Should people who refuse to obey evacuation orders have their life insurance cancelled or be rescued by taxpayer funded first responders?

[OtterMan68]

They accepted the risks, and should pay the consequences.

They should still get the same benefits as the people who took the warnings seriously and did not risk their lives

A total of 6 votes were cast: 4 girls and 2 guys. See detailed results

[andreasderjuengere]

I will expect that most of those to be rescued will also have paid taxes this way or one other way.

It appears strange to me that in a country that's so proud about its inhabitants' ''freedom'' there are many who attempt to deny this ''freedom'' (to others).

About ''orders'' from an ''authority''... the same.

[OtterMan68]

it comes with consequences.

[Avicenna]

Only for that? Not rescuing them seems a bit heartless unless it’s too dangerous to rescue them.

[bluesparrow]

I think it depends on whether they had one of those fancy electric wheelchairs or the manual ones.

[NathanDavis]

that's what you have contracts for... to screw one, or the other...