Just a thought,
Demonstrable = fact.
Opinion, often = falsity (unless it is demonstrably true)
So why does anyone expected democracy based on petsonal opinion by people who cannot demonstrate any level of knowledge or expertise of the topic they talk about, can be considered democracy?
If it is mediocracy, opinions of average (median) people - call it mediocracy, not democracy.
Democracy must be empirically provable, so - scientific, rather than opinion based (that, in fact, makes us live in opinocracy)