Pearl Davis, what is her deal?

[MzAsh]

I’ve watched a lot of her content, and while she occasionally hints around a valid points as is a broken clock still right twice a day, it’s always ruined by her call to action for women to be pitiful, groveling simps for all the worst types of men.

Is she a misogynist? Indoctrinated by religious beliefs? The product of poor parenting? Or is she just a troll?

I was pretty convinced she was trolling for views. But the more I watch, the more I realize that we might be seeing a reflection of how she views her own self. Her hatred of any woman with an ounce of dignity or pride seems to be reflected in her own self hatred and shame for her past choices, as she constantly berates herself, her looks, over apologizing for her past, and seems to have no sense of absolution other than to hope for a miracle of traveling back in time when she was still young, pure, and sexually “valuable” to Chad and Tyrone.

I hope one day she gets a hold of herself and snaps out of this pick-me echo chamber.

https://youtu.be/vMWCWe0g4rg?si=11ZN9qTX0inc-WQs

[Metallsturm]

She isn't right twice a day; she's wrong twice a day.

If you'd watch her content and think critically (and not emotionally), you'd realize that she is highlighting a significant disconnect between what women want and what women offer nowadays -- for example, a lot of women wanting a traditionally masculine man to treat them like princesses, while retaining their rights to behave like a modern woman who constantly advertises herself as "up for grabs" AS WELL as acting akin she is an equal to a man -- despite wanting being treated like a princess and describing a man that is superior to a woman in every regard -- while providing nothing of a value that *men* value in women, not what women project that men want.

She also highlights unfair laws/practices towards men that are commonplace and even celebrated to an extent, while the mainstream narrative is that women are somehow also oppressed at the same time.

She highlights events that mainstream media simply won't cover, like women's protest in Iceland: Iceland has a total population of ~370,000 people, nearly 100,000 women went on strike for some "gender inequality" nonsense in one of the most egalitarian societies... And nothing happened. I mean, the economy didn't felt the strike at all. Think about it: a quarter of the population (regardless of age) went on strike, which could be roughly half of the entire workforce, and nothing happened. What does it tell you? That women hold jobs that are meaningless to a society over there. No complaints were filed at the HR on that day.

And a fundamental mistake you make is thinking that she, as well as the rest of the red pill, are hating women. None of them do. Some unpleasant facts about women are highlighted and since society and media caters to women so much, women nowadays grow up legitimately thinking they can do no wrong, akin to Joffrey Baratheon from Game of Thrones. So when women get criticized, or their inadequacies get highlighted, or they're simply questioned on their doublethink, they dunno how to respond, and resort to a default reaction -- emotions.

Just because you criticize, question or highlight delusions of someone, doublethink, double standards and/or mindset, it doesn't necessarily mean that you hate someone.

[MzAsh]

I don’t think Pearl, or the red pill, hates women. I do however believe they don’t respect women and want to keep women submissive and inferior.

I also recognize that Pearl has made some valid points, but she overshadows them with her advocacy that women shouldn’t vote and should endure abuse and sharing unfaithful men.

[MzAsh]

But again, I think this is based more on a reflection of how poorly she views herself and has adopted a beggars mentality when it comes to relationship dynamics.

[Metallsturm]

Inferior? We're different, thus comparing men to women is akin to comparing apples and oranges. The issue is that a lot of women nowadays reject their nature, due to the influence of feminism, and judge themselves from a male metric, where they *are* in fact inferior (hence why earlier I said that they want a man who is superior to them in every regard, as now women falsely think they're the same as men, yet paradoxically want to keep all the privileges of women; in short, they cherry-pick when they want to be equals and when they want to be ladies). If women valued themselves on female metric, there wouldn't be an issue.

As for submission; that is overwhelmingly what men want. Women, if you peel back all the layers of womanese and translate it into a comprehensible language, whenever they evaluate a man for potential relations, they think "how is he going to make my life better?". Men, when we evaluate a girl for relations (not just for sex, as we can date your gender solely for sex with ease, knowing full well from day one we'll never commit and eventually will replace you), we think "is she going to make my life worse?". See the difference?
Both of these mindsets require one share thing: submission. If a girl is bossy, loud, obnoxious, too ambitious etc., she will be a headache, making life worse. If a girl is too combative, argumentative, non-compliant etc., she will refuse to be led to a better future by someone who is way more rational & logical than her.

[Metallsturm]

So after watching some of her streams and videos for a few months, I can say she doesn't really view herself poorly; simply unlike most women, she can admit her flaws and privileges, something that makes other women uncomfortable, as the narrative that women can do no wrong is extremely strong nowadays. Hell, remember "MeToo" & "BelieveAllWomen" movement and how big it got? Well, sure didn't work well with Johnny Depp, didn't it? Besides, the phrase "believe all women" implies that they can't lie out of spite and whatnot, yet women aren't even honest with each other, telling each other even as best girlfriends comforting lies all the time; yet somehow it should be accepted when a woman is either spiteful or angry towards a man.

So in a sense she is calling out modern women, mainstream media and feminism in general of raising a generation of female Joffreys Baratheons, and the consequences of it are going to be disastrous long-term. Keep in mind, she isn't doing it randomly, nor pulls it out of her ass: she uses government stats, verified and peer-reviewed researches from reliable groups (such as Pew and many others) etc.

Brian from Whatever Podcast was even attacked in mainstream media, claiming he makes women look dumb on his podcast. Yet all he does is asking a simple question very politely, and then 99% of women respond with utter stupidity. Yet, the mainstream narrative is that it's Brian who is at fault for women sounding stupid.

See the problem and catering? Think such a generation of women are capable of someone criticizing them?

[MzAsh]

Men and women have differences, and we each have our own strengths, but that doesn’t mean either are inferior as a gender. Pearl and others in here sphere advocates for way too much disrespect towards women and way too much pandering and control to men. Our nature as women doesn’t look like ‘the help’ as they paint it out to be. We have goals, ambitions, a social life, and we want independence and freedom, and autonomy and influence in the world as powerful beings, and that’s our nature. Pearls advocates for female disempowerment in so many ways, it’s ridiculous. Even her own followers are starting to be like wtf are you smoking lady.

Men might want submission, but they simply don’t deserve it. When they have it, they f it up. It takes a man with a lot of money, a lot of loyalty, a lot of humility, and above all, a lot of service mentality to maintain leadership properly. If you’re not leading with service, then you’re not going to lead. Too many women have already learned, myself included, that being submissive doesn’t get you anywhere good, most of the time.

[MzAsh]

And I say this as a happily married woman if 16 years. A relationship coach myself. As someone’s who’s been watching Pearl for a couple years, and someone who’s kept an eye on the manosphere since 2011. So you can’t tell me any news I’m going to find out by watching their content, because believe me, I’m highly aware and have been for a very long time.

[Billlewis]

Oh my goodness... I've read dozens upon dozens of your comments today, and it's obvious that not only are you never wrong, you know how to sum up the topic of discussion in a meticulously accurate manner. I think I'm going to be your number one fan, if that's alright, of course;)

[Miristheiss]

I immediately turn off when some fool throws out misogyny.

Does anyone even know what that means? You obviously don't. You've just heard endless people parrot that word so you do too.

I personally loathe the hook up, sleep around, Onlyfans sex work, whorish nature of modern women. Nasty.

Too bad your sensitive ears cannot handle 1 woman out of 4 billion calling it out. Heaven forbid some classy, traditional women with some morals actually grow up in this wasteland generation.

But for people like you even one voice calling out how nasty it is and pushing back on it today's values being good, normal and desired behaviors is one voice too many.

Every voice must be the narrative, career is king, your 20's should be school, master's program, drinking, partying, living it up, sleeping around as much as you want with as many as you want, sexually empowered by doing Onlyfans and putting permanent images and videos of yourself sexually on the internet forever, get tattoos, piercings, men are scum, you don't need a man, families, kids that is oppression, that leads to misery, go be loud, proud, dress how you want, drink all you want, screw as much as you want... no consequences, this is the path to joy, happiness and fulfillment.

How dare anyone dare push back against that narrative. Apparently it is too much for you. It triggers you. What? More than one point of view? SACRILEGE! Rabid feminism is the only view we are supposed to ever hear!!!

[MzAsh]

I never actually called her a misogynist if you actually read what I wrote. Pearl isn’t classy or traditional. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Like, at all? Don’t comment again until you can make sense.

[wiltingrosepetal]

Oh I've watched several video essays on her psychology, I can't see her as anything but a sorry sight anymore.

She's desperate for love, she really, really wants a boyfriend, but no guy wants her. The only actual partner she's had catfished her. So she dived into the manosphere looking for tips on dating, and she realised that a mid twenties, nonvirginal woman who-according to their attractiveness rating scale- is a four, has very low chances of dating due to their misogynistic standards. Now that all her insecurities had been validated, she figured that the only way to get a man was to pretend to be exactly what they wanted. So she hated women, dressed like a trad wife, and voiced every one of their views.

Everything she says and does comes from her insecurities and need for male attention. It's really... really sad

[jennifer_bloom]

I would say she is ugly and uneducated and thinks pretending to support misogyny will make her attractive to men that would usually choose a more intelligent and attractive women to be their bride. She thinks she can replace being a good person with being an agreeable one, not knowing that only abusers would date her.

[MzAsh]

I think she could be a lot more attractive with some effort. But I know spent my teens and early 20s being submissive and agreeable and it didn’t benefit me any. Abusers do love naive and agreeable girls.

[Lionman95]

Her deal is that there's obviously a problem in the dating world. Many people are disappointed through dating so Pearl tries to make money out of the attention she gets. I don't think it's a religious question she rather understands that she can make money pointing at female mistakes at dating because many guys listening to it and through sponsors. Her whole channel is created to generate attention. I don't think it's poor parenting because I would say it's just a slightly Conservative worldview in terms of values.

[MzAsh]

She doesn’t seem to understand, or maybe she just doesn’t care, that her ideas for solutions will only make dating and relationships much worse.

[Lionman95]

Maybe but we live in a world where many people make money without skills. She's an influencer and it's all about attention. I don't think she's dumb and only does as much as she has to do. It's like the whatever podcast they also just talk.

[ShadezMcgee]

You know, rather than lambasting her and criticizing her views, why don't you interview her and talk about this where she can in turn give you a debate and discussion?

Furthermore, do you feel this way towards any women that advocate for men amd embrace femininity? Genuinely curious Ash, because this comes across as hostile to read.

[ChefPapiChulo]

“ debate and discussion?”

That would not end well. Maybe if it was mud wrestling.

[MzAsh]

I’ve reached out before, but she avoided discussing in depth because she can’t make an example out of me. I’m the image of a woman who, by red pill principles, should be single with cats and on an assorted cocktail of ssri medication. Instead I’m happily married even though I’ve broken many of the rules she claims women should abide by.

[Amuere]

Pearl can't debate, she's an idiot. She has no positions of her own, she parrots the usual moronic RP tenets.

[ShadezMcgee]

@MzAsh never heard of her until you mentioned her. This would be the second time you said her name to my knowledge.

Regardless, thank you for answering that part. However, you didn't answer the other part of my question. Women dating coaches that advocate and help men when it comes to dating or tell women about embracing femininity. Do you have issues with any of them? You also haven't minced words about some women that Passport Bros go and find in place of women here. There are videos of these women that call out the very women that judge them.

I find it interesting that women crap on them when you think there would be a level of support and love for them even though they aren't considered western women. For women that say they use men for visas, aren't educated, are only going to leech off them. Those are bold words to say when a lot of these women are in fact far from that.

[MzAsh]

I was actually just coming back to answer your second part. I support anyone who aims to help men and women have happy, healthy, long lasting relationships, provided that’s what they’re actually doing. However, I see a narrative being built around male dominant relationships and female submission branded as femininity and that’s not what femininity is. Coaches like Sarah Dawn Moore sometimes have good things to say, but she also misses the mark a lot and doesn’t advocate enough for men to get a hold of their anger, resentment, and entitlement to a perfect wife. Coaches like her don’t seem to understand that modern women have left traditionalism because it didn’t serve them properly. They don’t seem to understand that a man’s value isn’t in his money or muscles, or how well he makes decisions either.

[ShadezMcgee]

Never heard of Sarah Dawn Moore. The only woman coach I considered was a good one was Apollonia Ponti since she makes good points on both men and women and her content reminded me of the only other male coach I would recommend for men.

Traditionalist serves different women, not all. I see women that are non traditionalist exactly like I explained in the MyTake I wrote regarding relationships and modern dating differences between men and women. I don't hear a lot of these women on TikTok with that militant and extreme masculine mindset of "I don't need a man" ever say what they contribute. You only hear what they want a man to have, but you never hear what they bring to a relationship to make a partner happy. They see materialistic things that they personally value as the qualities they bring, but not what they can do to make a man happy.

Men bend over backwards just to be seen by a woman these days only to be turned down because they aren't good enough in the eyes of many.

So if a man's value isn't in his muscles, money or how well he makes decisions, what is it then Ash?

[MzAsh]

I’ll have to check out this Apollonia. I may have seen her content before but don’t recognize her by name.
For most modern women looking for a good husband, his value is going to be in his ability/willingness to stay loyal, commitment to growing together, collaborate as a team through life, and support and assist her in her life endeavors. Someone who knows marriage is an ongoing effort, and it also takes ongoing effort to keep the romance and magic alive and he’s willing to keep doing his part. A good father figure for those who want kids.

[MzAsh]

But to your point, I definitely agree that women should bring value as well. They should have that mentally prepared before they get into a serious relationship. Things may change too. But still, relationships aren’t to be one sided.

[ShadezMcgee]

I agree with the loyalty, commitment to grow and collaborate as a team, but support and assist? Explain that part please. What do you mean by support and assist? This should only fall in place if she is doing the same for him on those points you mentioned. From what I have seen on questions you have asked or stated in a MyTake, you seem to focus on men jumping over the moon first for a woman before she even entertains he is worth her time.

Marriage does take two to contribute and and build it and maintain it. Women should bring value, but the question I would like you to answer is what do you believe that value women should bring is. Because like I said, I believe a lot of women misunderstand the value of what they think men want versus what they truly want.

Also. Do you believe that if a woman is married that she should always keep her eyes open for men that are better?

[ChefPapiChulo]

Watching 2 people who lack a simple education is not fun.

[Vegasrunner]

@MzAsh It would be interesting to have you on her platform. In a situation where you would be forced to articulate your POV sicinctly in a condensed period of time w/out the benifit of being able to bully or shame my hypothesis is like most women who go on these platforms you would be made am example of and the audience would recognize your obvious hypocrisy, that you would be unable to defend.

[MzAsh]

Shadez, by support and assist, I’m talking about taking the initiative to look for ways to help make life or work easier for your partner.

For example, i don’t always have time to keep the house clean, so he’ll do house cleaning tasks throughout the day. He has great organizational skills so he’ll keep my home office neat and organized, or my bathroom necessities organized.

He also has great photography skills so I’ll have him take brand photos for my work, or other photos I want to put on social media, etc.

And I’ll do the same in-kind for him, like I’ve helped him put together an attractive resume or crush it in interviews, or if I’m on my way home and he needs his laptop picked up from the repair shop, I’ll swing by and get it so he doesn’t have to make a trip there.

“you seem to focus on men jumping over the moon first for a woman before she even entertains he is worth her time.”

This likely because women generally have many options of interested men to choose from. There are a lot guys just trying to get in her pants, and there are many other guys who will only prove to be a headache, so she needs to know she’s going to be getting the best option with someone who is properly invested.

“what do you believe that value women should bring is.”

First she needs to ask herself what value she naturally feels most compelled to bring. For example, I’ve always been ambitious and career oriented vs being a stay at home wife/mom. So it’s important for me to choose a man who appreciated and supported a career wife. It wouldn’t make sense for me to choose a man who deeply wanted a housewife.

“Do you believe that if a woman is married that she should always keep her eyes open for men that are better?”

No. If she’s married then she made a commitment and needs the honor that. The exception would be if he were breaking the honor by cheating or being abusive then she might need to exit the marriage if he’s not willing to cooperate in getting help.

[MzAsh]

The 2nd part on value, Shadez, is that she needs to consider what type of man she wants… and what value he prefers of his wife, and do those things align? I think for a lot of women, there’s a gap between fantasy and reality and what I see most commonly is women who think being a SAHM will be like vs what it’s really like. I see a lot of women who quickly reality how difficult and now almost impossible it is to raise a child and support a family on one average American income. So then they’re suddenly finding themselves having to contribute financially when that’s never what they wanted to do.

I think it’s important for women to study their preferences, them study the lifestyle of others and the value each partner brings and figure out where they’re going to fit in and what type of man they need to look for to collaborate and make their vision a reality.

[Anonymous]

I've seen her. She's right about a lot of things but I do believe she's as inflammatory as possible to get views and for clickbait. It's how she makes her money. I mean she deliberately invites panels of onlyfans girls, high maintainence women, gold diggers, crazy feminists etc for this reason.

[WhiteBoyChill]

About what I expected. Lol

[Opinion Owner]

@WhiteBoyChill you have to admitt when she brings on all those kind of toxic women , some of whom are clearly delusional or crazy she is stacking the deck.

[MzAsh]

She’s one of them though. Fresh and fit mine the streets for drunk, club hopping teenagers who are still living at home and have their existence paid for by someone else, and they go “look everyone, this is what woman are like.” No homie.

[Opinion Owner]

Whatever she's doing, she is making a fortune selling controversy.

[Anemone978]

She is upset she isn't conventionally attractive so she spews her crap to loser men who will support her views.. really she is just chasing clout and popularity because it has been proven already she doesn't believe in anything she herself says..

[Amuere]

She a rich daddy's girl who takes advantage of desperate men (the Redpill/Manosphere simps) and doesn't even live up you the garbage she speaks on a daily, she's almost 30 (oh no the wall is approaching!!!) and she isn't married yet, nor has she served as a breeder for an "alpha male" yet.

Also... why is she even giving opinion? According to those people as a woman she's too dumb to even be talking 😆

[MzAsh]

Yep. Women shouldn’t vote or influence society, yet she speaks as if we should listen to her for some reason.

[Starrrboy]

She's just another pick me in the manosphere making business because , you gotta take advantage of those idiots 😂... funny she still hasn't pulled a " high value " man yet despite Worshipping men all day lol.. but that's very understandable when she looks like a hag 🤣..

[Joshydavid25]

Her channel blew up quickly, she's getting attention, she's making more money. She makes a lot of good points, but she taints them with some of her more extreme views.. I think that she truly does appreciate men in a way a lot of women don't today.. But she is doing what she thinks we would like to hear.. Maybe she thinks going the opposite of the extreme feminism seen today, is the way to go..

[Grond21]

It is sad to watch. But I don't think she is faking it. I think she is craving the fame she got when she first came on to the scene. Then she was often right in her diagnosis of the problem. So tons of people followed her. Now she is chasing that feeling, going deeper and deeper into "uncharted" territory to find that social response again

[Chewy______]

Well once you make T-shirts saying " Women Shouldn't Vote" then you're not to be taken seriously. You're either an internet shock jock or a fucking idiot.

[NathanDavis]

her deal... is one I, fortunately ever ever had to deal with it

same goes for all other nonsense influencers alike...

[Vegasrunner]

She does a terrific job of highlighting incongruency between female words and actions. Women are not used to other women divulging female truths so it rubs them the wrong way, plus because she's female she takes away the typical female shaming tactics.

[JesseP1nk]

There are some thing i agree with her and some thing i dont. She has right for her own opinion as much as YOU. But, obviosly it is your own life and you make decisions what you like. She gives you just different perspective so later you can't tell noone did not tell you what might happen.

[MzAsh]

I’m all for everyone having the right to an opinion, but I think that’s an oversimplification of what she’s doing. She’s supporting and trying to further a toxic narrative that disrespects women.

[ProbablyClueless]

She's pretty much a brain-dead pick me. Which is a shame, because I do think she has the capacity to make intelligent arguments. She just doesn't do it because she hasn't put in the leg work to really understand men's issues.

[DaisyM23]

i think there's a lot of internal issues going on with her probably, she does make some valid points but for the most part it's mostly BS about women coming out of her mouth

[TheUniqueOne96]

I haven't seen a lot of her content, but from what I've seen, she simply calls out women on their delusion and bullshit, something that others need to start taking notes from and implementing.

[Apple1996]

She's not attractive so she has to agree with red pill misogynists just to get some attention

[RealMarek]

Imagine spreading this message during a time when 1/3 of men in their 20s can’t even find a girlfriend and men’s real income has stagnated since 1970. $$$$$$

[loveslongnails]

I had no clue who she is, and after seeing that video, I'm glad I didn't. I'll never get those 5 minutes of my life back, or my devastated brain cells. LOL

[CALIGVLA]

I'm pretty sure she's farming money off desperate guys.

[ChefPapiChulo]

If she opened up an onlyfans and made millions, would she be more respectable to you?

[MzAsh]

She’d at least be bringing an income…something to serve herself… instead of giving her dignity away for free like she currently does.

[ChefPapiChulo]

An okay. I’m not gonna go through the trouble of trying to understand that one. I learned my lesson last time speaking with you lol.

[BoopBoopBeep]

She's got millions of subscribers how is she not making money? Most women on OF make like $20/month, I'm sure she's beating that.

[ChefPapiChulo]

@BoopBoopBeep don’t try using reason. The OP is just testing her bait skills for her outrage writing.

[BoopBoopBeep]

@chefpapichulo
haha yeah I think you're right... oh wait i just advanced the patriarchy... or... something

[MzAsh]

I’m sure she’s making some money but it’s not millions.

[ChefPapiChulo]

Lol what.

So if she was making millions you’d respect her then?

[MzAsh]

Oh ffs. 🤦🏻‍♀️ In case there’s any further confusion. I respect an OF creator WAY more than I respect what Pearl is doing.

[ChefPapiChulo]

you seem inconsistent on basically everything.

[ChefPapiChulo]

i should probably not say anything, since you would take this as engagement. no one should engage in anything you say.

[sirderpsalot123]

She's just a grifter. She doesn't practice what she preaches and is 100% in it for the money.

[WhiteBoyChill]

I honestly don’t give a f^ck who she is to be honest

[strateguy632]

trying to get clicks

[gorydetails]

Internet drama is so pointless.

[BarryLiverstone]

She gets clicks