Do you consider President Donald Trump to be a criminal?

[SolitarySolace]

Yes, Trump is a criminal

No, Trump is not a criminal. He was never convicted of anything.

[Emii_Urashima]

I am sure that no billionaire is completely clean. He has likely broken laws that we are not aware of. I am not an American and therefore not taking sides in the insane political drama going on there, but I think the woke progressive socialists are the real criminals. They control the courts, the Justice Department, FBI, & CIA. The New York case against former President Trump was decided before it began. The unusual law that they used against him is a local state law that no other state has. It is the only time in the history of the country that a person had been fined for defrauding banks when there isn't a victim and the banks were happy and were paid. If Trump loses on appeal, then he will have to pay the money to the state, since there wasn't any victims in the fraud case. Does that make sense? I also followed the E. Jean Carroll "rape" case. Most people dont know why it was only a civil case. Apparently, in a civil case, the accuser doesn't need to provide any evidence. That should scare the hell out of any American man. She couldn't remember the year it happened. Years later, she showed off the dress she was wearing during the alleged assult. Then, the designer of the dress claimed that she didn't design it until 7 years after the incident supposedly happened. Then we discover that this woman has been making crazy posts on social media for years. She wrote about finding rape sexy and about having rape fantasies. She wrote that she takes sex tips from her dog. Then we discover that her entire story about Trump came from an episode of her favorite TV show, Law & Order. The judge it the case would not allow any of that to be mentioned in court. Perhaps I don't understand your courts, but it looks like if you are accused of a crime, you are out of luck if you are shown to have support for the wrong political party. The media will cover it up, because it is also controlled by the far left party. I just read an article that shows almost 97% of all American journalists belong to that political party. You Americans need to take time to read about German history from 1930-1939 and you will see where you are heading. I absolutely expect to one day read that the Democrat party in the USA has banned all opposition parties and suspended elections. The day is coming.

[DeeDeeDeVour]

No.

He's "innocent" until proven guilty.

[SolitarySolace]

Not according to democrats, liberals, leftists and the majority of women

[exitseven]

Nope, he is being singled out by a crooked DOJ because he is going to beat Joe The Big Guy Biden in a landslide the only way democrats can win is to cheat.

[supercutebutt]

LOL!

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[Sabretooth]

that man has been breaking laws since 1973 where he was accused by the Justice Department of violations of the Fair Housing Act in the operation of 39 buildings. en.wikipedia.org/.../Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

[exitseven]

It is laws like that , that caused the banking crisis in the 90s. Property owners should have the right to determine who they rent to. Every apartment I ever rented wanted references and I always had to show W2 forms and other information so the landlord could see that i would be able to pay rent. Trump plays rough but the world is a rough place. I had an uncle whonowned some buildings in the Bronx. He was always getting sued by somebody. I think it is just how things are done.

[supercutebutt]

Would you be OK if Trump roughly grabbed your wife and daughter's vulvae?

[Sabretooth]

@supercutebutt he'd probably be honored.

[exitseven]

@supercutebutt it all boils down to that with you. Maybe you are projecting?

[supercutebutt]

Projecting. LOL! Trump grabs pussy but it's somehow MY fault. OK, dude.

[exitseven]

@supercutebutt I am to much of a gentleman to reply to this.

[supercutebutt]

@exitseven Donald Trump is your Lord & Savior.

[tfan1]

He’s trying to save the country and possibly the world. Bonehead biden and oBlahma are hell bent on destroying the country.

[Sabretooth]

Trump: The economy lost 2.9 million jobs. The unemployment rate increased by 1.6 percentage points to 6.3%.
Paychecks grew faster than inflation. Average weekly earnings for all workers were up 8.7% after inflation.
After-tax corporate profits went up, and the stock market set new records. The S&P 500 index rose 67.8%.
The international trade deficit Trump promised to reduce went up. The U. S. trade deficit in goods and services in 2020 was the highest since 2008 and increased 40.5% from 2016.
The number of people lacking health insurance rose by 3 million.
The federal debt held by the public went up, from $14.4 trillion to $21.6 trillion.
Home prices rose 27.5%, and the homeownership rate increased 2.1 percentage points to 65.8%.
Illegal immigration increased. Apprehensions at the Southwest border rose 14.7% last year compared with 2016.
Coal production declined 26.5%, and coal-mining jobs dropped by 16.7%. Carbon emissions from energy consumption dropped 11.5%.
Handgun production rose 12.5% last year compared with 2016, setting a new record.
The murder rate last year rose to the highest level since 1997.
Trump filled one-third of the Supreme Court, nearly 30% of the appellate court seats and a quarter of District Court seats.

[Sabretooth]

Biden: The economy added 13.9 million jobs, putting the total 4.5 million higher than before the pandemic.
The unemployment rate dropped for a time to the lowest in nearly 54 years; unfilled job openings surged, with 3 jobs for every 2 unemployed job seekers.
Inflation surged to the highest level in over 40 years. Despite slowing their rise lately, consumer prices are up nearly 17.1% overall. Gasoline is up 50.3%.
Average weekly earnings haven’t kept pace with prices. After adjusting for inflation, “real” weekly earnings dropped 3.9%.
The U. S. murder rate declined by one-half of a point.
Defying economists who have been predicting a recession for more than a year, the economy expanded at an annual rate of 2.2% in the first quarter and 2.1% in the second quarter.
After-tax corporate profits increased in the second quarter of this year — the first increase in a year.
Inflation-adjusted median household income went down by 2.7%. The official poverty rate is the same as the year before he took office.
Those lacking health insurance went down — by 0.7 percentage points by one measure and 1.3 points by another.
U. S. crude oil production is up 10.7%; imports are up 7.4%.
Homeownership rates have barely budged under Biden.
The U. S. accepted 60,014 refugees in fiscal year 2023 — the highest amount in seven years, but less than half of Biden’s campaign goal of admitting up to 125,000.
The number of apprehensions of those trying to cross the southern border illegally crept back up in recent months, and is up 300% overall.
Debt held by the public has increased by 22.5%.
The trade deficit for goods and services has gone up by 24.6%.

[tfan1]

@Sabretooth - Well we definitely know what side you are on. The demonic rat left.

[Sabretooth]

Nah. I just live in reality. You wanna believe that Trump was God's gift to the country. I'd like to believe that I'm a trillionaire... But...

[PetLover24]

@Sabretooth I consider Biden a pedophile, sexual predator, & criminal of the state to highest degree.

He's been on NATIONAL TV & VERY inappropriately touching & sniffing young girls & women's hair... others be ARRESTED for... but gets away with it as he's "president".

Worse his family is just yuk. You'd think a welfare trailer trash family, not representing the country. Son's a crackhead. Daughter likely was sexually abused as kid & ended up being more promiscuous than a well used passed-around-the-whole-city prostitute.

.

Further he supports illegals who nobody pays taxes on so country is not making any money, not to mention can't be easily tracked so an illegal immigrant could go across America five times raping & murdering dozens of people & still go luck finding them.
www.foxnews.com/.../biden-allows-epic-flood-illegals-heres-reason

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/.../paxton-issues-statement-catastrophic-illegal-immigration-surge-orchestrated-biden-administration .

He supports criminal activities - the left has done little to nothing to tamper petty crime, major crimes, drug abuse, etc. and instead has relaxed laws so that even serious criminals are finding themselves released earlier than was originally mandiated.
www.usatoday.com/.../

They rebuked Trump's COVID-19 assistance program ideology and made other changes which has resulted in an ALL TIME HIGH homelessness in America.

thehill.com/.../

And much more.

[Sabretooth]

@PetLover24 Trump has also shown to have a sexual attraction to children going back years. Trump's mother and wife were both illegal immigrants and he and his family has hired immigrants. Biden has also been tougher on immigration: www.washingtonpost.com/.../ not to mention that Trump had the boarder deal killed. Trump's son has the mannerisms of a crackhead. Most crimes happen in red states: www.thirdway.org/.../the-two-decade-red-state-murder-problem and Trump even bragged about doing nothing.

[PetLover24]

I consider Biden a pedophile, sexual predator, & criminal of the state to highest degree.

He's been on NATIONAL TV & VERY inappropriately touching & sniffing young girls & women's hair... others be ARRESTED for... but gets away with it as he's "president".

Worse his family is just yuk. You'd think a welfare trailer trash family, not representing the country. Son's a crackhead. Daughter likely was sexually abused as kid & ended up being more promiscuous than a well used passed-around-the-whole-city prostitute.

.

Further he supports illegals who nobody pays taxes on so country is not making any money, not to mention can't be easily tracked so an illegal immigrant could go across America five times raping & murdering dozens of people & still go luck finding them.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-allows-epic-flood-illegals-heres-reason

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-issues-statement-catastrophic-illegal-immigration-surge-orchestrated-biden-administration .

He supports criminal activities - the left has done little to nothing to tamper petty crime, major crimes, drug abuse, etc. and instead has relaxed laws so that even serious criminals are finding themselves released earlier than was originally mandiated.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/policing/2021/05/01/biden-administration-needs-walk-walk-second-chances-inmates/4892957001/

They rebuked Trump's COVID-19 assistance program ideology and made other changes which has resulted in an ALL TIME HIGH homelessness in America.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4363103-homelessness-sours-highest-recorded-level/#:~:text=Homelessness%20in%20the%20United%20States,according%20to%20the%20Biden%20administration.

And much more.

[goaded]

Yes, absolutely.

If I were on a jury, I would dispassionately consider the evidence presented, but I'm not.

I can confidently say he definitely took all those documents, and kept them, and hid them, and lied to the authorities about them.

He also interfered in the Georgia election when he made that phone call we all heard, while his people had a plan to put forward fake electors (yes, the lawyer who suggested the idea literally called them "fake") so that oath-breaking Republicans in Congress could more easily lie about the election and fraudulently choose him over Biden.

He also probably falsified business records to cover up his election finance crimes that Cohen already went to prison for. That will be the first case to come to trial.

An innocent man would have wanted the trials to start as soon as possible, to prove his innocence. Trump's being delaying them (with the obvious help in Florida of a judge he appointed) for months, if not years.

I've missed one of the trials, haven't I? Which one was that?

[goaded]

Oh, yeah, the big federal case: conspiring to defraud the government and disenfranchise voters, and corruptly obstructing an official proceeding. Jan 6 and all the lies and dirty tricks to try and steal the presidency. How could I forget?

[Dargil]

I consider Trump a political target just like Russia and China do to their people.
False allegations paid for by Democrats, Kangaroo courts, corrupted election authorities, bribed, paid informants and coached creators of crimes.

The entire Leftist consensus fears what Trump will do if he is elected. They are already attempting to put land mines in place to cripple his coming administration. They will stop at nothing to block him, including attempting to assassinate him, especially between the election and inauguration.

One lesson to be accepted is that whatever they accuse Trump and Republicans of doing, they are already doing. One example is the ongoing accusation of "racism" where there is simply no history to back it up.

Trump is the only rampart between dissolution of the USA and its survival and even then, civil war may be inevitable.

G0d help us.

[SolitarySolace]

The democrats would be the only ones who would benefit from a civil war. I mean they want this country to destroy itself so that they can rebuild it in their own image where women are the majority leaders for example

[exitseven]

Yes, every time some phony balcony indictment comes down, Trump goes up in the polls. I have not seen any recent polls but I bet he has a commanding lead. The liberals don't know what to do. I am afraid they will have him killed.

[Anonymous]

No more than most politicians. That said technically every single American is a criminal under just federal laws, which all of us violate on average 3 a day.

It is only by mere executive discretion and inability to uniformly enforce that we are not so persecuted. Which of course creates a very toxic and easily abused legal system.

Constitutionally speaking The feds are not suppose to have almost any domestic laws, and nobody not Feds nor States are suppose to enforce laws they don't or can't apply uniformly.
Unfortunately there is no modern means to enforce that constitution apart from the interest of the hand picked politicians who benefit from its abuse. So that doesn't mean much anymore.

[goaded]

"Constitutionally speaking The feds are not suppose to have almost any domestic laws"
Over 200 years of Supreme Court precedent disagrees with you. Starting with a Chief Justice who fought in the revolutionary war and served as Secretary of State under John Adams.

What three federal laws did you break today? How do they compare to campaign finance fraud and falsifying documentation to cover it up? Stealing and concealing government documents? Conspiring to steal the presidency from the winner of an election?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded I said almost any not all. Timothy Pickering was never a judge must less a federal supreme court Chief judge. That said I wouldn't say federal judges including those appointed by the Federalist were necessary loyal to the written law. They rubber stamped more than a few clear abuses of their appointers.

Part of the problem with the federal legal code is it is soo vague and broad not even the enforcers know what is and is not in violation much-less anyone else. Still with a computer and a little creativity its not hard to show anyone guilty of something 3 different things every day.

Here are just a few examples of people who inadvertently ended up going to jail for violating such laws:
www.mic.com/.../8-ways-we-regularly-commit-felonies-without-realizing-it

[goaded]

Are you suggesting I said something wrong? John Marshall took over from Pickering as SoS under Adams and was Chief Justice when the constitution was clarified to allow the federal government to make laws that aren't expressly forbidden.

I've never in my life done any of those 8 things that could be seen as unreasonable, and that's a far cry from three federal crimes a day by anyone.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Given John Marshall, a partisan Federalist politician, was not a particularly honest judge, i'm quite sure you could find a few example where he rubber stamped policies he liked just like the current court does.
There is a reason contrary to perhaps what many judges self-serving opinion might suggest. The court is NOT the only authority on the constitution anymore than any other branch is. This a fact John Marshal confronted in his first major case Marbury v. Madison (1803).

To that end I'm not sure what if any point your trying to make in bring in his opinion.

Being German i imagine it would be difficult for you to violate a federal law outside of theses untied states. Although quite easy inside if you ever visited and for example didn't have your passport with you.

[goaded]

The simple point I'm making is that you're making nonsense claims.

"Three federal crimes a day" is nonsense. The idea that the federal government shouldn't be allowed to pass laws is nonsense that was rejected while the founding fathers were still around.

Marbury v. Madison established the right of the courts to determine the constitutionality of the actions of the other two branches of government. You like that, don't you?

Then, there was McCulloch v. Maryland
"Let the end be legitimate," Marshall wrote, "let it be within the scope of the Constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited but consist with the letter and the spirit of the Constitution, are constitutional."

In other words, if a law's not explicitly unconstitutional, it's constitutional.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded The Federal goverment is allowed to pass laws just in the specific domain explicit provided to them by the Federal Government. For everything else we have State & local governments. The 10th Amendment was ratified to remind them of that fact. Our States created a federal Constitutional system designed to serve very specific proposes in protecting them from other states in specific ways. They left everything else to themselves while retaining the means to do so.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) didn't determine anything, the court simply declared as it had before that they had a co-equal power to decide something was unconstitutional and within their respective role refuse to cooperate in enforcing. This is important because it demonstrates a situation where the court lacked the power to do what the court thought was Constitutional without the cooperation of anther branch, and as such Marbury never got his writ.

As such clearly the federal court like very other oath taking part of the goverment has the right to decide constitutionality but only insofar as to choose what they are willing to enforce not to compel obedience by the other branches or levels of goverment. Therefore not the Only word on said constitution.

McCulloch v. Maryland is an example of where a federal court rubber stamping the actions of the federal executive and congress which hand picked them. One of the critical conflicts of interest undermining of our constitutionality system, in this case by enabling the federal goverment to maintain the enumerated "national bank"
The Federal Constitution does not allow it and indeed the issue was debated and rejected during the convention. The bank nonetheless represents a very corrupting power of federal politicians that they claimed indispensable. Like many other Hamilton claims this was proven a lie eventually when Constitutional Federal politicians were finally in office at the right time to let the banks very long charter expire.

[goaded]

The 10th Amendment was passed before the SCOTUS cases we've been talking about; the people involved were around for both the revolutionary war, the founding documents, and those cases. You seem to be suggesting they didn't know what they were talking about and you know better what they intended.

They may not be the "only" word, a claim I never made, but they are the final word.

(Oh, FYI, Germany is a Federal Republic, too. I suppose I could commit a federal crime by making a Hitler salute without being in a play or film, but it's not he sort of thing I would do every day. What three federal crimes did you commit in the US yesterday?)

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded I am not implying they didn't know what they were talking about I'm saying they didn't have a motivation to care.

Although this failing is expected, the systems intended to keep it in check were generally overcome mostly as a result of the unexpected formation of ideological factions. Which is to say alliances of people agreeing to work together for their common interest successfully occupying from time to time the selected counterbalance positions thus preventing accountability.

This is the great failing of the American Constitutional system allowing the central power to slowly usurp more and more power overcoming their institutional weaknesses and constitutional limitations.

Maybury vs Madison was actually a good case, It does not represent a usurpation of un-granted constitutional authority because the check of the executive did in fact work.

Other usurpation like the Federal bank bill with its corrupting influence and very long charter are an example of where the American political system fails, as without relatively short sun-setting requirements on every bill, as it allows a temporary majority of interest to bind generations.

While the absence of effective counterbalancing of part's against the same allows the same congress to effectively build a financial political support base abusing the power of the same.

Today most of the abuses of past generations are preserved via theses same mechanisms.

As for the constitution Technically there isn't suppose to be a final word, because the executive is suppose to be able to simply refuse to continue unconstitutional acts at any time. This would be an example of a practical counter-balancing power.

Which congress and past presidents have gotten around by way of creating independent executives.

[goaded]

So you think things like workplace laws, the 40 hour working week, Social Security, Medicare, etc. should sunset every few years?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded None of those domestic polices have any business at the federal level in any way. Even still at the state level I think it is reasonable to require each new legislator to vote to continue any given policy.

Realistically they would just roundel it all together in a big goverment 'shutdown' bill, but at least then we would have the opportunity to review and abandon bad programs.

[goaded]

Congress always has the opportunity to repeal "bad" programs, but it takes a majority to do it. What you want is to give a minority the power to repeal programs they don't like, and that's undemocratic.

How long until Republicans in the House get rid of their speaker in a tantrum again?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded
If that minority happens to be a majority of otherwise self-governing states/subdivision the absolutely they can repeal a program that happens to be harmful to their region as it is implemented for any reason.

It is easy enough for the regions that want this to implement their own version specifically to address their specific problems leaving the other regions alone.

Once again unlike Germany We are a Federal Constitutional republic NOT a democracy!
The consent of the govern is the whole point, not the desires of a mere majority in a few city's who happen to live in an artificial world entirely alien to the rest of the country.

[goaded]

A Federal Constitutional republic is a form of democracy, as is Germany, which is also a Federal Republic, with a constitution, too, look it up. The difference is that it's a parliamentary system that more closely represents the will of the people than your two party system.

For some reason, we don't want another fascist government.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded If you want to call a Federal Constitutional republic a democracy then you can't call it undemocratic because it fails to meet your thus abandoned standard of majority rules.

It undermines the usefulness of the term democracy by merging it with other concepts like constitutional republics, again because now your just saying "generally majority rules"

Frankly i find it rather dishonest to play such word games as your really just confusing people much like people who try to distinguish sex and gender only to go back and conflate them again as a mean of undermining sex.

[goaded]

Then why are you playing word games? Yes, the US is a democracy, and what you're proposing as a supposed "improvement", the sunsetting of essentially all legislation on a regular basis, is simply a ploy to make it easier for a minority to negate what the majority (of representatives and states, not necessarily people) want.

It should take a majority in Congress to overturn a majority decision. The sunset clause on the U. S. Assault Weapons Ban is responsible for most of the major mass shootings since; not just because of the type of weapon, but the magazine size limitations that were included.

Personally, I think holds should be ignored and the filibuster should go back to standing and talking until the clock runs out, not just some idiot saying a word and going home for the night. It was meant to be an extreme action, like impeachment, but Republicans are now putting holds on military promotions, impeaching officials for differences of opinion, and holding impeachment inquiries for a US president based on Russian misinformation.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded I am not playing word games I am trying to accommodate your meaning of the word "democracy" even thou I don't agree with it by distinguishing what is meant.

If a majority of the representatives of The states and their people still agreed with the policy they would have no trouble renewing it. Indeed its almost certain that they would have little trouble renewing it either way most of the time given how we regularly pass 'budget' bills.

That renewal requirement simply gives us the option to re-debate a policy in light of its actual non-uniform effects. How is that not an enormous improvement?
Over everyone simply being made to believe a policy will work out great before trying it.
Only for it to in practice:
1: NEVER be brought up again (in favor of countless new policy ideas of power hungry politicians, as well as current events.)
2: If by some chance it is and just happens to be favorable to one majority but unfavorable to the other it remains in place, regardless of its disparate impact.

The automatic sunsetting of every law is important precisely because America is a Constitutional Republic and not a parliamentary system like Europe where a mere majority (really largest minority) is required.

[goaded]

Yes you are. US democracy works with democratically elected Representatives and Senators, and an elected President. Yes or no?

If you're not going to admit that obvious fact, there's no point in even reading the rest of your post.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Many monarchs in Europe had some kind of democratically elected representative body. That didn't make the democracies. A democracy is where said officials can do whatever they want, which is to say democracies don't have real constitutions.

As such the fact that the U. S. holds 'democratic' elections for said positions does not make the U. S. a democracy by the historic definition.

[goaded]

OK, so you're not going to admit that obvious fact, there's no point in even reading the rest of your post.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded If you had read the post you might have seen in the 2nd line I did in fact acknowledge those positions were elected via 'democratic' elections.

[goaded]

There's no point in reading anything by someone who says that a government made up of democratically elected representatives of the people is not a democracy. It's literally how every democracy in the world works.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Technically that's not how every democracy works, but even if it were the fact that your representatives are elected does not necessarily make you a democracy. To be a democracy those representatives have to have the power to do whatever they want.

[goaded]

Sigh. They need the power to VOTE for whatever they want. They're going to lose votes from time to time. Are you now saying that democratically elected US congresspeople aren't free to vote for whatever they want, to back up your claim that the US is not a democracy?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Nobody ever needs the power to vote for whatever they want. That is just greed for power talking.

The ability to vote for whatever you want is what I would define as a democracy.

[goaded]

So America is a democracy, which is what I've been saying and you've been avoiding.

I think your first sentence is simply obfuscation.

[WindAtMyBack]

He's probably broken the law. So has just about everyone else.

As to which laws he may have broken, I have no idea. At this point in the witch hunt I don't believe a damn thing the Democrats come up with.

[Daniela1982]

@WindAtMyBack They seem to ignore that Biden is breaking immigration law that could result in another 9/11. Time will tell.

[SolitarySolace]

They’ll most definitely blame Trump if another 9/11 event were to happen. They’d probably claim whoever did it did it because of Trump and Texas and MAGA ext attempting to keep terrorists and other dangerous people from coming into our country but they’d claim these people are asylum seekers, ext

[Daniela1982]

Sounds about right.

[SolitarySolace]

Just curious, how do you feel about the majority of women siding with the democrats while majority of men side with MAGA?

[Daniela1982]

Must have to do with abortion. They will side with anyone for it.

[SolitarySolace]

Unfortunately. That’s why I believe women will be the reason this country will meet the same fate as the Roman Empire

[loveslongnails]

He's obviously a criminal, not only by his own actions but by what he's had others do on his behest. (Look up how he swindled Atlantic City).

Trump's own DOJ prosecuted people like Stone, Mannafort and Flynn. These are people who lied to the FBI, courts and Congress on his behalf. Flynn admitted he lied, not once, but twice. Trump pardoned or commuted all their sentences, but not Michael Cohen's, because Cohen told the truth about him. The guy giving the orders is as guilty as the guy who pulled the trigger.

It's pathetically funny that maga's continue to believe that every single person who worked with Trump and quit, or has dirt on him, or knows the truth about him and can bring receipts, is lying and making it all up! LMAO.

So far, he's been convicted in civil court of sexual abuse, defamation, tax fraud, to the tune of over $400 million dollars! The criminal convictions are upcoming.

[Gospeedracer]

He is the victim of endless political witch hunts. Insanely woke democrates can't win elections fairly they need biased main stream media reporting on their side along with coverups, smear campains and straight out election frauds.

[SolitarySolace]

Apparently the democrats also need women because they’re easier to convince than blacks. All they gotta do is blame men for everything and demonize them in political debates such as the abortion debate for example and boom

[dreamstar72]

No way of really telling as what type he is. I’m sure every politician has short changed the laws they make for us to follow, however some are pure evil criminals. Trump does NOT fall into the evil ones, he might be a mild one with taxes, but he loves his country that why he is hated by democrats

[bolverk]

No more that the majority of the now serving politicians in Washington DC. After all how do you think they amassed their multi million $ fortunes when their base salary for congress and senate are $174,000? I'd bet that most of their multi million $ fortunes are accrued through more than a little Insider Trading!!!

[Snakeyes7]

Innocent until proven guilty, unless they actually try to use a criminal trial (not that that trial will be fair anyway, given how Chauvin's went), it is intellectually dishonest to say that he committed a crime.

[Sabretooth]

always has been: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump#:~:text=U.S.%20federal%20government-,1973%20federal%20housing%20suit,the%20operation%20of%2039%20buildings.

[Avicenna]

No, not when Democrats are inventing crimes and abusing the justice system in general

[QuietRunner]

Once every other politican is held to the same legal standards as President Donald Trump then I might consider it. However, once the Clinton Global Initiative has be proven beyond the shadow of doubt that it has restored Haiti to the Empire of Haiti then I'll know justice is equal.

[douride2]

Why do people keep calling him president? I was under the impression that Joe was the president down there. If I remember correctly Donald is the former president. Right?

[SolitarySolace]

Trump is going to be president again in the November. So technically he is still president

[purplepoppy]

Absolutely. His base may think he's been victimised but the rest of the world can see him for what he really is, a criminal.

[normalice]

He admitted his crimes. His defense is that he should be immune to prosecution.

[SolitarySolace]

What did he admit to?

[normalice]

Insurrection, fraud, etc. Does it matter? He could shoot someone in the middle of fifth Avenue and not lose a single supporter.

[SolitarySolace]

1. He never encouraged an insurrection. He didn't tell anyone to go inside of the capital. The bad actions of people aren't on him. If your dog bit someone they don't put you down they put the dog down.

2. What fraud was he convicted of?

3. Why would he shoot someone in the middle of fifth Avenue? 😑 I'm pretty sure he's too busy to do something like that. Plus you really think the man who didn't start any new wars during his presidency would just random shoot someone on the streets? 😂 did your wife tell you she'd withold sex from you or divorce you if you didn't spew pointless hate about Trump?

[normalice]

He encouraged civil war. We all saw it.

I said he admitted it. Not that he was convicted.

If he did it just to prove he wouldn't lose a supporter and said thats the only reason he was doing it, you would still support him.

[SolitarySolace]

Trump and the conservatives wouldn't benefit from a civil war, dumbass. Your side wants to see this country burn to the ground. I mean you're steady burning American flags.

[SolitarySolace]

Already*

[normalice]

No, it's you ragetards who want a civil war. Trump has openly said as much and still has your support.

[handsomelad70]

Is the Pope Catholic? Is water wet? Are our Northern Canadian territories cold in winter? Are buxom babes hot?

[noohair]

Biden is a criminal that is protected you the government. Trump has no protection. If after all these years, this is all they can create? It is law-fare, like warfare.

[Kabluie]

He owes a lot of people money, and hasn't paid. Also if there is a lawsuit, he's losing it.

[jahaims]

99.9% of politicians are criminals and every president ever broke laws to get there.

[SolitarySolace]

Trump isn’t a career politician though

[jahaims]

He broke laws to make his money in order to have the resources to become president.

[SolitarySolace]

What laws did he break?

[jahaims]

His fraudulent university, he had to pay for settlements for and several real estate and construction deals. It is public information if you care to look.

[SolitarySolace]

It’s a university. People don’t have to go to it. Isn’t that what leftists say about their indoctrination colleges?

[austinbooth]

He was a great president

[SolitarySolace]

Putin favors Biden

[SolitarySolace]

www.msn.com/.../ar-BB1ik4D5?ocid=sapphireappshare

[pickles77]

He no more a criminal as than a guy that goes 50 in a 45 mph zone.

[jimmy2]

It takes a convicted and he not
All Democrats you can't convict before a judge a jury
Go back to school

[OtterMan68]

Two words: Trump University

[FunkyMonkee]

No, just Joe Biden and his cohorts.