Why is that the people who hate mandatory vaccines realize that they are arguing for bodily autonomy like the pro choice side is?

[Anonymous]

Or do they only care about their bodily autonomy and not women who get legal medical procedures which is not murder no matter what irrational and emotionally charged words they use like thinking calling abortion murder gives them the moral high ground.

[richardcory]

Because of the way disease spreads, your vaccine status impacts the health of other people. Even if a vaccine is not very effective, if the majority of people are vaccinated, it can prevent the spread of disease.

If you have some math background, I'd say that it can be enough to change the sign of the exponent from positive to negative in the growth curve. Otherwise Its sort of tough to describe in a short post.

Maybe think of a forest fire. A individual leaf being wet doesn't help it much but if the entire forest is damp the fire may not spread

[RagnarRedbeard]

I’m not sure, it is stupid, and you could say the same for pro-choice people who support mandatory vaccinations.

[Anonymous]

The hypocrisy escapes them. It’s forcing an agenda on someone. Then they use nonsensical arguments like fighting for the rights of the unborn (the unborn have no rights) or it’s not part of a woman’s body when a fetus clearly is until it’s able to live on its own.

[Anonymous]

Pro life people are fighting for the rights of the unborn child. People who are against the vaccine are not harming anyone. Those who have the vaccine are already protected and those who don't also chose not to.

[gorydetails]

No, they aren’t. Because a fetus isn’t the woman’s body.

[Anonymous]

It's different since vaccines don't kill babies.

[Asker]

No it isn't