Life came to the arctic tundra, isn't this horrible and concerning?

1, We know a band of trees grows across the north hemisphere in forests of trees with leaves

North of that is colder so has a band of trees with needles around the world.

North of that is the tundra that is treeless.

2, In 2011 a study found climate change did something very "concerning."

It found a "general trend of increased vegetation" shrank tundra to around 10% of land surface area that is concerning... those plants might eat the co2!

Life came to the arctic! isn't that dreadful? Concerning?

3, If those ADDED plants eat co2 we won't be able to whine about global warming?

4, You ask a chatbot if it changed since 2011.

I would predict we know tundra shrunk. since 2011 more tundra shrunk... estimate same rate but...

but the odd thing this bot is programmed to to make everybody happy.

It tells skeptics like me "ten years later the same amount remained" since 2011, not logical but change takes a long time. So i feel good. Same 10%. I SUSPECTED same.

It adds "some studies may show" changes! That is for the church of global warming can say our faith is true... but won't both sides see the other half?

5, and "they don't show!" Change. The bot said they "may show" change, that i understand...

it depends how twisted the researchers are for their religious fanaticism of the church of global warming. All this is just horrid, isn't it?

Life came to the arctic tundra, isn't this horrible and concerning?
Post Opinion