Why weren't white people allowed to choose whether or not they wanted immigration into their countries?

[Anonymous]

I don't want to hear about how great multiculturalism is for white people. I want to hear why you think that whites and only whites shouldn't be allowed to choose?

[KostasKouvalis]

We CAN by voting. And a lot of White people are starting to elect leaders that are opposed to immigration. So the issue is more that others believe every race can have a region for themselves except Whites. And I actually have an answer to your question.

I was having a discussion here a few days ago with some black nationalist, and I brought up how there are black Africans who believe Whites have no right to live in Africa, but Africans have a right to live in Europe.

She basically told me, they have a right to be hypocrites, because Whites colonized and enslaved them and stole their resources, but they didn't do the same to us. So because we harmed them in the past, we basically owe them a piece of the pie now. This is basically their way of settling the score.

[Asker]

I bet she believes blacks should never be held to account for any of their wrong doings as far as she is concerned. It's all part of their race Hussle, You can vote but our leaders will never do what you want unless you hold them to account. Western political systems are corrupt and broken.

[phraseology]

Because the World Economic Forum (Nazi Party) wants White people mad at all the minorities so that a final solution can be pushed forward to eliminate all minorities from the gene people. The minorities were dumb enough to go along with the plan thinking the Nazi Party really cared about them, and as a result they have stain their reputations and many people are less sympathetic toward them now. Lucky for the minorities, most White people are smart enough to see through the Nazi Party's plan, even though all the minorities failed miserably. Thus they get to live for the time being even if they look like complete morons that got played like pawns.

[phraseology]

*stained

[Asker]

@phraseology I don't hear a lot of hate for minorities living in their own countries. Even the christchurch shooter in his manifesto said he didn't hate muslims in muslim countries.

[phraseology]

Socialism is about control and world conquest, so what is their country and the socialist country changes over time. Eventually it comes knocking for the current victim of the collectivists. When that day comes, all the sudden those people in that other country that were not a problem yesterday, all the sudden are the main event today.

[exitseven]

In America Asians were brought in to work on the railroads and there were plenty of Hispanic farm workers. It was white people that wanted them. Cheap labor is the reason. It is still going on. I boycott Tyson foods because they fired all their American workers when Biden let in all the illegals.

Biden and the democrats are letting in the illegal aliens because they need the votes. It is more an issue between taxpayers and democrat politicians than it is white VS. non whites.

The American people overwhelmingly want mass deportations yet democrat politicians say they will fight President Trump and will refuse to cooperate with ICE.

[Asker]

@exitseven I think most whites want mass deportations and most elites want illegals.

[exitseven]

. All Americans , white, black it makes no difference. Taxpayers are fed up with seeing their hard earned money wasted.

[Asker]

@exitseven Well white countries are expected to take in everyone even if it destroys everything we built, Whites can't have a place of their own and that matters to more than most of us.

[Astarlessnightsky]

They were.

Most European and North American countries desperately needed immigtants, espacially after the World Wars.

Germany for example had several waves where they desperately begged other countries to sent immigrants when the german industry desperately needed workers.

[Asker]

In Australia the leaders all agreed that immigration was too complicated for the public to vote on so they decided for us. they knew we hated it. they knew our soldiers who fought and died for the country would never had done so if we were only going to give it away.

[Syntosi]

Because 1: You already decided to allow it and 2: Refusing it is dumb.

Most "White countries" are what is called a "Representative Democracy". That means that the people vote to elect a representative amongst themselves to act in matters of state in the interest of those who elected them. In other words, they use their own judgement to make decisions for you because you entrusted them with your vote. Yes, this is also true if the person you did not vote for win, they are still YOUR representative.

In other words, if your representative allows immigration into your country then they are doing so with YOUR blessings.

But yeah. The reason why every modern country allows this is because its important for national growth. Only idiots tries to prevent it.

[Asker]

A Representative Democracy or elective Democracy is when citizens elect a leaders to represent the interests of the people. When they all know what the people hate but break their promises and do it anyway then it is an elective dictatorship. this is why every Representative Democracy needs Political accountability.

[Syntosi]

That is nonsense. Representatives are not obliged to follow any promises they make. They are not your rubber stamp that just approves things you have already come to an agreement upon. Rather they are person you "employ" to make decisions for you. Politicians making promises to you or whatever is just political games.

And yes, it is better this way and not just a simple "oversight". To make an easy example, representatives must be unburdened of responsibilities in case the situation changes. If for example a politician promises to make closer ties to another nation and during their term they go to war then the politician must respond to that rather than naively try to get along with their literal enemy.

This is what you are actually supposed to be voting on; people who you trust to actually have your best interest in mind. If you fuck up and elect another corrupt politician or whatever then that is your fault, not theirs strictly speaking. It is your responsibility to vote responsibly on people who are actually qualified.

[Asker]

so we weren't allowed to choose and politicians are allowed to betray us and the people who fought and died for us as far as your concerned. what ever suites your agenda then i guess.

[Syntosi]

You are supposed to choose representatives that does not betray you. It is your own failing that results in electing someone untrustworthy or unsuitable to hold that power. You are supposed to judge their character and capability and if you dont, you will suffer the consequences of your neglect.

[Asker]

@Syntosi If A parent in good faith leaves a child with an abusive babysitter and that child is murdered as a result you could make an argument against the parents better judgement but that babysitter is much more at fault and deserves the greater punishment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-NaN1ujo_0

[Syntosi]

If you are an owner of a school and you keep employing rapists and murderers then perhaps you are the problem. Just saying.

[Asker]

@syntosi So punishing me and lets the rapists and murders go free in that case seems right to you?

[Syntosi]

They are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, it is also your job as a voter to punish those who tries to abuse the system by not voting for them.

[Asker]

Well your saying that they are Mutually exclusive by focusing on the punishing the trustful person with impaired judgement rather the monsters themselves.

[Syntosi]

You can punish the monsters if you want as well, but you are living in a democracy. You have a lot of power, and with that power comes responsibility. If you neglect your responsibility to the country then that is your fault.

[Asker]

this is a stupid argument

[Syntosi]

Why? Do you think that the right to vote does not come with the responsibility to use that power responsibly? By using your vote recklessly you can send the nation to its destruction you know.

[jshm2]

The do, dumbass. But they call themselves "ex-pats" instead of "immigrants".

[Asker]

What are you talking about?

[Dargil]

Its not race. Its culture.

[beefcakebradybatson]

Racist much, bucko?

[Asker]

compared to who you? are you going to answer the question?

[beefcakebradybatson]

Compared to ME when most of my buddies are white and I LOVE buxom blondes? You're the ones who want a Whitopia, boyo !!!

[Asker]

Those blonds will go extinct if you have kids with them. I want Blondes to exist in the future don't you too?

[Anonymous]

What continent started out purely white?