could not peacefully protest whatever issue you saw fit. And I would not be threatened by you disagreeing with me.

[RolandCuthbert]

@Agagagagaga Oh he is.

And trump is ya daddy.

What the fuck trumpturd nonsense is this? You batshit insane freaks call folks who disagree with you over one singular policy libtards, commies, and pinkos.

We tell ya the truth about your brood and you whine.

Get that nonsense out of here.

[Anonymous]

not even a little bit. Hilarious that they're doing it at Pelosi's house now though. Couldn't happen to a more deserving reptile.

But yeah, kudos to the moron in the comments who tried to compare protesting at the HOMES of Supreme Court Judges to protesting at the BUSINESS of clinics.

I remember when these leftist dumbasses thought it was ok to "protest" ICE offices by throwing molotov cocktails and fire bombs at them with people inside.

The Left continues to justify their acts of violence. Nothing new.

[OlderAndWiser]

Anyone who tries to influence another person's behavior by violence and threats is a bully. If pro-abortion people have the moral high ground, why do they need to stoop lower than a snake's belly?

[Dargil]

They are violating Federal law and should be arrested and prosecuted.

[exitseven]

As long as the Jan 6th protesters are released from whatever black hole they have been languishing in for the last 17 months. Or else they need to join them.

[SlangSlayer]

Yeah it's fine. It means nothing. They still gonna ban abortion or leave up the states.

It's there right to do so.

It's mostly losers with no jobs. On welfare or living of mommy or daddy

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Technically is legal if they are in a public area, but I don't think is wise to protest in front of people's house especially in a crowd of angry people. Things can get ugly very quick doing so.

[IsoUser]

I never make it a point to discuss Religion or Politics on any side because their Are Equal DOUCHEBAGS in CONGRESS AND SENATE

[OddBeMe]

Just like anti-abortionists protesting outside clinics? Sometimes violently?

[globetrotter22]

It’d legal to protest in front of a business or public building. But protesting in front of a private residence with the intention if intimidating a judge into changing their mind is a completely different story.

[OddBeMe]

All protests are to influence. Intimidate means terror is involved…semantics.

But first amendment clearly protects protests. And as long as they’re not trespassing or threatening, nothing we can do.

[globetrotter22]

No your wrong. It is NOT legal to gather in a crowd and protest outside a private residence. It is also not legal to intimate a justice.

Here’s a article from the Washington Post about this (not Fox News). www.washingtonpost.com/.../

[OddBeMe]

Huh, seems like an oddly written rule for judges. Like the DOJ clause not indicting a president. But fair enough.

We’ll see if the cops have the balls to arrest them.

[globetrotter22]

@OddBeMe cops have been quite limited on what they can do over the past few years. These are the kind of people who scream about police brutality too despite breaking the law. Judge Alito is in hiding right now because of threats on his life. Has this ever happened to a supreme court justice before?

Anyway I’m not against legal and peaceful protesting no matter if I agree or not with the cause.

But honestly I’m more pissed off at the Biden administration and morons like Jen Psaki who won’t call this be out. If conservative activists were illegally going to justices homes to intimidate them during the 2015 gay marriage bill I wouldn’t stand for it.

[globetrotter22]

Also this rule was written to prevent justices and jurors from being threatened snd coerced by the kind of activists you see right now.

Imagine if the jurors on OJ Simpson trial weren’t sequestered and far right activists went to their houses to intimidate them into voting him guilty of murder. These rules exist to protect the justice system. That doesn’t mean you may agree with the justice system is doing. But if they didn’t exist we would live in mob rule.

[OddBeMe]

You mean simple regulations can be made for constitutional amendments?

[NorthwestRider]

Protesting is legal, this is not North Korea or Russia

[Agagagagaga]

You know goddamn well it’s meant to intimidate people inside their homes.

Cut the bullshit.

[NorthwestRider]

@Agagagagaga I know it is your wet dream to banned free speech and you are a sick person

[msc545]

Yes, as long as there is no violence or destruction of property.

[Anonymous]

I may not agree with what or where you are protesting, but I defend your right to do it.

[CloudMassacre]

I think if they’re just protesting it’s fine

[globetrotter22]

But this is outside people’s houses where their spouses and kids live. It’s meant to intimidate them. That’s wrong.