Did juror in Heard/Depp trial just admit to misogyny?

[OddBeMe]

Again, I’m only for precise evidence. And that tells me both Heard and Depp are horrible people. But a juror just went on GMA and said:

• ”“The crying, the facial expressions that she had, the staring at the jury—all of us were very uncomfortable,” the juror, who was one of five male jurors on the seven-member panel, told GMA. “She would answer one question and she would be crying and then two seconds later she would turn ice cold… Some of us used the expression ‘crocodile tears.’”

What happened to just looking at the evidence?

Yes

No

Dont know

[msc545]

There was no misogyny. The demeanor and nonverbal communication of a witness, including Amber Heard, goes directly to credibility which in fact IS legitimate evidence in a trial. The jurors thought she was not credible, a view shared by most people who saw that part of the trial.

[OddBeMe]

Eye witnesses are technially legit evidence. But bad evidence. So is body behavior by unqualified aholes

[msc545]

I'm not sure what "So is body behavior by unqualified aholes" means. Can you explain this please?

[IsoUser]

I'll catch that Monday while reading front Cover Of " National Inquirer " at grocery store while standing in line in between headlining of " Bigfoot Spotted " and Arkansas woman has alien twins. LMFAO 😉😁😁😁😁😁

[WhitneySnow]

I know a lawyer and they told me that it’s the jury’s job to evaluate the credibility of the witness, including body language and whether tears are real or fake

[Redhead999]

No. The juror basically just stated the truth. She was lying, the looked at the evidence ie her testifying

[Snakeyes7]

There was nothing misogynistic about what the juror said, unless you want to argue that crocodile tears are uniquely female behavior then I think you are the misogynist here.

[OddBeMe]

I guess its more their expectations.

[Snakeyes7]

I agree that behavior alone isn't proof of wrongdoing but it certainly doesn't look good for a defendant of an accusation of defaming someone. For all I know, the juror being interviewed was pointing out something he or she noticed and not anything proving her guilt.

[OddBeMe]

Who onows. Jurors do have carte blanche power to decide anyway they want.

[Anonymous]

How exactly is not finding someone's testimony credible equal to misogyny?

What a joke!

[Opinion Owner]

The more of your questions I read, the more I'm convinced you are a woman pretending to be a man.

[OddBeMe]

Should i call you a bitch and upload dick pics?

[Opinion Owner]

I couldn't care less what you call me, but at least call yourself what you are... a female.

[OddBeMe]

I can't. I dont beleive in catfishing. Thats my actual pic.

[Anonymous]

So, you feminists now claim that a woman's testimony not being believable is misogyny?

You feminist women are a joke.