Why didn't they shout "MY BODY, MY CHOICE!!!" Regarding that vaccine?
+1 yDiseases spread person to person. If on average each person infects more than 1 other person the disease expands until it has infected a large fraction of the population - as COVID did.
If each person infects less than one other person the disease dies away and infects very few people.
The early forms of covid infected 4 people for each already infected if no other actions were taken. Various pecautions, social distancing, masks etc got that down to just a little over 1. That still meant that at least 200 million americans got it an about a million died.
If most peopel have been vaccinated early, the vaccine reduces your chance of spreading the disease and that ration would have gone below 1. Very few people would have been infected.
Your vaccination status (and mask wearing) impacts other people, not just yourself. You are putting others - espeically the elderly, at risk by not being vaccinated.
10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
3.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. leftists won't even try to abolish the military draft where young men have no body autonomy and must sacrifice their bodies to die in a war
though when a war does break out, it's most likely going to be conservative men who go to fight and the more conservative men who die, the higher the population of liberals there will be surviving
00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
4Opinion
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 ySimple answer: they didn't, it is self explanatory. By definition those people are not advocates of 'my body, my choice'.
10 Reply3.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because the right people don’t stand to profit from it! The pharmaceutical companies, I am sure, made billions from Covid. Along with some of the “Experts.”
No money to be made here!00 Reply
+1 yIt wasn't just liberals, it was all the Karens and Kevins who came out of the woodwork.
00 Reply23.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Liberals are hypocrites
121 Reply- +1 y
This is what reality looks like:
www.dallasnews.com/.../
These people BY DEFINITION ARE liberals, they are advocates of the freedom to choose which is a liberal position. - +1 y
@Guffrus Yes, I would call them libertarians but I see your point. The modern definition of a liberal is not the same as a libertarian. Liberals embrace socialism and communism which eventually leads to totalitarianism. Liberals today think that global warming is real and there are 72 genders and that we need open borders and that math is racist. And if you dare to disagree with them, then you are the problem
- +1 y
I can see why you would call them libertarians, having a party refered to as liberals is certainly very unhelpful.
The definition of the word liberal has not changed outside of the US.
Liberals inside and outside of the US are not typically advocates of 'socialism and or communism' also outside of the US if you want to talk about socialism or communism you just use those terms, we don't mix and match these ideas or if 'we' do its because 'we' are being dishonest.
65% of the people in the US believe that 'climate change is a global emergency' and 70% of them believe that 'everything necessary should be being done, urgently' to deal with this problem.
A majority of people in EVERY AREA IN THE ENTIRE WORLD believe this.
Only a TINY minority of people believe that nothing should be done or it isn't real (about 5%)
I don't know why you think that climate change isn't real, to the best of my knowledge there is no reason what so ever to think that, there is no evidence supporting the position and all of the arguments that I have heard are obviously wrong.
Please show me the evidence which justifies your position on this subject.
Quote: 'there are 72 genders and that we need open borders and that math is racist' this just seems to be hateful jibberish to me, I'm not even sure I am supposed to be taking it seriously, certainly trying to argue that there should be open borders is just immediately obviously not going to be supported by evidence, it would be a complete waste of time to even bother looking something like that up.
Your thinking is clearly locked into a left right paradigm which prevents you from seeing things as they really are.
There are 2 parties in the US, BOTH OF THEM are AUTHORITARIAN CAPITALISTS, there is NOTHING even remotely close to 'socialism' or 'communism' in America and other than a handful of people no one supports those positions. - +1 y
Don't misunderstand me either, I am not suggesting that an argument from popularity is valid, I am not saying you should believe climate change is real because everyone else does, what I am saying to you is that ALL OF THE EVIDENCE PROVES THAT IS REAL and the majority of the people in the world regardless of where they come from or what language they speak etc understand that it is real.
- +1 y
www.pewresearch.org/.../
This is not cherry picked, this is literally the first 'poll' that i could find on the subject, the first ones i found were more than 15 years old, so not particularly common and easy to find it would seem.
As you will see about 70% of Americans are either fairly or very concerned about climate change.
So I don't know what you are basing your world views on but it isn't reality. - +1 y
Ok, well you picked the link so you certainly don't get to complain about the content and while the content does say that there are more Americans who are 'very concerned' about inflation and illegal immigration they are less concerned about employment than climate change and there are 4 times more people who are 'very concerned' than 'do not care at all' about climate change.
So the data that you picked yourself shows that what you say and think is wrong, you aren't even close. - +1 y
Let's get some perspective here can we?
What we are talking about is making the Earth uninhabitable for all humans, I don't think it is unreasonable to expect you to have more backing your position than a vague sense of whether something is a scam or not.
As a Republican you probably support the idea that it is ok to use deadly force in self defence, so is there a good reason why the people of the world shouldn't use lethal force to prevent you from killing everyone?
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yThey don't have working brains.
10 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Holidays
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News