Are people who follow orders blindly cowards?

[ChefPapiChulo]

Updates

+1 y

se·man·tics
/səˈman (t) iks/
noun
the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.

[Snakeyes7]

Yes. You need to have your own sense of morals and defend it with everything you have. Don't let others violate it.

[Wallythewalrus]

I wouldn't say that is true.

[ChefPapiChulo]

Please. You don’t even know what semantics is.

[Wallythewalrus]

I think you already proved you don't know what it means. I even asked if you wanted me to give you an example but you never replied back! I can give you one now or do a poll tomorrow? Which would you prefer?

[ChefPapiChulo]

Post your examples lol.

[ChefPapiChulo]

Hurry up.

[Wallythewalrus]

Semantics
"We've reached our final destination".
"We have reached our final stop"
They are worded differently but mean the same thing.
Not semantic: A leading question vs a loaded question! They have two totally different definitions! You have already admitted that!

[ChefPapiChulo]

Lol you don’t understand what semantics is.

Also loaded questions and leading questions are not completely different. Both are similar concepts. They can lead a person towards a certain answer or response.
For example

Mr walrus you have no idea what semantics is, do you?

Why doesn’t Mr Walrus have a clue of what semantics is?

First you will answer: yes I do know what it is cause hurr durrr.

Second you will answer: hurrr durrr, yes I do, hurrr durr.

[ChefPapiChulo]

That is why my European friend thought you were using a leading question. And you argued the semantics of it instead the core argument he was proposing.

That’s why I never engage in with you lol. Not worth the mental effort.

[Wallythewalrus]

A loaded question and a leading question have different definitions. If they don't, show me how they are SEMANTICALLY the same. I'll be waiting.

[Wallythewalrus]

It's funny how you say your European friend "thought", I was using a leading argument

[ChefPapiChulo]

Semantics doesn’t mean same definitions. It can also mean associative meaning.

Go learn what it actually means before you reply again. You waste my time.

[ChefPapiChulo]

Well you were leading the argument. You picked the time place and battlefield. The OP called you out on your BS but like my European friend said, stupidity entertains him.

[Wallythewalrus]

Do you even know what "-associative meaning" means? Obviously, you don't. Again, do you want me to give you an example? I will anyway! If I show my three year old child not to go near the grill, when I'm cooking out because it's hot! I put my hand near it and go, "OWWEE" and shake my hand and pretend to be in pain, because she doesn't understand the actual words of me telling her not to do it. It literally means the same thing but I'm not using words.

[Wallythewalrus]

Are you retarded? Seriously. "MR. Walrus you have no idea what semantics is, do you"? You're asking me that question, correct?
"Why doesn't Mr. Walrus have a clue of what semantics is"? Who are you asking?

[ChefPapiChulo]

You have no clue about anything you are saying.

[ChefPapiChulo]

This is beyond you. Go kick rocks.

[ChefPapiChulo]

And just so you know that doesn’t mean you should literally go kick rocks, it’s a phrase.

[Anonymous]

Not always