Are future or continuing wars more possible under Trump or Harris?

[Pterodon]

Trump will cause wars to continue and start more

Harris will cause wars to continue and start more

[NaultD]

Don turning isolation will betray all of our allies. So they will turn coat to Russia or China and use our bases, intelligence, and military capacity of stockpiles abroad to invade the homeland of USA.

We'd still win but trade would be not be a thing so corn and soy beans to eat. maybe chicken and pork for regular people. Straight back to the Victoria ages honestly in terms of commercial goods.

[worldscolide]

Considering under trump there were no new wars, and he made peace with North Korea and the like, I trust Trump to keep us out of war.

[lightbulb27]

Trump wxpressed interest in ending st least one and under him there was i ky the smokdering ones in ukraine and yemen.
Harris we dont know but that admin has had a worse time…

[llorando]

I'd say equally under both. Trump campaigned in 2016 on ending the "stupid wars" only to put war hawk swamp creatures in his cabinet. Biden/Harris administration is basically forcing Ukraine to fight in a avoidable they cannot win.

[DrPepper12]

Trump may not start a hot war but he's guaranteed to start a war with our allies as he has done previously. He has an 2 mm orange hard-on for attacking Iran.

[msc545]

No matter who is in office, we will have wars. The defense contactors run this country.

[Breanna_nonbinary]

Since when does any president start wars?

[Pterodon]

Through weakness

[llorando]

Since the inception of the military industrial complex. Being 38, you should remember when Bush started the Iraq war in a bed of lies.