How do you feel about this phenomena of "blackpill, bluepill world"?

[Northernlights25]

I stumbled across a channel on youtube that discussed this thing about "blackpill" wherein men are essentially told to just give up if they do not meet a very specific physical standard, apparently this is an entire science where they break down the rules of being either "sub5, normie" or a "chad" in looks. I'm curious as to how many actually buy into this.

I have to say it does seem like this lot are wallowing in self-pity, and that attitude is going to be a self-fulfilling prophecy when interacting with women. You won't meet someone if you're already set on the idea that you're never going to. It's of course true that superficiality exists to a point but it all feels a bit, exaggerated from this perspective. Blown out of proportion. Or at the very least they're focusing on extremely shallow girls, of which not every female is. I mean even the questions they normally pose are negatively loaded as "worst way to approach" as if a pessimistic starting point is given, why not "best approach"? Women are going to pick up on the vibe you put off, and if it's this defeatist, bitter and negative one, it's over before you start. I gotta be honest making an entire science out of sexual treatment based on a made up tier feels a tad lame to me. You could spend your time improving yourself and thus your chances instead of stacking up reasons on why the world is hopelessly segregated all day. Not every man can look the best, but every man can look his best.

[ShadezMcgee]

@Agape93 gave a succinct reply on how this is already. Black Pill is just a topic revolving around the dating community and online forums that delve into topics such as pills (red, blue, black, purple, etc.), Chads/Staceys, Alpha/Beta/Sigma/Omega/Gamma, it is a rabbit hole of ideology that can bring up some good points, but is ultimately a toxic cesspool that goes into the root of masculinity in the online realm known as the manosphere.

The Black Pill in particular is affiliated with a group known as the incels that also use the Chad and Stacey terms to describe the top tier men and women. Incels are very pessimistic individuals that put a high level of focus on their looks instead of focusing on developing themselves on a personal level that would make them more attractive as a whole. They suffer from low self esteem, mental issues and poor personality. A lot of incels don't look bad on a physical level and would probably have more success if they did take care of themselves better physically by staying hygienic, staying fit and developing themselves on a professional level and building relationships without expectations of outcomes. Limiting belief is what keeps them petrified.

These things although they hold some truth are moreso just a meme or shitpost at the end of the day with how mainstream and ridiculous it has come. Nothing good comes from restricting your worth as a man to a simple term or word from an online forum.

[Northernlights25]

Thank you for your extensive account. I believe I get the gist of it now.

[OddBeMe]

Funny how the VO sounds like he knows what he's talking about. But really he's fully of shit.

[Agape93]

It's a bunch of manosphere nonsense, like that stupid alpha/beta/Sigma shit

[Northernlights25]

What in the world is a manosphere?

[Agape93]

It's a series of toxic dude bro concepts, usually based in bitterness and/or sexism.

[Northernlights25]

Sad to hear such things exists. Maybe the dating market has some kind of problem if that is prevalent but I don't think it's, whatever this blackpill thing is.

[Agape93]

Agreed. Blackpill is basically the idea that most guys are too ugly and dating preferences are too strict. It's nonsense.

[Lord_Saddler]

More Western food for lunacy.