If this is Democratic ticket in 2028, are Democrats screwed?

[Anonymous]

Yes

No

[Anonymous]

They had the Bernie Bros which Bernie was good at winning over young men, but the dems called Bernie and his Bernie bros misogynist which caused them to lose more male votes. And Kamala only going on the Call me daddy podcast which only women watch and not going on Joe Rogan was a huge mistake.

The Democrats are behind the times in term of media. In the 1960s you could just talk on the TV, but now they expect a politicaion to show on a podcast, so we can see if they are authentic or just a robot. If you all you do is go on a podcast where they are just going to ask you soft ball questions you're going to get anywhere with that.

[beefcakebradybatson]

AOC/Kaepernick Democratic 2028 ticket !!!

[Asker]

@beefcakebradybatson Fraud squad member for president? No thanks.

[beefcakebradybatson]

Trump's Cabinet will be the Fraud Squad. GO AOC/KAEPERNICK 2028 !!!

[Asker]

@beefcakebradybatson Actually it won't, some of Trump's cabinet picks are surprisingly good. AOC and other members of the fraud squad became frauds when they sold out to the DNC establishment. AOC and others could have used their vote as leverage to get what they wanted, they didn't, instead they fell in line and blindly supported Nancy Pelosi for house speaker

[beefcakebradybatson]

Perhaps they felt they had to surrender to Ms. Pelosi. Still, they'd be a million times better than Despicable Donnie Trump and Just Disgusting Vance !!!

[Asker]

@beefcakebradybatson they didn't have to, they decided to, and have been called out numerous times for selling out. Actually they won't, with Kennedy and others in Trump's cabinet, his second term will be decent.

[onedarkcloud]

@beefcakebradybatson LMAO AOC LOST OVER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS for her constituents in a battle with Amazon over her lack of knowledge about the difference between a TAX AND A TAX BREAK. Amazon withdrew the offer so one hundred million dollars that would have been spent in her area was sent to another location and her constituents lost all the money because of a mathematically crippled bartender. Sound like a good ticket for THE DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA to run on in 2028

[beefcakebradybatson]

@onedarkcloud America will now be run by the RepubliFASCIST Party !!!

[Asker]

@beefcakebradybatson Tell me again which party stated free speech was getting in the way of their agenda?

[Staximus]

A football player and a waitress? All that staring in the mirror is clouding your brain, old man!

[beefcakebradybatson]

@Staximus AOC and Kaepernick will REALLY change America for the better. And with my Golden Boy good looks, my 160+ IQ is STILL WORKING, boyo !!!

[OlderAndWiser]

Hillary is history and Kamala has pissed off most of the power brokers in her party. The Democrats are so blind that they'll probably run another far left candidate and fail again. After 2028, the Democrats may finally see that they are out of touch with the mainstream. . . maybe.

[beefcakebradybatson]

Screw the lamestream;only a true progressive can save America from implosion in the 2030's !!!

[Asker]

@beefcakebradybatson AOC lost the progressive title when she fell in line and supported Pelosi and other establishment Democrats.

[OlderAndWiser]

@beefcakebradybatson The majority of the country does not really want a "progressive" leader but, unfortunately, too many voters are persuaded by the lies spread by the leberal propaganda machine/MSM.

[beefcakebradybatson]

Most voters are seeking a TRUE progressive, NOT a "Third Way" Clinton/Obama/Tony Blair clone who'll whisper sweet nothings to their compatriots while allowing the rich crooks to continue swindling them, OAW.

[MissTrix]

Not really they almost got it! Almost had all the girls having abortions for family planning and not taking our daily pill.

[Gold618]

Don't tell me they still want Hilary (or is it "Hillary"?)?

[Asker]

Sadly yes. There is rumors circulating social media that Hillary will run in 2028 and people are excited.

[Gold618]

Well, at least if they do they're sure to lose again. But what if in 2028 she actually wins? Oh no.

[Asker]

3rd times a charm so it could happen. We're all screwed if Hillary is elected in 2028. If someone like Tulsi were to get the Republican nomination, Hillary probably would lose.

[paledreams]

I like Hillary or Hilary :) Mrs Clinton was awesome and is awesome 😎👍🏻 enough. Awesome enough 😀

[paledreams]

I'm still sad I never got Sarah Palin for a President or even Sarah Palin for Vice President. However I'm not Americano, so it's not like politics there affects me in any real way politically

[Asker]

@paledreams Hillary is an evil, warmongering witch that is responsible for Lybian slave markets.

[Gold618]

@paledreams I don't understand how you can say that someone who openly laughs at someone's violent death (Gadaffi) is "awesome". She's clearly an unhinged psychopath.

[genericname85]

unless the dems stop focusing on angry minorities while neglecting all the big majortiy groups in the country (men, white people, heterosexual people), they won't get another chance i think. not unless trump massively fucks up shit which is not so likely.

[lightbulb27]

4 years is a long time.

assuming we are still alive...

yes, that is a terrible Prez/VP combo.

Might be better off with Jamie Dimon and some of the other democrat leaning billionaires that see "re-distribution" of wealth as a virtue.

[zagor]

Hilary won't run again. Harris won't get the nomination again. They need some new faces, and not the current "big names".

[Asker]

Let's hope your right. DNC screwed up big time handing the nomination to Harris.

[zagor]

Yeah though it was so late in the game there wasn't much that could be done. Joe should have ducked out in Sept. '23.

[Asker]

Even if Harris was handed the nomination early in the election, she still would have lost, she was a terrible campaigner with a unlikeable personality. What Democrats should have done was held a legit primary allowing voters to choose who got the nomination instead of party leaders.

[exitseven]

Absolutely not. This is the Dream Team of politics. A combination of charisma, experience and American values.

[Red_Arrow]

Hillary will be 81 by then and way too old to run. Trump is now 78 and his senility is really beginning to show. In 2028. even staunch Trump followers will realize what a mistake it was electing him and a democratic ticket will be welcomed. Kamala would have a great shot at the presidency.

[Dargil]

Nope. Democrats will introspect and come up with a fresh moderate face. They will have to have a policy preferable to what JD Vance offers. To outdo him.

[Kelley1]

That will not be who is running in 2028. Harris lost and will fade into obscurity.

[JesseP1nk]

Democrats are gonna lose 2028 too. Why do i think that? Because they still dont understand why they lost to Trump and they blame voters instead of their bs policies. And if you point out their faults then they are gonna attack you and call you a Trump supporter.

[onedarkcloud]

Dumb and dumber. And if THE DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA tries to put them on their ticket they are dumber than both of them put together.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

yes, though judging by all the hell Biden has done these past 4 years I dont think any democrat would be winning an election for quite a while

[seeyounexttuesday]

We need to take a fucking rest from tickets and presidential elections.

[Jerre]

I meant hit yes. No chance I the world of those two idiots becoming President.

[Jerre]

Thank you for the Like

[AviatorTom]

How do you tell which one is the President? There would be lots of cat fighting.

[Asker]

Easy, the who has thoughts commiting suicide by shooting themselves 5 times in the back of the head is the VP candidate.

[Anonymous]

Neither will run again. Trump is under the delusion that he's a permanent fixture.

[DryGermanGuy]

What? No Michelle Obama? 🙄🙄🙄

[Asker]

Michelle has already stated she has no interest in Running for president.

[DryGermanGuy]

No kidding!!! But the then 81 year old Clinton would make sense, huh?

[Asker]

No she wouldn't, but Clinton doesn't care about making sense, she only cares about herself.

[BCRanger10]

Beyond.

[Twalli]

It won't be.