Should one have the "right" NOT TO approve homosexuality WITHOUT being labeled?

[SpaceGalaxy]

Labeled = Meaning people generally describe them that way and you think that this is unfair.

[SnowedIn]

Yes. No one should be labeled. But that's where the problem is. Labels are thrown at those who don't approve of homosexuality (or, frankly, "it" -- whatever it is). That's not, as you put it, fair. At the same time, many (not all) who disapprove of homosexuality will use labels and that includes "immoral", "sinful", "wrong", etc. That may be what they believe and I respect that greatly, but the problem is that just because the label "sinful", for example, isn't "bigot" or something else, doesn't make it not a label. Anyway, my point is that we're all using labels.

But, the answer to your question is yes. No one should be labeled for their beliefs.

[SnowedIn]

Thank you for MHO!

[Sixgunsound]

You have the right to think what you want.

[Sixgunsound]

Thanks for MHO

[Kori1236]

You can disagree with it, but keep it to yourself. People don’t need to know you don’t support it. They don’t care. But if you’re one of those that feels the need to spout about how they disagree with it and make it known then people are free to react and label you as they see fit

[SpaceGalaxy]

What if i agree with it... should i also keep that to myself?

[Kori1236]

I mean you can. Many people do. It’s not something that needs to be announced to the world.

[SpaceGalaxy]

Got it. I did not mean announcing it to the world (as you have put it). I meant if that person who does not approve of homosexuality is asked about his opinion on it, he should be able to express his feeling without being labeled.

[Kori1236]

I mean that person can express that they don’t agree with it. But you can’t change peoples opinion of you after they’ve learned that information. Just like if there’s a group of people who don’t approve and then learn that someone does. They still have an opinion of that person

[Emiliamazing]

Individuals should strive to not let their own beliefs create negativity towards others who have differing views on subjects. Learning and understanding is the way to a more pleasant and peaceful world.

[OlderAndWiser]

No, you're missing the point. You are free to express your opinions about homosexuals but other people are free to express their opinions about you. Of course you don't like their opinions and the labels they spew like social justice swords, but homosexuals don't like your disapproval of them. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you will not suffer consequences for the words you say. Remeber the Dixie Chicks?

Either everyone has free speech or we don't have free speech.

[God_of_Thunder]

I think anyone should have the right to disapprove of anything they want.

The manner in which they express their disapproval, though, should also not disrespect the person/people they disapprove of, however.

A person can absolutely be against homosexuality/religion/politics/etc, and there's nothing wrong with that. That doesn't give them the right to harass/insult a person over those beliefs.

[Chazmatazz269]

This would be a “natural right” or some might say “God given”. The answer is unequivocally ‘yes’. This is at the very heart of liberty. We should all be able to do, say and think whatever we want as long as we’re not hurting anyone or taking something away from someone.

[NamerOfStars]

Um, that's asking for the right describe a group of people (homosexuals) and not in turn be described yourself. No, you should not have that; THAT would be unfair.

[misogynistic_pig]

I am homophobic and I have no problem admitting that I am.

[Cubus]

Of course.

The same you can be against heterosexual sex. You can approve being a virgin or having a white marirage. There's nothing wrong about it.

[AngryCarl]

What do you mean by "not approve"? Can you be more specific? If you disapprove quietly you won't be labelled.

[SmokinAces2000]

I’m pretty sure gay people just don’t like people that go out of their way to “advocate” against their whole existence

[Agagagagaga]

And I don’t like to see queers advocating for degeneracy and sodomy.

🤷‍♂️

[SmokinAces2000]

Hmm I’m assuming the only reason you believe that it’s degeneracy is because of a book written a thousand years ago, am I correct?

[LadiesFavoriteToy]

Yes. I fucking hate homosexuals and everyone who is a progressive leftists.

[SpringValley]

Yes, of course.

[Anonymous]

Bigots will be bigots.

[Fuentes]

Yes screw the commies

[Akam93]

Yes.

[NathanDavis]

love is love