
Anyone else know Trump ALSO had a rape case upcoming?


Yeah, I heard rumors about this. Apparently it happened to 20-30/ years ago way past the statute of limitations. Keep this crap up and Biden will have changed brought against him. Democrats have two options they can stop this crap or we could have a mutual insurance destruction how much Kaze no politician you say whatsoever anything any politician has done horrible in their life they will be going to jail doesn’t matter if they’re 17 and had a beer under age like they were trying to do with Brett Kavanaugh this is dangerous if we want to have a country we need to stop doing this
So you are more interested if the statute of limitations has run out rather than if Trump raped someone or not? Also, why would it be wrong to prosecute those that have done wrong? I would be 100% in favor of nailing Biden if he raped someone and I would find it strange if someone did not share my views on this subject.
@Soteris I'm with you 100%. Trump fanatics here don't think like that. They truly believe the guy has done no wrong ever and it's what about Biden as a deflection to everything when in fact... it's like yeah... If Biden does something really bad... I'm not going to defend him... But you can't just say what about hunters laptop like that means anything lol. If they can prosecute any politician because they have evidence of wrongdoing then do it...
@Soteris unfortunately there really no way of proving rape years later. This is why it’s important if a women is raped she goes to the police immediately. It’s hard to prove a month later much less 20-30 years. If trump raped someone she should have come forward when it happened. If we prosecute or sued everyone who had a man women come forward 2-3 decades later no ma would be safe to have sex with any women ever again. Dude becomes famous women steps forward he slept with 20 years ago and claim it’s rape and she gets millions of dollars and/or put in prison for the rest of his life.
What are we suppose to do have an contract written by a lawyer have have both parties sigh it before they have sex
@Friendlybro79 Oh, sorry I wasn't clear. No, it's not proven that the DNA is Trump's, just that there was DNA on the dress. Of course, the obvious thing for the accused to do would be to give a DNA sample to exonerate himself.
@Stoner710
Yeah, I am exactly zero percent worried that any woman I have slept with would accuse me of rape in 20 years. It is not something a normal human being is concerned about, nor should he. If you are living a life where that is a legitimate threat to you then maybe the problem is not with them but with you.
@Soteris you also live in Sweden which hasn’t lost its sanity. We’re at a point in the United States where is you sleep with a girl and she regrets it a month later she can accuse you of rape or sexual assault when everything was consensual. My friend in college was smart and had a girl sigh a contract he wrote up a very simple one that said. “I give permission for this guy to have sex with me”. 1 month later she got a boyfriend and went to the school to tell them she was raped by my friend. Fortunately he had that makeshift contract that proved it was consensual otherwise he would be in jail to this day because he wouldn’t be able to prove anything. In the United States if you sleep with a girl your life can be ruined
https://youtu.be/OsDXRlg_QV4
This isn’t a joke in the United States anymore
@Friendlybro79 Yeah, what he is talking about is simply not a realistic concern. Either he is living inside a bubble and being terrified of imaginary threats, or he is lying. Its hard to tell with these people though which one it is.
Again, there are two possible interpretations of your claims. Either, something incredibly unlikely happened where they got accused for something they did not do. Or, they got accused for something they DID do and then tried to use this as a defense. I am going to be honest here, the second option sounds much more persuasive.
@Soteris yeah, I saw the paper it was pretty clear. Do I have permission to have sex with you dairy a box yes or no she sighed the yes one. I saw it of course this was early in the night and alcohol was involved I’m not sure what happened after I left but next thing I knew he was getting accused of sexual assault and that stupid little not professional at all paper got him off
@Stoner710 having even 100 examples out of the billions of people having sex would be anecdotal. Regardless. Go get women to sign papers if that makes you feel better if you think this is such a widespread concern.
That sounds unlikely. If it was brought to court then that paper would be most likely thrown out since it was signed while under intoxication. The more I hear about it the less convinced I am.
A far more credible series of events would be for someone who knows they are about to commit something that might not be legal to try get the law on their side prematurely, especially if they used alcohol to make the other party more likely to sign a contract of sorts.
Furthermore, such a contract is probably also worthless in the first place. It could show that the woman was initially agreeable to having sex but all it would take would be for her to change her mind and the situation changes and if he continues after that then it would still be rape. Basically, this whole situation sounds like bullshit to me.
@Soteris maybe she sighed it after during our first beer liquor was brought out later, of course. The thing is, she said nothing about until a month later, when she finally got a boyfriend. Either way because of that piece of hair, my friend, and I get expelled. But I’d like to refer you to the Aziz Ansari case he takes a girl out they go back to his place they start messing around. She then says she’s uncomfortable they snuggle on the couch and go back to getting hot and heavy (again alcohol was involved). Alcohol does impair the senses and you do things you would not normally do ironically, this was the point of the prohibition moment I don’t support prohibition, but they had a point.
Fair enough, lets talk about the Aziz Ansari case because from what you have told me of that it throws up some major red flags. More specifically, the alcohol and how she aborted the intimacy once because she was uncomfortable yet the guy presumably made another go for it after getting her drunk first. That sounds suspiciously like him trying to use alcohol to make her change her mind and have sex which would be a sexual assault in my opinion.
@Soteris maybe both Aziz and the girl were drinking. Alcohol makes you do what you Normandy don’t do. If she didn’t want to have sex she should have left when she said she felt uncomfortable. That is the rational response. Men and women’s alcohol tolerance are fairly similar. According to. https://www. mpowerwellness. com/blog/vodka-shots-to-get-drunk Women can have 3-4 shots and men 5. Not much difference. Lets they both drank half a fifth, When your that drunk your mind isn’t rational. It can’t be only the man’s fault if the have sex. It’s both of there faults. If she was drunk and he was sober I see how it’s sexual assault. But when your both drinking heavily it’s both there faults if they have sex and one regrets it the next day. That you made a mistake and learn from it. But now the man’s life is ruined because the both drank the same amount.
Of course the way you can avoid all this is a Bandan in the ideas of the sexual revolution but I don’t think we’re gonna do that so we do need to find some middle ground here
That does not mean that Aziz did not commit a crime, especially if it was premeditated. If I get drunk and then murder someone I can't use the fact that I was drunk and did something I normally would not do as a way to prove my innocence. It is also victim blaming to accuse the woman of actually wanting the sex because she did not outright leave after saying she was uncomfortable with sex the first time. She has the right to say "No" and have that be respected rather than getting her drunk so he could try again. In what world should she live in fear that at any sign of something she does not personally want means that she should immediately flee the situation? That is completely unreasonable and inhumane.
It is also very reasonable to assume that you can enjoy alcohol with someone without them trying to have sex with you when you are too drunk to say no. She is not at fault for simply drinking alcohol.
SO not only have you blamed the victim two separate times but also tried to excuse the crime by blaming alcohol and then try to sweep it under the rug by claiming "Mistakes were made, learn from them in the future". No. Fuck that flawed logic. If you sexually assault people when drunk then that is YOUR problem that YOU need to prevent and not the fault of whatever victim who can perfectly well drink in public without being a danger to anyone else.
@Soteris in what world does saying no not leaving and instead of getting intoxicated and you did not commit a crime and you gave consent while you were drunk this is called the post sexual revolution. Women aren’t stupid. If you don’t want to have sex with a guy you don’t go up to his apartment start making out with a guy and once you say you’re uncomfortable you leave you don’t stay and get drunk. When you know the guy already wants to have sex with you. To quote Macbeth “drink bring apon 3 thing 1 urine 2 marryment and 3 desire unfortunately it weakens the desire”. Murder you’re killing someone sex you can’t tell if it’s sexual assault a drunken stupor or actual rape. If women are around should men not be allowed to drink? Because that stuff happens even in Shakespeare back in the 1500s was talking about this.
The solution is abandoned the ideas of the sexual revolution. Make sure that men and women are supervised. When dating. I will go back to that scene in the Godfather where Michael Corleone his girlfriend at the time Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone went on a walk date and her parents walked an out of ear shot distance behind them. Why do there not having sex before There married. We don’t do that anymore so what happens? The Aziz Ansari case.
Watch the first 3 minutes rest of after there married https://youtu.be/qMzTLWiSXK8
Saying that a woman can't stay and enjoy a drink without giving consent to rape her is like saying a woman should not dress as a whore if she did not want to be raped. It is victim blaming and it is stupid. Also I dont know if you know this but sex is about consent. If all she wants to do is kiss, then all you get to do is kiss. If all she wants to do is have normal sex, then you can't just start fucking her asshole without permission. I can't believe we need to have a grown up conversation about consent here. Furthermore, she is allowed to change her mind. If she was up for sex at one point but does not want to anymore, then though luck. Sucks to be you. This also applies to men since I know you are SUCH an advocate for mens rights (sarcasm).
Even if she is INTENTIONALLY leading him on. Even if she INTENTIONALLY exposes herself to rape. Even if she DOES NOT STOP IT, that is still RAPE. Once again for those who are in the back of the class and not paying attention, sex is about consent and without it becomes rape. It matters not where she was, what she was wearing, if she was drinking or what she was doing. What matters is if she gave consent or not and considering she had already signaled that she did NOT consent, that is a major fucking red flag.
It is not hard to not be a rapist fucking piece of shit. You say it like "Well she was drunk and unable to resist so OF COURSE I SHOULD FUCKING RAPE HER AGAINST HER WILL" is an obvious course of action. It is not. Only rapists think like that and quite frankly, that says more about you than it does about me.
@Friendlybro79 Oh, I am well aware of him. We have "engaged" for a very long time and I have already established that he is a dishonest troll. We probably do this like at least once a week although he has been avoiding me recently.
@Stoner710 I’d advise you to rewrite your last entry. It sounds like you’re condoning stepbrothers to rape their step sisters. Which I know you’re not.
I’m not, If consent is all that matters you have an older couple get married one has a 18 year old daughter, and one has a 20 year old son, and they decide to have sex with you condone that if consent is all that matters? Or why not a brother having sex with his brother consensually? Do you have 18-year-old and a 20 year old boy two gay brothers having sex with each other it’s all consent right is considered all that matters or is there some other morality that needs to be considered other than consent?
Quite frankly? They are grown adults and I personally dont care that much what they do in the privacy of their own home. There would be a problem with pregnancy during incest but that is an issue with genetics and birth defects, not a moral problem of them doing something "wrong" in my opinion.
yes, Id like to understand how and why NYC changed the law that made it possible.
got into some trouble recently as she was funded by a democrat donor, so there's more discovery.
they are throwing everything at him and best way to destroy a man is by "sex" charges. Women sure cause a lot of problems for men since they are so alluring. Maybe we'd be better off if they were covered up like in Afghanistan?
Interesting noone ever mentions all the work /benefit he did for Mrs USA pagents... you'd think there'd be all sorts of assault, rape etc.. charges.. but not a peep.
In other news... countries are moving out of the US dollar, Russia is erasing Ukraine, and commercial real estate bubble is popping and a few banks failed but were bailed out with infinite government backstop. There's no problems going...
This is what I was talking about. Question is, what inspired this law change. I'd bet you some dough it was "get Trump". This strikes me as opening up a pandoras box, so wouldn't shock me if this law is reverted his trial.
www.businessinsider.com/new-york-adult-survivors-act-sexual-assault-trump-jean-carroll-2022-11
Ah, my apologies for doubting you. NY is not the only state that passed such a law, several others did too, without having Trump in the crosshairs, but I don't suppose the prospect of seeing Trump go to trial hindered the passing of the law at all!
The defamation case I mentioned was filed in 2019, while Trump was still president and well within the 1 year statute of limitations. (You might remember Trump tried to claim he was acting in his official capacity as POTUS at the time.) I think the two cases have been combined.
Here in California, feminists got upset when they couldn't ruin a man's life if the alleged incident (sexual assault, rape, looking at them wrong, etc - you get the idea) happened too far in the past. So the government changed the law. NOW - it doesn't matter when she says it happened at least in CA. So whatever place this is being held in might have done the same thing.
@goaded ok, the timing sure is suspect. Eithe way, I'm saying that sure opens up pandoras box for a lost of men doesn't it? There's a reason for statue of limitations.
In one sense, it should be a slap across the face of all males to be very careful with females and thus, reduce such crimes. Anyone that touches a drunk/medicated female is either stupid or crazy. Even then, people/women can have false memories or simply a different perspective. Women can ruin a mans life fast, they'd better wake up. In a sense, the law is good if people used their brain as it forces return to traditional behaviors.
Funny... there's statute of limitations on other crimes that are just as bad. weird.
how many billionaires go round raping women? and how many women wait decades to complain
could be just more lies on trump
i'm sure he can but it's one more example of abuse of power
umm when he was elected they investigated russian hoaxes none were true all made up... o'bama was caught spying on his campaign nothing... he was impeached for a perfect phone call at 1st different allegations... they exagerrated jan 6th and they made 3 attempts but didn't have the goods... it's endless with these quests to bring trump down... while biden is caught taking money from china money laundering with ukraine
If the Russia investigation was BS why’d so many trump fcks go to jail?
https://youtu.be/cUPd6TqHQdA
even though it was made up the FBI didn't know it exactly... stone wasn't completely truthful even though it was a lie and neither was flynn... infact they plain out extorted him... keep believing in the dark state... you had over 50 cities burned down due to phony black lives matter... you had soft laws introduced and lowering crimes where 1,000 of offenders are allowed back on the street... not forgetting defunding the police... not forgetting biden's great idea of not pumping oil anymore in the usa so we can have a beautiful planet in 50 years... all makes sense
i guess your a racist and don't care about all the blacks that are getting killed in democrate inner cities so sit on your fat white ass and don't worry about people and support dark government it's people like you who destroyed america
Opinion
10Opinion
The statute of limitations ran out on this 30 years ago. President Trump has denied this and where was this woman 30 years ago? It is just a way to prevent President Trump from getting re-elected. The more this happens the more money he raises and the more he goes up in the polls. He raised over 15 million dollars sinc ethe indictment. a third of it were from first time donors.
Stormy Daniels says trump has a tiny mushroom dick on jimmy kimmel live its on youtube
Pretty sure that irregardless 20 or 30 years is beyond the statute of limitations so this is irrelevant.
Smells like another bullshit witch hunt to me and the people after Trump have already proven themselves to be reprehensible, disgusting reprobates who lie at every opportunity.
I read that Trump is responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs, the Biblical Flood and Pre Menstrual Syndrome in women. If CNN and MSNBC say it, it must be true. Would the mass media ever make anything up?
I didn't know about this can you link an article for me
thanks mate
Yea , some ugly bitch that if she tried prostitution she would go bankrupt.
Yes, I knew about it, and in this case I believe Trump - He has never been into old women.
Yes, I did indeed know that.
He had several. All of which turned out to be bunk. I have no doubt this will be bunk too.
Yay! We're back to believing all women!
Like Kamala Harris saying she believes the claims of sexual harassment against Biden?
Oh, it's only court where we believe all women. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
@gorydetails Actually yeah it was nonsense.
www.vanityfair.com/.../brett-kavanaugh-fbi-investigation
No shit, Sherlock. But you were 100% right there slamming him at the time. Another bang up job by the FBI.
Whatever happened to Biden’s accuser?
You can also add your opinion below!