Do you believe those who debate contemporary issues have an agenda?

I find it funny when there's always got to be some current-day bullshit that shouldn't even be a thing but never anything in the past that's should've been talked about today. For example, the 2010s era was so corrupted most of the movies in that era have fake reviews, especially bad video games, like when Microsoft tried to say Halo 5 Guardians isn't a pay-to-win game but it's actually a pay-to-win game, but strangely enough, there's no news about it at all. I wouldn't be too surprised if people like Elon Musk and Candace Owens simply wanted to divide Gen Z because they knew they were less intelligent and gullible so they could gain more attention. In the meantime, the 2010s created Gen Z in this way; I'm sure those who remember the 2000s and 90s are far smarter than everyone else. While I agree with Musk's right to free speech, I find it odd that he avoids topics that should have been discussed, such as past gaming content that required payment, famous losers who attempted to normalize abusive relationships, and brainwashing Gen Z. But the reason I appreciate watching podcasters like Joe Rogan and moistCr1TiKaL is that they talk about topics in the past as well as what's going on today.
Do you believe those who debate contemporary issues have an agenda?
Do you believe those who debate contemporary issues have an agenda?
Post Opinion