1. Many men are not as physical and mentally strong as their past generations 2. many couples follow role reversals, no. Of house husband is increasing 3. Women are more stronger than ever 4. Many women who workout are even stronger than average males who don't workout 5. Many women started to demand matriarchal society
Will we be living in a matriarchal society? Is the future really female?
Will the future be led by women? Is the future female?
Post Opinion
119 Opinion
Like
Share
Follow
7 likes
What is your opinion?
Add Opinion
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
I don't think so. Men are just more competitive like they would do over time without that much complain while most women care about work life balance and men don't mind travelling or coming late at night while women don't really like it competing with people who won't say no is hard
9
1 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
And men have more diversity in term of IQ so most high iq people are men
Yes, but for none of the reasons listed in the original question.
The genus Homo, of which humans are the only surviving species is over 2 million years old and that's a lot of time for evolution to work.
The nature of sex between males and females boils down to two facts: 1. Because sperm are cheap and limitless and males do not give birth, their prime reproductive directive is "Fuck early, fuck often, fuck as many as you can." Taken from a species perspective, males are responsible for genetic diversity. 2. Because eggs are few, each is priceless. Combine that with women being the actual builders and nurses of the next generation, their prime reproductive directive is "Make these eggs count!". So, she is going to be very selective about who she has children with. This makes women the real architects of humanity. The human species that we are today is due to the selections that women over tens of thousands of generations have made.
Remember that: Women are the architects of humanity. They may not have planned it, but we are what they have chosen us to be.
And what have they chosen we males to be? Look at the traits desirable to women: * Height * Muscular physique * Virility * Intelligence * Courage * Willingness to assist females etc. Why these traits? Because these traits: 1) Better to help her keep her children alive - to feed them and protect her and the kids from threats. 2) If she has male children, she wants them to have these traits as well so her grandchildren (etc) have a better chance to survive.
And, lo and behold, over all that time, humans now capable of anticipating or thwarting or mitigating almost all other threats in the natural world.
The greatest remaining threat is each other.
But, males have fulfilled their obligation. We have done our job. We mastered this world and are now the dominant species and no other species threatens us.
Much of that conquest was through competition and violence... and now the only real threat is to each other and the threats from the natural world because of our actions.
This means that males themselves are part of the current problem and that the way in which we have solved those problems will not solve the problems that we face. Indeed, the way of males is causing many of these problems.
I spoke about male evolution but females are evolved differently. In short, they are evolved to be more empathetic, cooperative, and communicative. These are the very traits necessary for humans to dial down the threats from each other. These are the traits necessary for thinking on a larger scale to us... to keep all of our children and the future of our species alive.
Don't get me wrong. Males will always be important because we have certain traits that females will always need and they evolved us to be their protectors. That role will never cease. But, for our species to survive on this planet, it is best for women to begin to run things. It won't be easy because many women have other traits which are not as good as ours and this can lead to ineffectiveness, but that's another story.
Anyway, bottom line: For the modern world to survive, it is in the best interests for more women to lead and perhaps hold the majority of leadership positions in the fundamental parts of society.
"The future is female" is a phrase from an essay by avowed Feminist Sally Miller Gearheart, in which she advocates for reducing men to 10% of the human population. It's a call for genocide, and where I come from, we call that a death threat.
Specific phraseology aside, no. Very few women actually want to be in positions of great power; they just want the power. The responsibilities that come with it are not something most women would like, and damn few people of ANY gender want to make the sacrifices required in putting in the hours to REACH a position of power, much less maintain it. Most of the people who do are men. Now, there are some women who do, and are, and good for them- let them have the same chances that men do. But very few will.
I will give you that men, on average, are less physically strong than previous generations were; that's what comes of having a far smaller portion of them doing manual labor, and most of that being increasingly automated. I will need some major evidence to take seriously any claim that they've gotten mentally weaker, though- if anything else, the realization that chromosomes needn't limit the social roles you can fulfill is evidence to the contrary. "I am a slave to nature because of the way I was born" doesn't exactly scream "mentally strong".
Now, the idea that women would be happier if women ran the world is one that, bluntly, I'm having a hard time not laughing at. Have you SEEN what happens when women compete with each other for power? The primary social difference between humans and chimps is that our males work together- it's actually pretty crazy when you compare us to ANY similar primate.
Traditional gender roles weren't made up to "oppress" anyone; they came about naturally as a result of the conditions we evolved in, and into. It's quite reasonable to say that they're overly restrictive, and this is a part of why most first world societies have been increasingly tolerating moving away from them, but evolution doesn't stop at the neck, and it didn't cease applying to us just because very few of us are eaten by lions these days. This is why you see a higher proportion of female engineering students in Iran than in, say, Sweden- people naturally gravitate towards where biology pushes them; they fight it generally only when they have to.
If you mean a woman woman not girly woman then yes it'd be great to have a woman take charge but I don't think a lot of women based simply on the comments have the courage to stand tall for themselves.
It's sad how much women have lost logic over emotions but honestly this goes for men too. Many men are just as arrogant in their biased and closed minded beliefs.
In the end the best option would be like a family option instead of one person in charge a female and male can be placed in charge with different views capable of coming down to an agreement. Opposites mix well if they are willing to place thier prides aside.
If you mean feminists taking over no, honestly I think most feminists are becoming really unstable and lack maturity. Intelligence and emotions can turn deadly.
So do I think women will rule the world, no. Why because they simply do not believe in themselves and their capabilities to be mentally strong over men. Men may look or seem mentally strong but it's a facade. No offense to you men just know a lot of you seem to need a lot of time to mature in a healthy effective manner.
If humans grow up we can all just live a life were we help each other without bias or judgment. Then life would be brilliant.
You're observations are laughable. Especially bullet 4. Women are not stronger than men, even if they work out. Case in point, about 13 years ago, the American Women's Soccer team who won a gold medal, lost to a boy's high school JV soccer team.
Right now as things stand, men are just getting lazy. If they decide to end this little feminism experiment, it would be over tomorrow if all the men in the US said it was over. Women tend to have to hide behind the authorities when threatened by men.
The worse thing facing men is all these man-childs being raised by all these single mom's, and father's from single moms. They are clueless, and what they are teaching boys explains a lot of why they're are either weak, or wanting to become women.
Don't kid yourself, they're are still real men out there. Just because you see a lot of Eunuch around you is not some great opportunities to become a tribe of bonobo monkeys, especially given that other aggressive patriarch countries would almost attack and slay the men, the purple hair empowered women and any version of human they will be displeased with.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
No. The future is rather unclear. It remains a mystery.
1. That means 2 things. 1) men need to make more money first and foremost and spend less money on CS:GO crates and then 2) have enough money piled up to hit the gym on the regular and not shy away from consulting with a psycho-therapist and get on meds and anti-depressants. Men aren't all made of titanium to tolerate toxic masculinity.
2. And how is that correlated to the future being female? Unlike women in the past those men in the present choose to be house-husbands.
3. Stronger as in? Like it's a bad thing. No, it's not bad. It means women can sustain themselves and be autonomous without being codependent on mr. money-provider and having a toxic degenerate ruining her day. About time.
4. No surprise here at all. Put these men into the gym and they'll turn stronger too. What's stopping the men? Is it the lack of finances? Then read number 1 again.
5. From my point of view so far men in charge like governments, politics and all those 3-4 letter agencies didn't do a great job maintaining society. In fact they have pretty much failed. That's why we have poverty, most jobs paying low, education not sponsored, public healthcare being rather mediocre and so on. If women started running society I can't really expect much to change. As long as it's not being run by some crazy feminazis of course. There are however shows out there showing a group of men and a group of women separately trying to survive on an island for a period of time with the women's group pretty much heading towards starvation. Just saying.
1. Our instincts of being competitive is still present and it only seem like we exert less effort is because of how the world is having a great development and technology making our lives easier and also for women to work as well. But in places like construction sites, power plants, sewers, mines, military and other dangerous work places, most workers there are still men. The only thing is that you don't have to work in those kind of places to make a living.
2. And so what if they're increasing? The amount of house husbands is still way to far from being on par with housewives. And even if they're on par with the house wives, that doesn't make it a woman's world just like how it was never a man's world in the first place because both genders needs each other to survive.
3. Stronger but are they on par with men's strength? Naturally women don't get the same amount of testosterone men have so if women are getting stronger, they don't get strong as fast as guys.
4. Why are you only talking about many women who work out? There are also many men who work out. And sure many women who work out may be stronger than the average male but those women working out are not the average female which is less stronger than the average male.
5. I don't guarantee they're all taken seriously knowing how disastrous their tantrums are and knowing the world is pretty much equal with both having their pros and cons.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
No. Patriarchal societies are stronger than matriarchal societies. That's why all of the most successful cultures are/were patriarchal.
In matriarchal societies, or I'd say feminised societies like ours, what you tend to get is behaviour which weakens the culture as a whole, leading to internal collapse or invasion by a stronger culture.
We're in self-destruct mode in the West. Absolutely everything is backwards.
Culture comes from the people. The biggest myth people in the West believe is the "blank slate theory". The idea that our behaviour is mostly nurture rather than nature, as if we don't inherit personality traits from our parents.
The reason you should understand this is simple - it means that if the people of your culture don't have enough children, your culture is on the way out. A low birthrate = your culture is unsustainable.
3
3 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
Not only that, when the men are weak your country is on the way out. The future is China. They have "masculinity training" for their boys while our boys are taught to abandon masculinity and cry more.
I don't think that it comes 100% naturally, unlike femininity. It's probably 50/50 nature vs nurture, and it's like a muscle.
Strength (body and mind) is an important masculine trait. You build strength through struggle. You build strong muscles by struggling with heavy weights. If you don't challenge yourself physically your muscles atrophy and you stay weak. Same thing with strong mind.
If you feel like it's natural most probably you had a strong male influence in your life somewhere. Many men in the West don't, they're taught how to think entirely by women, or weak men who think like women. This is why matriarchy will never last.
Nah. Not even remotely. The weak men will die out and the stoic men will still be here. And I know who you are, OP. You seem to have a submission kink. Especially when it comes to physically strong women. You imply to be a very physically weak, short male, but most males aren't like you.
2
3 Reply
Asker
+1 y
I'm not a submission link, U can clearly see the difference between the past and present
It's a cycle. Zoomers are already more based than the Millennial trash ever could be. You just got to wait for the high tide to wash away the trash on the shore. Most Millennials are still in their mid twenties and thirties, and the oldest Zoomer is only 24, so give it another 5-10 more years.
Yeah I disagree with this especially after you said women that work out are physically stronger than men that don’t. An average male can take out a fit female.
Rhonda Rousey isn’t an average girl that works out. She is a trained boxer and any boxer has an advantage of normal people, that’s why it’s illegal for them to street fight.
Growing up I was always stronger than all the boys my age. If I was consistent in working out I could probably over power most average American makes who didn't work out, but it my case it is more genetics more than anything else
@Subarugirl that’s very rare with girls, or your brothers just didn’t go as hard because they know better. They could probably all over power you now. Realism VS feelings.
I am 6 ft tall and was incredibly athletic while I was in school and could beat most of the guys in my class arm wrestling my Sr year of high school. Statistically men are usually taller and stronger on average because of biology, but that isn't always true.
@Subarugirl I believe you but honestly density in women is different from men. Men are built for it. They’re extremely rare cases like yours, but averagely men can beat a woman’s ass. That’s why there’s laws to men hitting women
No, it is not. The current trend has been supported by: *The Left *the legal profession. *big corporations *the courts *the mass "news" media *the entertainment industry. *The academy. *public schools. *government *democrats *Very much like the race-hustling industry, this underpinning is all supported by peoples' money, either voluntarily spent or wealth transferred by taxation. But the future is grim. The deconstruction caused by the Obama and Biden administrations are bringing about economic collapse of the West, soon to be followed by the Western and Western-style nations. Paralleling that is the emergences of China, Russia and Iran who will interpret our weakness as an opportunity to expand. It can be argued that the Biden Administration is ushering in the end of the USA as a nation.
Societies becoming more matriarchal is actually seen a lot just before the collapse of nations. As Rome got closer and closer to collapse you saw more homosexuality and acceptance of like behaviors. Women gained more power and standing and then eventually the system just collapsed. Not saying that's the reason it's just a strange phenomenon I've noticed when studying history. We all have to remember that correlation does not equal causation. However, these facts give me pause and anxiety based on what the United States is focused on. I have a bad feeling we are going to collapse and get taken over because we are too weak and distracted by social issues. One only has to look at the goarmy advert the calling to realize we are becoming weaker as time goes on.
Lol the future is definitely not female. There's a very good chance that because women haven't accepted that they're equal to men and are pushing to be superior to them, that women will lose virtually all progress that they've made in feminism. You'll see companies start declining to hire women because of the hit to productivity that women cause, you'll see women lose certain rights, women will end up realizing just how much better it is to be a wife and mother than a single hag with 10 shitty kids from god knows how many men...
I'm not saying this because I want to see it, but women are digging their own graves here with the way they're acting today. I don't see it going well for them long term once people realize that women only have these opportunities because men allow them to.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 I think most women have issues differentiating reality from ideology. If you want proof look into how women don't understand the meaning of the word "average" and that fundamental lack of understanding relates to their worldview.
Women are more than capable, intellectually, of understanding these things if they back away from their emotions and push more heavily into logic and reason, however those are masculine thought patterns and don't tend to be how women think. The issue isn't equal potential, it is unequal effort and as a result outcome.
Why do you think women don't know the meaning of average?
There isn't a single scientific study that proves that women are more emotional than men. In fact the studies Doen in that sense showed that women are men are equally emotional, but they react to emotions differently. Men with anger and women with anxiety. Neither is good for decision making.
I am serious when I say I used to think they were more emotional and looked really hard to find suck a study, but there isn't one.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 Wow you're either completely ignorant of every bit of research that has been done on the topic or your just completely intellectually dishonest. I don't know which is worse.
@Yyyyu it wouldn't. In fact studies show that a mix environment is the best a company can have. It boosts productivity. This came from a Harvard study.
@Yyyyu That's not true at all. Men don't socialize at work, I've never seen a woman go a full half hour without having to talk to one of her work friends.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 I work night shifts now but when I was working in call centers, retail, food service, graphic design, and marketing we couldn't get women to be at their desks or their registers for long enough to even be able to call whatever the hell they were doing "working".
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 You also work in an industry that is virtually all men. So you really have the same issue with the feminine men; they aren't really men.
No, that is because women are inefficient in almost every field of work, their only good trait is analytics, but there still exists men who surpass them in even that. Most sciences, technologies throughout history has been done by men too, even when women lead or are monarchs of entire nations they still contribute almost nothing, this is an absolute fact. Yes, facts can be hurtful but it's better than white lies sugar coated as "truths"
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
No matter how much I complain about patriarchy, it would not be good for women to rule the future. Even today, women who are jealous of each other, women who try to look more beautiful than each other, women who try to seduce each other's lovers will rule the world in the future? I'm laughing my ass off at this.
3
22 Reply
Asker
+1 y
It's either Patriarchy or matriarchy Equality doesn't exist
Two things in this universe can't be equal
I got many stupid pathetic female politicians in my country
Damn it. Unfortunately I agree with you. The matter is the worst; if a war breaks out, women will never be able to deal with it. But men take courageous and logical decisions on many issues. They approach logically, not emotionally. The concept of equality is nothing but bullshit. Why equality when women are (physically) weak compared to men? I think they confuse justice with equality.
I'm sorry, but india is the swamp of south asia. The biggest example is the Ganges river. Haha Jokes aside, it's the dumbest thing for women to give a bride price to the man they're going to marry. what kind of country is this? Why did you call them bitches?
This dowry thing was followed during the ancient era by the kings and rich families as a symbol of bonding two families
But someway, somehow it followed till today and it became an abuse " If womens family doesn't give the amount of money asked by the mens family, they will physically and mentally abuse the woman "
This western culture adoration is present in all eastern countries. Unfortunately this popular western culture blows everyone's minds but there is nothing to do. For example, most women/girls in my country live in the house of the man they want before they get married. Eww
Women will never rule the world. As for men being mentally and physically weaker, that is a subset of MALES that are NOT men, they prefer dresses, wigs, makeup and having sex with men instead of women, I don’t know what the rest of the world calls them, but in the US we call them democrats
@rcljr And in the U. S. we call people like you a$$holes. Do you have a mother, daughter, wife? If you do, I feel terrible for them. Grow up. You're too old to behave this way.
@rcljr not hurt at all mr big bad internet bully who needs to demean others to feel better about themselves. You're weak in the mind and as far as your only strategy, being name calling, I thought I'd just give it back to ya since it's the only language you speak. Would you like to arm wrestle next or are you to hetero to touch another man's hand? You're pathetic
@rcljr right back at ya for not being able to handle mine. Sorry you are so sensitive and can't handle someone giving you a taste of your own medicine. I thought insults back and forth are how you do things? Should I treat you any differently? I could try to be civil and polite and even empathetic to JUST YOUR OPINION.. But if i did that then you'd be a snowflake wouldn't you? A snow flake who just wants to run their mouth because they can. Can't I do the same in the name of freedom!
Where did you do your reaseach. Those are mostly opinion statements. Testosterone has decreased for men and women. Women have always been strong and contribute to society. What about during ww2 when like 80% of women occupied the whole workforce, are you suggesting today's women work harder then they did?
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Let me tell you my success I I’ve had so far it’s thanks to man managers or man professors!!
You see it’s in our genes as a women to be jealous & Envy easily. That’s how it is and please don’t tell me I’m wrong. I have been there and I know it what I am saying. I’m a good looking women and I didn’t know why I was hated by young and old women in my university in my jobs in my internships , I would feel this constant “ ugh” from other women. I would get sudden hate ,, so many of them would imitate my cute soft voice I have... Because of course their voice was dry and manly. And no im not trying to act so special here it’s true. Im very kind , introvert , beautiful I learned that when I turned 28.. Ahhh that’s why I get so much hate from women. Thank god to man that I was able to carry on with my life ~ purse job I wanted promote etc. I have been with a women manager before she Was painfully bitc**. So please world LET BOTH man and women rule YIN & YANG period !
From what your saying you'd just come off as either annoying or conceited. Lol
I try not to judge though I know people have problems with understanding ego between self love.
Overall if you were simply nice for me you'd just be a girl who is nice. Beauty is not real, attractiveness is based on connection not image and if you really want to know how others see you ask them straight up. Don't assume people envy you cause everyone deals with demons that tell them to project how they think and a lot of times it's cause they feel ugly not that your pretty.
I understand what you are saying. However, envy is real and it exists between women. I’m even told that how clear than that do you want it lol. It’s ok I don’t worry about being kind and having problems with ego self love. I’m a hardcore introvert lol.
Everyone has different experiences. Because you didn’t go through it it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. Also because my life experience and opinion is different than yours it does mean I like empathy kindness or love or self whatever. Humans have 10 faces.. you might an even seen 4 of it
I don't think you comprehend me, envy is a reference to a personal projection of one self meaning it's not about you. It's about how the person perceives themselves to be or lacking. Which means if this person felt secure in themselves they would not envy you so this is simply a misunderstanding how lacking emotional knowledge of one self.
In regards to how you think or have experienced life it does not make your statement any more real then your own perceptions.
What you hide is your personal issues and what you use to show others who you are is your priority to overcome and learn from. If people need extra faces to hide who they truly are they have a lot of self love to learn. No one is perfect but you also shouldn't assume you are more then a mere adding distraction to one lacking in emotional stability.
You yourself have some growing to do but don't we all. 😉
Women who are desired by men, are most hated by other women. Same goes with genders reversed. There was a study showing that men whom women rated as "most attractive" were most described as having "punchable faces" by other men.
@someguycalledtom lol oh well🥺😂… looks doesn’t come with cute nose and attractive ears it all depends from how you carry yourself if you appear as an affluent women classy fit etc. Long story.
I'm all for women having equal representation in all aspects of life. I think it's only positive to have women and men work together on an equal footing. (still have some room to grow with this in my opinion)
Out of curiosity what data do you have to back your numbered points? You're stating them as a given or a fact, or is this more of your gut feeling/opinions?
I just like to understand where the stats are coming from. It's important that we understand things as fact vs i think. That said i don't disagree with everything. Regarding number 1 for example, I'd like to know where you came up with that.
Not really. The more women get power the weaker they become. They are making a more hierarchical structure. Ie women are pushing for polyamory. All thats happening is the top men are getting hoards of desperate women. The top men call all the shots when it used to be more give and take. Same with employment. Women fight for better jobs and now they get there and men are making automated and home based remote office companies (bye bye corner office) yet women are not risk takers and thus dont start their own companies and grow them like men do. So its just the harder they try the worse its getting for them basically.
Thus truly depends heavily on where in world you are. I know in large cities in Russia there are niches in which large majority of companies is started and led by domestic women. Nothing unusual also in some other places. Men can be just as well employed in companies led by women. Theur skills oe personality can win over a female candidate for a job. Woman can be neutral boss as well.
@sunshineglow there is one or two but you're right they are only in the female interest space. Which is generally relationships babys and homemaking. Not the kinds of categories to have any real power in the marketplace. Ofc there's Oprah but same thing. Id love to see a woman make a car company like ford or tesla, maybe the next amazon. I think women are capable but their lack of interest in those things they just can't do them ha so i guess they can't do them? Two ways to look at it.
Well again, such DO exist already even in technology. The fact you didn't hear for them doesn't mean that thes are not successful but that women are nore balanced emotionally and don't put whole focus on work and career. And are bot that much crazed to rule the world with their damn corporation. Small or middle size company is often enough for an appetite of a woman. I personally wouldn't like to own global and ultra large company. It's stupid, dangerous and irresponsible. Too many shady crap is going on on that level. I know a guy, is a brilliant engineer, worked in different niches and different countries, hired by different companies. He told me that he's never going back to USA, where his colleague (also engineer but who invented some significant improvement for their signature product) was kidnapped and killed by the rival company in the niche. Too crazy. Money and power crazed monkeys. No thank you.
I have a feeling no "gender" will rule anyway. Even now it's not really like so. Now a lot of politics are bent to meet wishes of feminists (I'm not, just noticing) or equalists. In future AI is more likely to be in charge, than anything else. Relax, just because men are not that much special with what you can do, doesn't mean we or the world don't need you. 😉
Most Helpful Opinions