1, Why is msnbc so low? 2, why is she getting crazy money? 3, did she give a chunk to those victims, who she "got rich off" them?

[strateguy632]

disclaimer, i AM jealous money, but look at the facts n proportion!

estimate around 30 million democrat dnc voters. considering they use *scool style peer pressure and name calling, you would think they would wanna "hear" their opinions...

yet msnbc has around 1 million viewers... past 6 months, only spiking briefly to over 2 million around 6 times n quickly returning to average... but youd think they can hear what they wanna hear there...

all the group-think peer pressure... and even democrats don't watch? why so low?

and then the ads won't get seen by millions... less buy ads means less money, but rachel maddows did attract ratings, highest of channel, with her extremist style of the "party line" that earned...

huge money! reward for spreading libtard talking points to more people... insted of real news n facts. look at the huge reward for drawing the audience!

but the proportion is wild, 1 million out of 30 million people? for that 30 million a year? over 2 million each month can buy a HOUSE each MONTH !

that is crazy huge money. not just a raise , but crazy huge!

with all that huge money... specifically WHEN the agenda has been "talk about victims in Ukraine n gaza" for "whatever" agenda n she represented the agenda the suffering... but how much of that 2 million did actualy GIVE to the people whose suffering she directly benefited from their tragedies but...

how much does she actualy help them herself... she CAN Help... (in contrast to my salary n yours!) she has over 2 million each MONTH but...

all her actress skill is not really wanting to help the ones she talks about , she is just a good actress... and more loyally and passionately "towing" talking the agenda... or is she giving chunks of that gigantic salary to the victims from whom she gets rich?

[Jersey2]

She is popular with Liberal women, probably gay feminists. Anyway, take a look at the attached demographics which adds some interesting insights. It is Pew but I still question some of the data.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/

[Jersey2]

I just realized how old that article and data are. Her demographic is still probably the same, so they have like one outlet for themselves… Maddow. Ick.

[strateguy632]

that is stil helpful.
in "2012", the "Majorities of the Maddow (74%) audiences are Democrats, as are more than half of regular MSNBC viewers (58%)." then we see a rating of 1 million...
out of 30 million democrats, EVEN democrats don't wanna hear that crap, despite "aligning" with democrat party cult movement

[exitseven]

I know that Fix news has more viewers than all the rest. If the fake news put together MSNBC isn't even a real news outlet. Anyone who would hire a no talent hack like Mike Barnicle cannot be serious.

[strateguy632]

correct, fox is "most viewed indicating most trusted" for THREE YEARS in a row, consecutive. "March 2024. This was Fox News’ 38th month on top in primetime and 37th month in first place in total day." cnn lost credibility n viewers and dropped to 600,000 viewers in prime time.

cnn was replaced by ms-dnc 2nd place, with a gap of nearly a million less! fox prime time 2.1mn, far more than msnbc
1.3mn primetime.
in fact fox gained!
compared to its performance in Feb. 2024, Fox News was up +3% in total viewers and +6% in the A25-54 demo during the primetime viewing hours.

[exitseven]

The reruns of Gunsmoke on the Grit channel get better ratings than CNN.

[coachTanthony]

She is a horrific terrible human being.

[strateguy632]

especially considering the liberal emphasis "hypocrit bad" , so talking abourt suffering but getting huge money but not helping those is horrible, multiplied,
can help but doesn't, multiplied
doesn't help despite mouthing off about it , and hypocrisy a "huge sin for liberals" like 9^3 cubed, horrible to the 3rd power!