It is essential to ban them to protect the rights of babies.
Protesting shouldn't be banned. Abortion protestors aren't violently breaking into The Capitol or turning violent so I don't see why their right to protest in public spaces should be infringed.
Most Helpful Opinions
No, the right to protest is guaranteed by the Constitution. To ban abortion protests would create a dangerous precedent. What' would be next? Banning Civil Rights protests? Labor strikes?
I agree. we need to keep baby murderers on a tight leash and put them in prison for a long, long time.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
11Opinion
If you don't protect the speech of your enemies, you pave the way for your own speech to be silenced.
No, not as long as they aren't violent, or clearly disruptive of the peace (for example, if protesters were to block a road). That's free speech.
Even if you don’t like abortion, asking for a law to ban pro abortion protest would pave the way for other speech to be banned.
protests r essential and fuck a permit, protests are supposed to be distruptive
No that would be in clear violation of the constitution
Nope thats unconstitutional
Of course not. Always remember Martin Niemoller.
Just protesting in the streets without a permit.
Protests shouldn’t be banned
That would violate the first amendment.
lol, no. weak trolling effort.
Free speech is an imperative.
Free speech?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions