Will Women Ever Rule The World? Is That Day Near? What Could Change?

[ArrowNik]

With women gaining more rights day by day and even more political power I wonder if we are close to the day when Women will reverse the societal order and become the majority in powerful positions and institutions. Will they ever rule the world? If yes when and how could a world ruled by women be different from the one we live in today? Will women compassion help international relations? Will there be more peace and less war? Tell me your opinions about that.

Yes, they will. Men are losing grip

No, they will not. Men grip is too strong.

They will have to settle for a 50/50 distribution of power

[Miristheiss]

No. People men are the fighters, the aggressors, the builders, the inventors, the hard workers, they actually are the FORCE that enforces EVERY law. Women can only "RULE" if the men do the work and enforce women "ruling".

Women... they won't build a single house, bridge, building, road, overpass, bridge, dig a single ditch, they won't produce any food or farm or grow things, they won't be plumbers, electricians, maintain the electrical grid, the won't work on oil rigs to harvest energy, they won't lay bricks, operate cranes, front loaders, excavators, they won't build roofs in the sun, move furniture, they won't do all of the things that BUILD a society and INFRASTRUCTURE and ECONOMY... but they want to sit in air conditioned offices on a computer and RULE the world.

The gall. The pride, ego and self entitlement.

If the wars come and the country is invaded and there is a draft... the men get drafted... the women don't. The men do the vast majority of the winning or losing fighting. But they want to have say over all of this... when they have ZERO skin in the game.

[Unit1]

In a way women already rule certain parts of this world. Just take a look at marriage and divorce in the USA and child custody/support. Maybe Europe and Russia too. Women usually have all the cards in that sense.

However we are still far away from women ruling this world.

Most women still can't ask men out on dates to begin with 😂 Or if not interested in that, i have yet to see more women doing big money things such as being a trader, an investor, having powers in society beyond their youth and beauty, whatever.

[joeND]

only a 2023 man would allow that. if you let women control you , you won't be happy, love needs to be 50/50 . It was 100/0 favoring men, before 1960. Now it is 100/0 favoring women, for many men, and the reason for hi divorce rate. My parents divorced in 1970, before that it wasn't done. Do you think Womens lib had somethng to do with high divorce rates? I do.

[Unit1]

@joeND Without diving too deep into this subject, i prefer it when women can walk out of toxic relationships and marriages but without automatically granting them the vast resources just because.

[hahahmm]

Women ruling is an illusion. You can see that when you look at the trans stuff. We're one nut hair away from men taking over 100% of women's sports, jobs, spaces. Of course men won't allow it. The experiment where we let women lecture us about how we shouldn't be mean to people is over.

[BasedBaeBecca]

It's hard to say if or when women will rule the world, as it's a complex and multi-layered issue. But women are already making strides in breaking down gender barriers and gaining powerful positions in many parts of society. It's important to remember that progress often occurs incrementally and over time. While more women in positions of power can bring a unique perspective and potentially make positive changes, it's also important to recognize that women are not a monolith and can have different views, priorities, and concerns. Progress in gender equality will require more than just women in power but changes in systems and attitudes.

[Anonymous]

No. Because women are choosing to not pic those jobs which is completely fine. Jordan Peterson said it best. If you want quality of choice, then you can't have quality for outcome.

There is no law stopping women from applying in male dominant jobs/becoming politicians and so on. This is all based on the western world.

In the eastern world I'm not sure how it will go. But there is slow progress and I think it will get better but I doubt I will see it during my lifetime

[LiamJHayden]

Hard to say. In the past, female leaders have actually been more likely to start wars, but that could have been a product of how much harder they had to be in order to rise to the top in such a male dominated area.

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/history-says-that-female-leaders-are-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men

[zeitgeist057]

I think one factor is that women who rise to the top in a patriarchy are ones who display patriarchal values and strengths. It's not women who display "feminine" values and strengths. Basically to put it sort of rudely, those women in power are the butch ones. It's women who can win playing a "man's game". Which is different than a world with women in power who use the strengths of the "woman's game".

Think about political figures like Hilary Clinton or Sarah Palin, or dozens of others.

[hahahmm]

Past women leaders never saw themselves as feminists/doing stuff for women tho. They had tons of male advisors, and didn't try to change the 'world order' because after all, that existing world system allowed her to get to where she was. Those women didn't have the idea that they were victims in a gender war.

[Anonymous]

I think there are a lot of delusions about how the world would magically change if women were in charge. I don't actually think things would be so dramatically different because those in power tend to be the same types of people: you get a few really good ones who intend to help/change the world for the better, but for every one of those, there are 100 others who let power get to them and use their power for evil.

[nolookingbackx]

Wise words 👏

[joeND]

I Female Congress women from NJ once told Steve Adubato, "If women ran the US it would be worse, Women are more vindictive "

[strateguy632]

when women reach prime minister we notice the creepy policy. like new zealand she arranged mandatory vax but other countries encouraged but not mandatory. also people criticised lady golda meir bad decision in the war preparation. since then people are scared to vote women.

[hahahmm]

No... and the only way it could happen would be if women created some kind of bioweapon that killed off say 98% of men. There was some comic book with that idea back in the late 80s/early 90s. There was some tv show a few years back with the idea that all the men died off due to some natural disease. In both stories women broke into two groups: predators and prey. The violent/butch women just started killing, robbing, raping, dominating the meek women.

[hahahmm]

In the comic version, civilization didn't collapse. In the tv version it all fell on day 1 except a few government bureaucracies but those got destroyed by armed rebellion too.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

What we’re seeing now with an uprise in conservative values alongside a focus on prioritizing men in society and their desires for traditional households and having a housewife-mother bride is what is known as an “extinction burst” meaning if you give this world 10 years, you will see all the boomers dead and more progressive, liberal, and leftist millennials and gen z politicians taking office to correct the damage caused by the individuals in power now.

[zeitgeist057]

Interesting prediction; time will tell. Those boomers had the same prediction, and the generations before likewise. It's a loooooooong history of blaming the previous generation for everything that's wrong.

[Avicenna]

The West is not going to be significant in the world in the years to come, which by itself means there will not be female domination of the world. Women are significantly outnumbered by men in key countries like China, India and Pakistan and societies in Asia and the Middle East are patriarchal in a way the West hasn't been in a long time.

[RavVid]

A lot of female members of parliament are there because there is preferential selection of female candidates.

In female to female interactions women do try to show compassion and support to each other but it is a complete crock most of the time. They are just following a script which gives that appearance when in fact they aren't. Women are a lot more ME oriented and they will cause a lot of wars if they are allowed to.

[Dargil]

Rosie answered her calling and did a fine job. She may be called again.

Government, courts, media and whatever artificially extol women. It will disappear when the next crisis arrives. They will cling to us, again. Feminism is a scam that men enable because the pussy is easy. It will dry up.

[Meropatrick]

It would get honestly bad. And bitter. I. Have seen how women can be cruel in arguments and brawls towards eachothers. Imagine the amount of petty wars going on. Id say if women ruled the world. A nuclear war would happen sooner than we think over silly reasons like one female president making fun of another female president outfit or so. I trust a world run by men more. A man would fuck Something up and have no way wriggle out of it and blame it on that time of the month😂

[ChooChooHaha]

Petty Wars? Have you seen what's happening now?

[nolookingbackx]

I don't like this competitive atmosphere at all and I will not support anyone just because of their gender. It's good to have equal chances but people willing to succeed in any field should prove their competence.

[joeND]

Only reason Hilary got the votes she did. f she were Male she would have gotten little support.

[nolookingbackx]

@joeND I think so too.

[Tyrael]

As long as they're competing with men, they'll only get in power by adopting the same formidable and aggressive attitude that men employ. And that type of personality is not common among women. So no I don't see it happening.

[ChooChooHaha]

Oh, if you men only knew...

[Anonymous]

Ask Hillary Clinton. The country said we'd rather have an internet meme (Trump) than you. I think that has to tell you all you need to know. I think women will never rule because women can't even agree with each other long enough to get a consensus.😆

[DubiousIntentions]

No, they are too busy getting knocked up.

[rigmarole]

Nope. The world is not going to be ruled. Global dictatorship is only a left wing lunatic fantasy.

[ArrowNik]

By "rule the world" I mean to represent the majority in seats of power as governments, financial institutions, ownership of global wealth. The form of government is not relevant, I am talking about a world where, for example the presidents of USA,, UK, European Countries ecc.. are mostly women as well as most CEO, ecc...

[rigmarole]

There's not a chance in hell. Even the commies that push that shit as propaganda to play fools like you as pawns don't believe in it. It's completely against their religion. If you took the time to study them, then you know they just want to turn left wing atheists against Christians in order to destroy both. They want to turn men against women in order to destroy both. They want to turn gays against straight to destroy both. They want to turn blacks against Whites to destroy both. The "elites" that rule left-wing politic strongly believe in centrally controlled power and a man must always be in control It's core to their religion.

[Anonymous]

Yeah. They will rule the world, through democracy, for a short period, before their incompetence dooms everyone. And then there will be a massive reset where men are in control again. Leave the world to women, or even an absurd notion like 50/50 men and women, and everything will be destroyed. I recently learned Budhha said the same thing after reluctantly allowing women into leadership roles in his "church".

[FunkyMonkee]

What makes you think they don't?

https://www.youtube.com/embed/PRbnTNL4UAM

[Anonymous]

I absolutely hate Rosie. She really fucked it up for a lot of us women.
Some of us don’t wanna ‘yes we can’
Some of us wanna stay home and be housewives.

[aquamarine321]

No matter how it may seems now, women can never or will ever rule the world because they are lazy , plus they can bearly make it through the day even on their days

[zeitgeist057]

Men are lazy, too. Humans are lazy. This is the main issue with government and corruption. Idealistic politics like communism and socialism don't work not because there is a flaw in the logic, they don't work because laziness leads to corruption when those in power are looking out for themselves so they can sit back in luxury and take advantage of those who are not. The same thing happens in capitalism, only it's money that is power and those with it sit on their fat stacks in laziness and luxury while preaching to those impoverished busting their asses with 20 hours of overtime a week that they just need to work harder.

[aquamarine321]

You miss the point women are lazy men are lazy, plus if men where lazy we wouldn’t be ruling the world now and for thousands of years, plus women don’t have what it takes and all men would have to give up there post and stop majority of the hard labor and allow all women to take over, but they can’t or won’t because they are lazy and want to stay pretty and talk shit

[aquamarine321]

@Zeitgeist

[zeitgeist057]

yeah men work hard sometimes, but some of that is motivated ultimately by laziness. I am pushing hard to work through school, work overtime, get degrees and certifications. But really to be honest a lot of my motivation is I want to get paid more for my time so that I have to work less to make more, and then have more money and free time to pursue my recreational activities.

There is a point where it becomes habit and I just enjoy working hard, it's a reward in itself. Men ruling the world isn't about not being lazy, it's about being more aggressive, IMHO.

[zeitgeist057]

@aquamarine321 for some reason I can't tag you in this other conversation I'm having on another post, but its VIVANT's question and I thought it kind of related to what we are talking about here. The concept of "strength through adversity", pushing hard on something makes you stronger and is its own reward.

[aquamarine321]

Hmm, but women still can’t and won’t

[zeitgeist057]

not my experience/perception. I know a lot of women who work just as hard if not harder. In firefighting particularly, women who hang with us are typically some of the better workers. They might not have the upper body strength, but they are tenacious and driven.

[SolitarySolace]

Won't happen because of feminism and all the misandry. If women want to be a protected class they don't get to be in major positions of power. Can't have your cake and eat it too

[joeND]

interesting take, women seem to have all the rules in their favor, Domestic disputes, men are considered wrong by police. A cop told me this is how the cops are trained. I wouldn't ever marry a woman today , they want everything their way. I want no part of that. Sex isn't that great. Once they marry the sex ends because women aren't into sex.

[nolabels]

Women have been ruling the world since time began.