For economic, criminal and educational reasons?
- 6.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBack in old days we needed a large workforce to work in factories or pick crops. But automation has largely taken those jobs. The reality is even if they study hard a great many of the poor simply don't get a look in when it comes to getting a decent job.
Drive through any deprived area and it's hard not to ask "what are these people for?" They produce nothing and those who work are usually just sustaining other poor peoples by working in local shops etc.
The problem is having kids brings in a child support allowance and guarantees a cheap council house. To some extent it's wiser to get pregnant than go to college. It's not hard to find poor people bitter they did everything their supposed to but are less well off than those who are perpetually pregnant and have never worked a day in their lives.
The problem with stopping their benefits is it's the innocent children who suffer, not their parents11 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yIsn’t it usually the rich who screw people over? 😏
32 Reply- +1 y
Yup. 😎
That policy isn't working out so well in the middle east. Unless you are going to sterilize the poor.
If poverty increases in America what will be created is a similar situation that led to the French and Russian revolutions.
24 Reply- +1 y
All that welfare on your taxes Is a drop in the ocean, I suspect most of it doesn't actually go to its intended purpose. Regardless investment needs to be made on us kids, we are way behind most countries on basic education and most of our kids that go to college aren't academically fit enough to go to college. It makes as much economic sense to invest in the future education of our kids as it does to invest in our infrastructure.
What I would say is that people who are not obese should pay less than obese people for health insurance as its the obese that's driving health insurance up.
3.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Are you a new genesis should black peoples not be allowed to procreate should jewis people not be allowed to procreate? Should the surfers be gelded and only the king be allowed to bread with the village women?
23 Reply- +1 y
Right that’s a eugenicist argument. If anything we should be encouraging fathers to raise there child regardless of economic status, We should be encouraging more children to be born and given a tax break to those who can bare children, once a women if above a certain age, we should actually encouraged man to go and have children with women of childbearing age. Second and third wife status especially since marriage is between a man and woman, with the idea of having children
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
11Opinion
27.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes, paying people on welfare more money for every illegitimate kid they have just make things worse. They should be penalized instead.
12 Reply- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yyou'll end up with more babies thrown in trash cans and discarded humans. It's like Jesus said, ya gotta write it on their hearts.
01 Reply 12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Where the fuck do you think soldiers, and labourers come from, dumbass?
01 Reply4.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No, that's creepy and the government should not be involved in people's lives like that. Wtf is wrong with you?
014 Reply- +1 y
Your response says a lot about you. I'm not saying that to be a dick, I'm saying that because I'm genuinely surprised you are okay with being watched.
Government surveillance is like somebody waving a blade in front of your face and then asking why are you nervous? But all it takes is a little bit of movement and your face will be cut. - +1 y
I don't want anybody looking at what I do in private for any reason. I think we have way too much surveillance in this society and that gives way too much power to government.
Just imagine how much worse it's going to get in the future when we can foreseeably read each other's thoughts..
- 1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHow do you propose to disincentivize them? Castration?
02 Reply- +1 y
You mean educate them that they can't have kids and give them tax breaks for planning not to have a family?
8.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That was why Planned Parenthood was founded, except it's to the black population.
08 Reply- +1 y
I guess they didn't really have much to say on interracial marriage nor Native Americans. They were definitely for the black vote because of the 13, 14 and 15th amendments. I do remember democrats being against all three or at the very least they were just as indifferent about Native Americans
+1 yIt is possible to be both poor and happy
12 Reply- 3.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ywhy must the poor reap all of the benefits?
00 Reply
+1 ySounds awfully liberal of you.
04 Reply- +1 y
You’re showing the democrat party’s true colors.
- +1 y
Idiot this is literally your opinion. I’ve never heard someone on the right advocate for this. Just like the right doesn’t want to kill black babies in the womb. Another eugenics thing you love.
+1 yNo. GREAT things come from small beginnings!
01 Reply11.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. No - regression to the mean is real.
02 Reply
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Do you agree or not ; poor people should not procreate?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News