Should the United Nations be abolished, why, why not?

Question

sawno · Accepted Answer

100%, it's an anti-democratic world government. People don't take it for what it is because its a slow process, but more and more power slowly but surely is given to it until we have no local democracies left. I can't elect anyone in the UN, neither can you, but simultaneously they are now trying to dictate the health policy of the entire world.

Then there is the "Human rights lawyers" issue, nothing against actual proper human rights of course, but it basically means that we have a legal body above our own. Which is an element of a state as well. If we rename it to "Global Enforcement Lawyers" it suddenly becomes a lot more clear why I dislike the idea of it.

So don't think the UN is just a bunch of useless nothingness. It's DESIGNED to be like that. Imagine getting an anti-democratic government that supersedes your own that has 0% power. Of course they would look like a useless entity. The point is that their power growth is a very slow one until we all realize its to late. And they have BEGAN using that power. But not on your individual country level, on a federal state level. The EU negotiates treaty's to give power to the UN, my country surrendered power to the anti-democratic EU and now I automatically loose rights as a citizen and as a voter.

So the sooner the UN is abolished the better, I consider it a very evil entity. And that is me leaving out the whole Lucis Trust satanist ties.

ohsheeT · Accepted Answer

Was done in the right way it was probably be a good thing but from what I see and what I feel

And just because I see it and feel it doesn't mean that I'm right about it but I see our government selling us out are trying to sell us out if they already haven't and the United Nations trying to become one which in America is not going to fly we are American if we had good politicians we would be badass Americans but all we are is bullies on the block and all our politicians have big fat mouths so that means one day we're going to get our ass kicked if we don't wake up

Siri137 · Accepted Answer

It just doesn't seem to be working the way it should. When it was first formed, the need for such an organisation was obvious, but it slowly morphed into just another bloated bureaucracy, another level of government that we just do not need and would be better off without.

Daniela1982 · Accepted Answer

They don't seem to do jack shit. In fact there has been some bad things that their soldiers have done to women instead of helping them. I think they are worthless.

Mr_twoface · Answer

I don't believe it should be abolished, but it should definitely be reformed. The UN has faced challenges in effectively resolving modern conflicts and crises. Reform could enhance its ability to respond more effectively to global conflicts, humanitarian crises, and peacekeeping needs! The current structure of the Security Council reflects the post-World War II global order. I believe it doesn't adequately represent the geopolitical realities of the 21st century! It often seen being paralysed in decision-making since the permanent membership and veto power of the P5 is seen as undemocratic, as it grants disproportionate influence to these countries and does not always reflect the majority view of the international community. The actions are nowadays often influenced by the national interests of its permanent members, rather than the global good. Just look at decisions in current conflicts around the globe!

strateguy632 · Answer

it didn't stop wars in korea nor vietnam. it failed its main purpose. now they just make empty resolutions.

they make a fuss about female genital mutilation but don't use authority to pressure at least member states like egypt etc.

and if can't cut gal then bad to exclude male, where is equality?

always they pretend to have compassion but only for some but exclude others. that is not virtue.

RebelinSteel · Answer

It is needed to have some form of global representation. The current UN is presently over bureaucratic and needs rebuilt. If you do not have a global assembly, how do you prevent countries invading others? There is currently a lot on social media about the US leaving the United Nations, leaving NATO… I wonder which country or countries would benefit. One of the major problems (and there are many) is that countries can contribute troops for cash, however for a large number of countries those troops are very poorly trained and also very poorly paid, some coming from countries that are almost naturally corrupt. The UN has carried out some good work globally and also prevented hostilities breaking out or resulting in the loss of a country. It is by no means perfect but some form of global assembly is required.

TommyMountainFigure · Answer

300+ members have been found to support the terrorist group hamas. So, when they carry out atrocities like the one in Israel on the 7th October, it's clear the UN supports this and calls for ban on Israel's Rights to defend itself!

Shocking. It should be abolished straight away!

Lliam · Answer

Should be abolished. It does  nothing  to create peace in the world. It's purpose is to bring about an unelected, dictatorial, One World Government.

Anonymous · Answer

Kind of a useless organization, always has been. Largely a forum for debate to gain external support, and allow other nations to decide who would support their gaming.

Dargil · Answer

If Trump 47can evict the UN and withdraw from it, he should. They serve no constructive purposes. Zero.

AviatorTom · Answer

The UN is the best global organization we have. It's not perfect, but what could be better?

_no_one_ · Answer

I still dont see their usefulness, might as well save the money and resources

Snakeyes7 · Answer

All they do is attempt to establish a one world government. They have no reason to exist anymore and should be abolished.

JGoesToTown · Answer

I mean, the idea is nice, but in practice, its useless.

soe11 · Answer

Need to be restructured. Need to be reorganised. With new constitution. Total abolition of The veto powers.

WhiteBoyChill · Answer

I dont think so. Its a panel for dialogue and they have done some useful things over the years like security forces and combatting hunger

AngryCarl · Answer

The UN is the world's conscience. Without the UN it would be more of a free-for-all than it already is.

Anonymous · Answer

It shouldn't be abolished, but America shouldn't be part of it.

handsomelad70 · Answer

Nope, because it's our last hope to stave off World War Three.

Anonymous · Answer

Nah, I think it's funny to pretend like we have world unity. That's gotta be worth a few billion a year. Am i right?

Sameone · Answer

Should be abolished

shortster · Answer

Yes, it is objectively terrible

Should the United Nations be abolished, why, why not?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Should the United States defund the United Nations?

Should the United Nations be abolished, why, why not?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Should the United States defund the United Nations?

We're glad to see you liked this post.