I read his book The Great Chessboard. It's a very interesting book that explains what the USA must do to keep its world domination, what are the major geopolitical players and what are the developments in the world.
However I found some confusing in this book as its way of expressing itself. he almost considers that the USA has a messianic mission, that ultimately American domination serves the interests of humanity. Thus, in this implacable logic, to challenge America would be to act against "the fundamental interests of humanity".
he also says that the USA also have vassals (in particular the European countries), that there are “Barbarian” countries.
I found this language somewhat surprising from a man who has played such a big role in American politics.
Was Zbigniew Brzeziński a good national security adviser?
Nope. He was a war criminal, and all round shit eating bastard.
From orchestrating the Shahs revolutions in Iran, to the arming of counter revolution in South America, right up to the proxy war in Afghanistan.
There will be a special place in hell for that monster, and his imperialist agenda is part of what made the US the criminal state with the angel mask, it is today.
I developed an opinion of him years ago. I can't remember the details now but my vague memory is that he caused more trouble and got us involved in things we shouldn't have. I'd have to study him again. I put him in the same box as George Soros
Superb Opinion