So, delay really was the goal all along?

[normalice]

I hate being right all the time about this far right activist Supreme Court. Just once you'd think they'd do something unpredictable to throw everyone off but instead they pretend they really have something to consider in Donald Trump's immunity claim, hold on to it as long as they are legally allowed, and then toss it back to the lower court it came from to give him the delay he needs to prevent a trial before the election. What a joke.

Weird to think if it weren't for Stormy Daniels there are millions of people who legitimately wouldn't know he is a criminal before the election, thanks to our entire federal government seeming to bend over backwards to give him every delay he can think of.

[ProbablyClueless]

Well... in your defense... It's tough to not be right when you perform mental gymnastics that would make Simone Biles look like a quadriplegic

[normalice]

I guess if someone truly discovered a novel brain disease connecting two very simple dots would look like "mental gymnasitcs," sure.

[ProbablyClueless]

Occam's razor. What's more likely; that a court of law is following the law and that the pornstar who admitted to lying is actually lying? Or that a giant conspiracy exists to releect a candidate that they didn't lift a finger to help win before?

[normalice]

Scouts is not reviewing the porn star case. This has nothing to do with that. And what she actually admitted to was being coerced into signing a false disclaimer.

And a conspiracy that makes money is just a business model. Do I think far right billionaires around the world are trying to get the far right billionaire back in charge of the country that is effectively the last line of defense for democracy? I dont have to think that because they openly admit it by donating to his campaign.

[ProbablyClueless]

That was objectively NOT a false disclaimer; it was an NDA which is a very standard part of settlement negotiations. And those billionaires donate to plenty of lefty candidates as well; another very standard practice.

Democracy is about what the people want. If the people want Trump, then that's what they want, and you become the enemy of democracy by trying to deny them what they want.

[normalice]

The NDA was a different thing. She also signed a statement saying she did not have sex with Trump. That's what she admitted she signed falsely.

Far right billionaires do not donate to democrats.

And its different, though admittedly no less valid, when people are tricked into voting against democracy.

[ProbablyClueless]

There's those mental gymnastics! Poor Simone... You vote against democracy every day you support the legal prosecution against Trump.

The validity of the statement that she didn't have sex with Trump is dependent on the validity of the NDA that prompted it. You cannot, by legal definition, be coerced to conform to an agreement you voluntarily entered into; you're simply upholding your end of the agreement.

I don't see why you're so concerned about never being wrong; you seem to be doing a pretty great job of being wrong today.

[normalice]

Those are statements of fact. Sorry if your brain damage makes that seem hard to process.

[ProbablyClueless]

They were incorrect statements

[normalice]

Nope. Sorry you were misinformed.

[ProbablyClueless]

tenor.com/.../wave-simone-biles-olympics-artistic-gymnastics-gymnast-gif-22548764

[normalice]

I understand. You resort to memes to continue to deny reality. I accept that you are fussy about this and are frustrated by the fact that it is true. You don't have to go out of your way to prove it any further.

[Kingofkings1992]

@normalice you deny reality more so than any other person on the site

[normalice]

@Kingofkings1992 I'm not the religious person.

[Anonymous]

You are not right all the time, otherwise you would be able to provide provide citstion of the exact ruling "character matters above all". You are just spreading far left misinformation.

[normalice]

Wrong question, ragetard.

[Opinion Owner]

You said "I hate being right all the time" I pointed out you are not right all the time or you would be able to prove citation of that claim, otherwise, you are not right all the time.

[normalice]

Again, wrong question ragetard.

[Opinion Owner]

You said "I hate being right all the time" in this question. Point is, you are not always right. If you are, prove the citation with that exact ruling. Otherwise you are not always right.

[Opinion Owner]

Thank you GaG bot for thinking my answer was helpful

[Anonymous]

Yeah, we already knew that. They and Judge Cannon are helping hold it all off in hopes he is elected and can throw out all his own charges or pardon himself.

[Still-alive]

Well now that Biden has immunity he should imprison Thomas, alito, fire roberts and kavanaugh and replace them all wth sane scotus members as official acts.

go ahead and fire Aileen cannon too.

[Anonymous]

The Court always releases its most controversial decisions at the end of June. When the leftists had the majority they were just as activist.

[normalice]

Leftists have never had the court. The far right just says they did to trick dumb people into allowing the far right to put activists judges in.

[Anonymous]

Oh you taste so good Mr Biden, taco Tuesdays again you're spoiling me