What do you think of Hunter Biden's crack scale?

[Juxtapose]

I've seen a few of those at the local head shop xD

Updates

+1 y

The bit of Biden bragging about an anti-drug law he helped get past was so satisfying to watch!

[Fuentes]

Biden and the Clintons both wrote that Anti drug bill and not only that Hilary Clinton called little black kids "Super Predators" lol you the know the drug bill was just a clean up after the CIA and Reagans mess of getting caught up in the proxy wars where they used the poor black population to sale crack from South America & Central America and weapons just to fund abolishing Russian influence by destabilizing every country in Central and South America who decided to side with Russia or get into a relationship with them.

Once they won they made a drug bill to battle the crack epidemic, they created. But Biden & the Clinton's made sure they got paid for it by these bills and made themselves and the Prison Industrial system rich. Crime pays on both sides of the fence.

[JustiReno]

That’s what they get for trusting Russians … 5 years for smoking drugs tho? That’s so harsh!!! Didn’t rob nobody wtf

[Fuentes]

@JustiReno but leftist weirdos will lower the pedophile/sex offenders laws lol

[Fuentes]

Thanks

[BCA6010]

I'm not a digital scale aficionado, so take my opinion with a grain of salt (or crack), but it seems functional and accurate enough I guess. I'll wait for the CNET reviews first.

[JustiReno]

Naw dude is a confirmed smoker, confirmed.

[Juxtapose]

I have the same scale but I don't do hard drugs.

[Smoke-n-Growls]

That's a regular fucking scale with kitchen sugar on it. You can buy everything you see there at the dollar store.

Fuck, Republicans are dumb.

[Guy__]

All authority believers are dumb slaves.

[JustiReno]

That’s a digital scale with crack on it you moron you think he smoke sugar? He be stressing pulling on that pipe too 😭

[Juxtapose]

Who the fuck weighs sugar on a scale? You use measuring cups for sugar.

[Guy__]

Lmao I didn't even think of it.
As sugar is not only void of nutrition but also one of the biggest targets for atrazine.
Which turns the fkin frogs gay.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842049/

If a male is constantly injected with estrogen since he was stored in the epididymis, will it affect his sexuality? ↗

[Guy__]

I never used sugar. Grew up knowing it's poison.

[VanessaValentine]

There are literal photos and videos of him snorting cocaine with strippers he literally calls it cocaine himself. You can clearly see he is fucked up. Why would you think that’s sugar.

[ninaneedshelp]

Seriously lock him up already

[JustiReno]

Nina you need help … and I have an idea 1. Go undercover in ghislaine maxwells circle like trump did 2. Video tape everything 3. Cash out thank me later

[UCrayCray]

@JustiReno
Trump went undercover in Maxwell’s circle? To do what?
I haven’t heard this version of Trump the Victim King.

[jamesgoldman]

I have a similar set for gold buying... given the Amazon recommended 'frequently bought together' was baggies and a fucking machete... definitely popular in drug circles

[NYCQuestions1976]

Two things come to mind:

1.) How were Hunter Biden's devices and cloud accounts hacked and compromised?

2.) Why did he seemingly record and save EVERYTHING he's done?

[joeldalton]

1) Rumor is it's the same password he uses for everything and never changed it.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@joeldalton Holy crap, that's hilarious.

[joeldalton]

It's a hell of a rabbit hole

mobile.twitter.com/search?q=%23HunterBideniPhone

[joeldalton]

And the peak of clown world

[joeldalton]

(psst, just a photoshop joke, move along)

[Exterminatore]

Don’t all Ukrainian oil company executives smoke crack?

[goaded]

I think you're distracting from this...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/x4B9FEEpY9Q

[WhiteBoyChill]

Literally nobody cares about the hearings. Besides liberals

[goaded]

@WhiteBoyChill And people who care about democracy. Which even includes Republicans. And (real) oath keepers. Oaths are sworn to uphold the constitution, not some demagogue. This stuff is important. Like WWII important.

[exitseven]

@goaded Yes, all members of congress swear an oath to uphold the Constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCYz61wLRTw

[WhiteBoyChill]

It’s like you fail to understand that America isn’t a direct Democracy, we’re a Republic

[Juxtapose]

So you say while literally distracting from my question because it's uncomfortable for you. I'm not invested in Trump dude, I don't care if he gets convicted. I just hate fake liberals.

[goaded]

I don't care about Hunter Biden, he's not president and he's obviously a fuck-up. I do care about Murdoch trying to destroy democracy for profit. Sky News Australia is their OANN.

[goaded]

12 hours ago, you told me: " innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The court of public opinion doesn't count, we Americans have our rights. " to justify ignoring Trump's obvious criminality. It's almost as if you're being inconsistent, and that IOKIYR.

[Juxtapose]

I'm not stopping you from turning this around on me and saying Hunter Biden is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law 🤷‍♂️ This is *my* question though and I was courteous enough when answering your question to not try to make it about Joe Biden that wasn't I? Why don't you return me the same courtesy?

[Juxtapose]

*then wasn't I

[goaded]

I wouldn't say you can't discuss people's criminality unless they've been convicted because it's a crap argument. But since you think it's a good one, why did you post this question?

[anylolone]

I'm ripping my head over someone using a naked scale to weight course material.
Had to be fucking hunter.

[BillyBalls]

With the amount of Coke Hunter puts up his nose, he needs one of those scales they use at truck weigh stations along the interstates.

[JustiReno]

He smokes it, which shoes he really hates his life

[cloud9vortex1234]

I can't really say anything positive about that, but does anybody actually know about the other son that turned out well?

[normalice]

nap time for you again, i see

[Juxtapose]

Oh you have nothing? Thought so.

[Juxtapose]

Unlike you I'm not trying to distract from anything.

[normalice]

Why would I bother "having something" for your propaganda video?

And of course you are. You're trying to distract from the fact that no one is stupid enough to vote republican based on merit.

[Juxtapose]

I have literally never voted democrat or republican once in my life, you don't fucking know me man. I only vote third party.

Now take your assumptions and shove 'em up your ass. You partisan hacks don't know shit about me.

[Juxtapose]

The person I have voted for the most is Ralph Nader.

[normalice]

Yeah, I voted for Nader, too. And the reason I did is because I bought in to the far right "both parties are the same" malinformation. There are no reasons to vote against the only chance we have to preserve democracy other than the reasons right wing misinfotainment provides people with.

[Juxtapose]

Obviously both parties are not the same because they are different right? But them both being corrupt and not representing us is absolutely correct.

Look at how the Democratic establishment treated Bernie Sanders and only started to respect him once he bent a knee towards Pelosi and Clinton.

[normalice]

You mean how far right trolls pretending to be far left trolls told you Bernie was treated. The thing that happened to Bernie was this: Fewer people turned out to vote for him than Hillary. The online masquerade of an abundance of support didn't result in the numbers apparent online turing out to vote for him in real life. If you have been led to believe his loss was for any other reason then you have been misled to believe it by people who, quite simply, want republicans to win and know that will never happen based on merit.

[Juxtapose]

So you don't think Bernie Sanders was being suppressed by the left wing establishment?

[normalice]

Why would I think that? What does that even mean? When you try to get specifics out of people it's always some vague assertion that Clinton talked to someone at CNN or whatever. If you believe that's the sort of thing that really cased hundreds of thousands of Bernie supporters to stay home instead of vote, I'd have to wonder why you reconcile support for Bernie being so fragile with the assertion that he definitely should have won because he had overwhelming support.

[Juxtapose]

No.

www.chicagotribune.com/.../...20160725-column.html

"The leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee apparently confirmed what they have said all along — that the political system was rigged against their candidate in favor of Hillary Clinton.

Top Democrats essentially dismissed Sanders as a viable candidate during the primaries, attempted to undermine him with voters and even took steps to derail his campaign, according to hacked emails that were recently made public by WikiLeaks."

[normalice]

Opinion piece. The word "apparently" should have tipped you off. But you didn't want it to.

In any case, in what specific ways is it being claimed they undermined his campaign? And how do you believe Sanders would have been immune to such tactics when running against trump when you believe he was extremely vulnerable to it against hillary? The simple fact is Sanders lost because fewer people turned out to vote for him. If you want to claim any voter discouragement took place, fine, I don't necissarily believe you, but you aren't explaining how Bernie would have been immune to the exact same voter discouragement efforts against trump.

[Juxtapose]

"Schultz said she would step down after the convention. She has been forced to step aside after a leak of internal DNC emails showed officials actively favouring Hillary Clinton during the presidential primary and plotting against Clinton’s rival, Bernie Sanders."

www.theguardian.com/.../debbie-wasserman-schultz-resigns-dnc-chair-emails-sanders

[Juxtapose]

They're not supposed to do that. Bernie didn't get a fair shot.

[normalice]

Alright, so what was the plot? How did they discourage people who wanted to vote for Bernie from doing so?

[Juxtapose]

It's explained here:

www.google.com/.../dnc-emails-wikileaks-hillary-bernie-sanders

[normalice]

Summarize it. I'm not interested in reading someone's screenplay.

[Juxtapose]

You're not gonna like it but okay!

19K emails, DNC plots against Bernie when they are supposed to be in partial, reinforces establishment candidates, eliminates populous candidates and so on.

[Juxtapose]

If that isn't good for you then the link is right there.

[normalice]

So, how, exactly, did they stop people from voting for Bernie? You said a lot about how it they wanted to, but I want to know how they actually did it. How did they get the millions who wanted to vote for Bernie to stay home instead? And, follow up, if they hadn't done that, what do you imagine would have stopped trump from doing the exact same thing?

[Juxtapose]

You don't have to stop people from voting to stop someone from being voted for. You can suppress advertisements for them and suppress their exposure.

[Juxtapose]

Democrats at the moment are actually blocking the green party in some areas in ways they should not be.

[normalice]

Anyone in the green party is completely free to run as a Democrat. But no one is guaranteed votes just because they are right. The members of the green party should try running as a Republicans to see what were up against, though.

In any case, the idea that exposure was suppressed (which likely isn't even true) undercuts the theme that Bernie was popular on his own merits and, much more importantly, if you believe exposure can be so easily suppressed, what do you think would have stopped it from being suppressed when Trump was his opponent? The primaries are, above all, about electability. All the obstacles one must face to rise in the democratic party are nothing next to the firehouse of malinformation that is unleashed in the main election.

[Juxtapose]

Bernie Sanders would have absolutely demolished Donald Trump.

[Juxtapose]

There's almost 20,000 emails, the establishment was against Bernie from the start.

[normalice]

So, you don't have any tangible thing they actually did to suppress turnout for Bernie is what Im hearing. It sucks, I know, I voted for him twice, but the simple fact is he was outvoted. In Iowa we have caucuses for president. The Bernie crowd was packed. But so was the Hillary crowd. And I live in a deep blue voting district withing a deep blue county. The rest of the state is far more red, and they voted too.

[Juxtapose]

If 19,000 emails aren't good enough then I don't know what to tell you man.

[Juxtapose]

Did you know this is how Bernie Sanders got screwed by the DNC? ↗

[normalice]

I have more than 19000 emails in my inbox. They also affect reality in absolutely no way.

[Juxtapose]

Okay, so I guess you can just as easily discount the evidence presented at the Nuremberg trials as just paper that you can collect yourself right?

[normalice]

What matters it what happened in real life as a result of those emails. If you want to tell me a particular newscaster was slightly more hostile as a result, okay, that's maybe not measurable but at least it's tangible. Just saying there are 19000 emails doesn't say anything at all.

[Juxtapose]

Check out my latest question to see more.

[normalice]

No. Just tell me.

[Juxtapose]

You can go ahead and look at it yourself, nobody would have explained things to me as much as I have explained things to you.

There are two videos, a link and also a quote in the update from the link that should give you the information you need. I'm not going to waste my time copying and pasting a bunch of stuff over and over when you could just read it.

[normalice]

But you haven't explained anything and I told you I'm not going to click on your misinformation videos. A single sentence describing a way in real life you are convinced votes were taken from Bernie is all I have asked for, and instead you've tried very hard to recreate the illusion that something "could have happened." This is a right wing tactic. Trump did it, too, with Hillary's emails. No actual accusation, just a sort of "look at how many emails there are!" And that was enough to sway a couple thousand voters in a few swing states to stay home as, due to the relentless misinformation of trump allies, Hillary and Trump were starting to sound equally corrupt.

[888theGreat]

GAG took my question down on this

[Juxtapose]

The far leftists know they're losing the culture war and are resorting to further censorship.

[Guardian45]

H. K.!