Was Johnny Depp's verdict at the trial a win for misogyny?

[crazycagurlz]

Yes

No

Undecided

[ShesRad80]

no, she was is absolute nightmare and confirmed liar, she smeared that guy as much as she could with lies. people saw through he BS and gave the right verdict. she clearly was the abuser. if anything it shed light on domestic violence against men and proves why they dont come forward because most won't believe them

[Pyrofox]

Its a win for just being a man. So many men get destroyed in courts by fake allegations its honestly disgusting. Its like no wonder large portions of males in society are choosing to go monk or cave man over participating in society. Hell we are at a point where men are asking for consent videos when it comes to romantic coupling. The time to be attacking men for just wanting a female partner in my opinion is long gone and if women keep on chasing the idea of men being the issue. Men could just very well choose to either destroy society so it can be built back up like Rome. Or just choose to watch human society wilt and eventually rot when there's not enough new births to sustain humanity's existance. Cause contrary to belief most sperm dono locations don't have the diversity long term to sustain society.

[ManOnFire]

Not even close. If she had won, would it have been a win for 'misandry'? We need even more cases like this to be won for men. And if it would happen more, women would start learning that they can't just get away with shitty behavior towards men just because they're women.

[thatshydork]

It wasn’t a win for misogyny, it was a win for all victims of abuse. For people to see that the abusers can actually get held accountable is a very powerful thing, especially for those who have been convinced that no one would believe them if they ever reported it.

[madhatters4]

i don't know. i tend to think both are problem problematic mercurial people. add in a lot of substance abuse and you have a explosive situation.

but i don't pretend to really know these two or what went on in their relationship to know

[Anonymous]

Did people switch off their ears when it came to the overwhelming amount of evidence proving she had abused Johnny? As for her winning in the UK, maybe do some research because apparently the judge was friends with someone who knew Amber. So Johnny stood no chance being able to prove she was the abuser. Also maybe also do some research because there was also evidence he was not allowed to submit in the UK

[Sasha0426]

That bitch admitted she abused him in court and tried to lie her way out of it. She lost! End of story.

[crazycagurlz]

She didn't lose in UK courts. Depp switched to US courts because they're ruled by Republicans.

[Sasha0426]

Oh, I see. Because he’s a man you think he’s the enemy.

[Sasha0426]

Sorry, but I’m not going to side with you.

[ManOnFire]

@crazycagurlz The UK is always softer on women because they have a whole Queen Mum mindset and think women need nurturing even more than people in the U. S. think so.

[provokeesmokee]

With the sheer amount of evidence of Heard's abuse? No way. It's a win for male victims of domestic abuse. Well, really for any victim of domestic abuse - case precedent doesn't depend on gender.

[worldscolide]

It was a strike again the narrative that women never lie. That women never abuse. That women are always the victim. Amber was, and still is, an evil lying bitch, and a worthless piece of shit. Johnny had video and audio evidence of all of it. I cannot believe some people are delusional enough to be on her side still.

[NamerOfStars]

Requiring basic evidentiary standards be adhered to is misogyny?

That would require it being the case that women actually ARE inferior to men.

[jshm2]

She fucking shit the marital bed!

How the fuck can you consider even staying with a person like that?

[crazycagurlz]

That was wrong of her, but victims can make bad decisions because of the traumas thrusted upon them.

[Sasha0426]

@crazycagurlz You’re that type of cunt who would falsely accuse any guy of rape and abuse.

[jshm2]

You're confused. She was not any sort of victim to begin with. It's why she lost, and the appeal was not upheld. You are barking up the wrong tree.

[John_Doesnt]

No, it was a win for male victims of domestic abuse. Johnny was completely innocent of any wrong doing and Amber was a lying bed pooper.

Every female victim of abuse should be angry as hell at Amber for being a liar and making it harder to believe actual female victims.

[4ngelic]

no she's not a little saint and she's the main abusive person if i understood everything right

[WhitneySnow]

No. Amber Heard was a narcissist who does not represent most women.

[Count_de_Monte_Volo]

It’s very simple. She tried to ruin his reputation. He sued for damages (because the defamation was designed to deny him career opportunities that provide income). That has nothing to do with misogyny.

[Anonymous]

I think that trial confirmed whatever people previously believed.

If you wanted to se it as a win for misogyny then that's what you saw. If you wanted to see it as a controlling b**** that ultimately did not get her way then that's what you saw.

[DextroShade]

It wasn't a win for misogyny it was a win for truth and a loss for misandry. Amber Heard was proven to be not only a liar but a deranged abuser. Anyone who still supports her is either ignorant to the facts of the case or simply hates men.

[DrKrieger]

A win for misogyny? Wasn't Amber the aggressor in their relationship?

[Anonymous]

Lol, why are some women mad about this? Most men aren't Johnny Depp. Women will still be able to falsely accuse a man and will
blindly be believed by most. Don't worry about it.

[Sasha0426]

You heard Disney fired him, right? Because of this Amber Heard shit he lost his role in Pirates of the Caribbean and his role in Fantastic Beasts. But, I think he got his job back.

[Opinion Owner]

I know. But a minority of women are mad because they think this will prove to people that some women lie and can even be abusers themselves. Those women are scared they won't be able to get away with this bs anymore.

But this trial isn't going to make people give a shit about men. People cared about Johnny Depp. That's all.

[electromagnetic]

Nope. She was a crazy beach and if the roles were reversed, y’all would have wanted the death penalty for him.

[Snakeyes7]

The only way you can possibly see this as misogyny is if you see misogyny as women not getting special treatment.

[Anonymous]

Amber has very serous and frankly dangerous problems like far too many women today have unfortunately as a result of a lack of accountability growing up.

[RavVid]

It was a verdict for truth and against just making shit up.

[LiamJHayden]

I am admittedly biased since Depp was buddies with one of my heroes, the late Jeff Beck, but from what I've seen the correct decision was reached.

[ryancg]

Only if you don't believe women are capable of abuse.

[msc545]

It was a win for the truth. Amber Heard is a monster.

[OddBeMe]

It seems they were horrible to each other. And Depp won because she hit his reputation even if he slapped her a few times like you should with a bitch.

[Anonymous]

Misogynists may try and use that trial as some sort of confirmation bias of their stupid beliefs but I watched the entire trial live and know for myself the truth

[inhua]

what is the truth then?

[Opinion Owner]

@inhua well the trial was a defamation case, but it definitely came to light that amber heard was indeed abusive in some form and lied/embellished several times although I will say in my personal opinion their entire relationship was dysfunctional and should’ve never had gone on for the length it did

[inhua]

so what does "misogyny" have to do with this if you're in agreement Amber Heard is guilty?

[Opinion Owner]

@inhua I literally said misogynists try to use the case to spread what ever narrative they are trying to spread?

[inhua]

and what sort of narrative is this being spread?

that men can also be victims of rape, murder, domestic abuse etc. at the hands of women?

that women can lie about being victims of rape, murder, domestic violence etc. and the man is always guilty of such alleged crimes?

that society sees men as oppressors and perpetrators while women are innocent and can do no wrong?

[Opinion Owner]

@inhua I didn’t say any of that lol? It is very much known that men can be victims- I’m waiting for the day that men themselves will acknowledge that, instead of bragging about losing their virginity to their babysitter at 14.
Everybody is capable of lying.
Of course men are not inherently oppressors. I’ve never seen anybody say that, but I won’t invalidate your own experience. Nobody on this earth labels all women as “innocent” beings that can “do no wrong.” That is extremely evident.
I’m unsure why you’ve come across here like this was an argument when we clearly agree.

[inhua]

men who don't acknowledge male victims and brag about losing their virginity to their babysitter are mostly male feminists who engage in hypocritical double standards to try and "stand out" amongst other so-called toxic men. you'll never get these male feminists to acknowledge this without lashing out emotionally with insults, slander and cancel culture

[Opinion Owner]

@inhua that’s interesting that you say that because the men who I’ve seen fail to acknowledge male victims are usually vehemently anti-feminist lol

[genericname85]

no it was a victory for abuse victims. cause abuse victims don't have a gender. everyone can be victim of abuse.

[Anonymous]

No, it's a win against all liars regardless of gender. Liars must be exposed.

[Anonymous]

No. It was a stunning and just win over a dreadful toxic woman and her lack lustre legal team in the back drop of me-too toxicity.

[Anonymous]

"you really are a special kind of dumb"

[007kingifrit]

wow the corporate old media really defended amber "poop in the bed" heard,

take NOTHING they say seriously

[Girlsontop]

Not at all

[LimitedBenefits101]

Oh look angry feminist spotted

[DarkWinterNights]

Username checks out.