How many people do you know are transgender?

[19magic]

As in: you know their names, ages, personality. And have met during your every day life (as in not gone to a meet and greet specific for LGBTs). Whether that's work, school, clubs, gym, concerts etc

So this is in relation to my last question and it's left me curious, some have said it's good to know how people live with transgenderism as a child.

So how many of you have met a transgender person in your life, so far I've met one and she was lovely, she never pushed it down your throat and other than her appearance, which was very obviously male, it was never mentioned. And since transgenderism is meant to be 0.5% of the population, I really am curious about the results.

00

01

02

3/4

5-8

9-15

16+

[zeitgeist057]

Funny thing is, this was sort of a hard question for me to answer, because I don't think of people as "men, women, and transgendered". I only really take note of nonbinary people as being outside of the men/women dichotomy. If someone is transgendered, I simply accept them as their identified gender. After that, they are not flagged in my mind, they blend in with all the other men/women.

Example: My old roommates were a couple, one a cis female, the other a female-to-male (FtM) transgendered person. I have always thought of him (the FtM) as male. I actually totally forgot about him when I selected my "3/4" answer above. I may be forgetting a few others as well, for the reason I stated above: I don't think of a person as a transgendered male, I just think of them as male (or female). Of course I'm aware subconsciously or in some cases I don't really know and I am not intimate enough with a person to feel it's appropriate to delve, nor is it necessary. So maybe I know a few more stealth transgendered people, or that are androgynous and I didn't really ask or it didn't come up in conversation, though I may still know their name, age, personality. For some people, their gender is a topic that pushes to the front, for others it's more personal and not something they bother to declare to everyone everyday. I don't go around declaring I'm nonbinary, though people use male pronouns with/for/on me, I don't feel the need to "make sure they know" how I identify. It's not important to me what other people know/perceive; for me, my gender is a personal matter. Like my spirituality and sexuality. I have no problem discussing it, but it's not like I buy groceries and tell the cashier, "I'll be paying with credit and I like to have sex with people who have vaginas.".

If someone is presenting as female, I accept they are female, unless they tell me they are male, then I accept that they are male. It's pretty easy, and very low stress. People who are always obsessed with what kind of genitalia everyone's got regardless of how they present, seem like it stresses them out a lot. I don't feel that involved about other people's business, so I don't have to stress about it.

[zeitgeist057]

oh lol I just thought of another person who I see pretty much weekly that fits this. A MtF who lives in my neighborhood, but I just think of her as this old lady. I mean, I am aware she has a penis and she's not stealth passing at all, but I just forgot when I was trying to think of "transgendered people I know". I think at this rate I would need to change my poll answer to 5-8 at least and maybe even the next category of 9-15. I mean, I really know her; she's the one who helped me get the job I've been at for the last 3 years.

[Lliam]

Two.

I met two middle-aged people through a local environmental organization I worked for. They were married, but apparently the husband had decided that he was a woman, went through the entire sex change thing and changed his name to Robin. Interestingly, his wife supported his decision. They're still married.

Robin was kind of tall and didn't make an attractive women, but "she" was good people. "She" didn't broadcast "her" original gender and just wanted to pass as female.
I had no problem with that at all.

I knew them for several years but haven't seen them for quite a while.

As it turned out, I heard that Robin became unhappy with "her" decision. "She" had physical pain and problems as a result of the drugs and surgery, and realized that the results of the sex change hadn't produced the promised results.

I met another guy named Conrad. He was short and in his mid-20s or so. Super cool dude. I later heard that "he" was a biological male who had fully "transitioned".
It didn't matter to me.

I have met teen girls who claimed to be "trans" and wore tags with their preferred pronouns. I knew that they had been mind fucked by their schools and social circles. I basically ignored them and had nothing to do with them.

I've never met any male twinks who acted like female parodies and claimed to be trans.

I've met several openly gay and lesbian people. I liked some of them and some of them made me sick.

[Anonymous]

Two. I know a MtF transgender who has been on hormone blockers for roughly 4 years now but hasn't had the surgeries or anything. And then my ex, Eli, he is a FtM transgender and he just got his surgeries done last year after 2 years of transitioning. He's my best friend.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

I know several, at least 5 that have come out to me since they know I'm an ally. One of which is one of my closest friends.

[Sonorous]

My cousin is. Formerly she & now he. And I have the same thing to say about him. We legit still accidently call him her or by his old name. But he doesn't mind. He's really fair & patient with people.

[19magic]

Most people are, if they see you trying they know it's a slipup, except the tiktok/YouTube ones it seems.

[goaded]

Everybody makes mistakes, it's assholes who do it on purpose that are the problem.

[Kabluie]

16+, many met from work, conventions, and mutual hobbies. The last one is probably the easiest because the communities are very welcoming to people of all spectrum of life, all gender identities and types of relationships. One closer friend is MtF, we started playing online together about a decade ago and still to this day, she's a teacher. My play pod a week ago i met a new friend whom is FtM. I also have several closer co-workers who are, meet more regularly in webex or in-person. I can go on but you get the idea.

[ZackBan]

One person I met at a private party once. We had a discussion so I know a name and details on life and such but we didn't hang out beyond that

[MementoMori777]

I don't think I know any and if I do, I'm clueless on it

[FunkyMonkee]

I don't know the exact number, maybe close to a dozen. I just saw another in town 3 days ago although, I suspect that was Rachel! She looked a lot like Rachel but she didn't seen to recognize me.

[BootsLover94]

Well I am trans for starters

[19magic]

Okay, so how many other trans have you met without actively searching (if you have actively searched).

[BootsLover94]

Just one and she loves fashion just like me

[19magic]

Fair enough and that's great you both share a mutual interest 😊

[AngryCarl2]

hmm, I've met tons of gay men and several lesbians but never to my knowledge anyone trans.

[LimitedBenefits101]

0 And im thankful, people I hang out with are not PRETENDERS.

[Anonymous]

I have met many female-to-male trans people, but I don't know any of them personally. I don't think I've ever met a male-to-female trans.

[Anonymous]

I’ve seen some but don’t know them, just noticed them in passing in the store or at the job during deliveries

[KatherineJ]

Personally? I know a few, and I don’t have any issues with them.

[OddBeMe]

Hit zero. But one lesbo friend doesn’t like the “she” label. Not sure if there’s middle ground. Agnostic tranny.

[Anonymous]

Three. Two of them I am not sure how honest they are about it because they don't bother playing the part and the third one actually went on hormones, instantly regretted it and gave it up.

[elontesler3]

one, joe biden. trust me, i invented the Tesler Sibertruck, SpaceseX, and i own Twatter.

[andreasderjuengere]

None. And I'm comfortable with that.

[gorydetails]

I don’t hang out with the mentally ill.

[goaded]

You are mentally ill.

[gorydetails]

@goaded that’s an embarrassing lame attempt at an insult.

[goaded]

Not nearly as good as your many times claiming I'm autistic, I'm sure. Can you admit mistakes? Do you admit that the infection fatality rate of Covid is more than 0.15%?

[gorydetails]

@goaded I told you I underestimated Fauci’s commitment to killing people. Several times. Lol, you’re claiming you’re not on the spectrum?

[goaded]

So your inability to admit error leads you to claim that the medical interventions for Covid killed more than twice as many as letting the virus rip? I told you you couldn't admit error, and that's a mental problem. Not letting people like you get away with your lies is simple free speech. You support that, don't you?

[gorydetails]

@goaded Did Fauci give AZT to aids patients which killed them? Yes or no? Did he push remdesivir? Yes or no?

[goaded]

You're a moron. You're not only not admitting error from saying only a maximum of half a million Americans could die from Covid if nobody did anything at all, you're claiming remdesivir killed as many again. Utter lunacy, or a total inability to accept facts, which amounts to the same thing.

[gorydetails]

@goaded remdesivir killed people, mislabeled deaths, leaving patients isolated, all contributed to the inflated numbers.

[goaded]

Bullshit, you just can't admit error. Like I said, you're mentally ill.

[gorydetails]

@goaded bullshit? Prove me wrong, then.

[Avicenna]

@goaded: Enough with your pathological fascination with pushing the COVID scam.

[goaded]

@Avicenna Scam?

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”?

So, what do you think Covid is? Did it not kill over a million in the US?

[Avicenna]

@goaded: It's not something that required the type of lockdowns that were carried out, especially in places like Germany and the Democrat-controlled states, ones the Democrats were happy to violate with violent protests without social distancing when it suited their political purposes. So, yeah, scam.

People who died with COVID rather than from it were counted as having died from COVID (and I wouldn't be surprised if even some people who didn't have it got miscounted by overeager COVIDians like yourself). I've seen 800k as the figure of those who actually died from COVID. But no matter the number, it wasn't necessary to force CCP-style lockdowns on everyone to the extent that was perpetrated. The focus should have been on protecting the most vulnerable rather than permamently damaging so many kids emotionally and creating permanent holes in their education.

And no one has forgotten about the heavy-handed attempts to compel people to take an experimental "vaccine" that doesn't keep people from catching COVID. Funny how so many of us managed to survive without it or its ineffective boosters.

I won't even get into the economic damage from the lockdowns or the massive fraud perpetrated in the US (estimates run as high as $1 trillion) with COVID-related funds.

[goaded]

@Avicenna You mean Germany that's had less than half the deaths per capita of the worst ten states in the US? Only Hawaii, Vermont, Utah, Alaska, and DC had lower death rates (and Germany has stupid right-wing states with higher than average death rates, as well; the other ones did better, mine).

Do you think the Democrats should have put public safety lockdowns above constitutionally protected speech (the protests)? Yes or no.

You're complaining that the Democrats followed the law.

As to vaccines: Why do some people think something's not worth doing unless it completely solves the problem? ↗

You are aware that most of the fraud was on Trump-era legislation, right?

[Avicenna]

Ah, yes, Germany. I've already mentioned the problems with the data in the US. But the real point is, at what cost?

For those who don't know, there were two lockdowns in Germany in 2020. Here's what it was like in Munich:

Police stationed on street corners in residential areas enforcing the lockdown with fire trucks circling around neighborhoods with loudspeakers blaring "Do not come outside!". At most, you could meet up with one other person during the lockdowns. Schools closed, with students forced to learn remotely. Large numbers of people didn't seek medical attention. Psychological damage from forced isolation.

Freedom of religion and assembly is also guaranteed by the US Constitution, yet churches were not afforded the same constitutional protections during the lockdowns by Democrats as BLM rioters, so you're full of shit. The main point is that the lockdowns obviously weren't necessary if the BLM riots were OK and didn't result in mass deaths. The lockdowns violated the general right of assembly, but an exception was made for riots that suited the Democrats' political purposes. So you can't trumpet the lockdowns as necessary.

"Trump-era legislation"- haha, that's funny. Spending bills originate in the House of Representatives, which was controlled by the Democrats. Once disbursed to US states, who has oversight? Certainly not the federal executive branch.

Much of the fraud occurred in California, that notorious right-wing state with a Republican supermajority in the legislature. So it obviously was Republicans who ensured that people in California prisons for rape and murder got COVID money. And that's just one example.

[goaded]

@Avicenna So, how would anyone have known that the lockdowns wouldn't work, at the time?

Germany saved something like 150,000 lives by being sensible. The US doing the same might have saved half a million Americans.

I can think of several reasons the BLM protests didn't cause mass deaths:

1. They were generally local (not like the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, where people came from all over the country to get infected and return home).
2. Many, if not most, people were wearing masks.
3. They were almost entirely outdoors.

Churches are enclosed.

I don't know what the hell you're talking about prisoners getting covid money. I'm certain it was companies and corporations that took most of the money.

[gorydetails]

And here it is. BLM riots ok, Sturgis bad, lol. SCIENCE!

[Avicenna]

@goaded: Prisoners did get it, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. I don't know if it got clawed back.

The lockdowns were obviously rash and their intent certainly wasn't noble.

You can make assumptions of "lives saved", but I don't think you've properly accounted for the damage caused by the lockdowns. Anyone can come up with an estimate.

COVID could still be spread outdoors and with masks on (we now know they are largely ineffective at preventing the spread of COVID, which is why hardly anyone wears them now). And did BLM rioters ever eat indoors, use toliets, etc? Sure they did. Protestors also got close enough to police officers to injure hundreds of them. Churches could have employed social distancing and could have met outside for much of the year.

But your argument was that there was a constitutional right to protest, which requires assembly. We now clearly see that you don't believe in this right unless you are sympathetic to the cause.

[goaded]

@gorydetails You are as much of an idiot as I thought you were if you can't see the difference between thousands of people coming together from across the nation, spending time together indoors and then going home again, and people from a local community meeting outdoors, mostly masked.

You're the one who said people should have been allowed outside, distanced. Turns out that small part of what you've said might have been right, but nobody knew it for sure at the time. Including you.

[goaded]

@Avicenna It's not that I'm not acknowledging anything, it's that I have no information. I can still confidently state that corporations and companies did most of the fraud, not prisoners.

I think numbers of dead people is a pretty good indication of how well various regions dealt with the pandemic. I'd be inclined to make allowances for when the deaths occurred (were they in the initial outbreak, after treatment protocols had been established, when the vaccine became available, or when most people had been vaccinated?). I'm not making "assumptions", I'm simply saying that 2,078 deaths per million is better than 3,492, and that the difference is about 685,000 American lives, or about 119,000 German lives (if we'd have acted like the US).

1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
"to assemble... to petition". Not "to assemble " for a party.

[gorydetails]

@goaded you’re right. I don’t have the type of sophisticated mind that thinks it’s reasonable to arrest a guy paddle boarding alone in the ocean and close the beaches but ok for people to crowd together to riot for a guy who died of a fentanyl overdose. That takes a high-level understanding of science.

I’ve never studied quantum mechanics, so I don’t understand how a virus can get you inside a restaurant but can’t get you if you put up tents with roofs and walls and claim you’re sitting “outside” where a virus can’t get you.

[goaded]

In other words, you've realised that there's a huge difference between thousands of people coming together from across the nation, spending time together indoors and then going home again, and people from a local community, mostly masked, meeting outdoors, and you want to talk about something completely unrelated rather than admit it.

[Avicenna]

@goaded: You know very well that you cannot read a constitutional provision through your own prism and decide is meaning for yourself. Note that it is the "right of the people to assemble peacefully", not solely to "assemble to petition", so once again you've attempted to distort what's inconvenient to you. And you are neither a US citizen nor have you spent any significant time here. I don't pontificate on French Constitutional Law although I can certainly read it.

And I haven't even mentioned the illegal governmental attempts at censoring commentary on COVID on social media that it didn't like. Talk about a violation of the First Amendment.

And just to make it clear for the deliberately obtuse- I am saying that both religious gathering and political protests were legally permissible during COVID for constitutional reasons. Then again, had it been up to me, the lockdowns would have been very different.

[goaded]

@Avicenna I see you've promoted that final comma to a semicolon.

1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Congress shall make no law

* respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or

* abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or

* the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It's really pretty clear.

constitution.congress.gov/.../

[gorydetails]

@goaded lol, they weren’t mostly masked and prove they were from the local community. You’re making shit up. But that’s not surprising.

[goaded]

Prove they weren't mostly masked. Why would anyone travel in the middle of a pandemic to get to a BLM protest if there were more than 7,750 BLM-linked demonstrations in over 2,240 locations throughout the United States between May 26 to August 22 2020? Of course they were local.

[gorydetails]

@goaded So kind of like parks? Whoops those were closed, too.

[LiamJHayden]

One cashier at a store in Huntington Beach.

[DarkLegacy]

None and i don't care to know any either

[AydenHazor]

I know at least a dozen

[menina]

I don't know anyone who's transgender.