Who are these "pranksters" fans?

[OddBeMe]

This ahole got caught filming himself spraying raid all over produce in a grocery.

I read about the surmountable trash-tubers in Russia who literally get donations to beat up women. Is this the US's future?

Gotta be some sadistic fcks who watch this sht.

[Sevenpointfive]

how is this a prank? no one but him and his followers are going to know. i can see it being more of a protest against insecticides/pesticides being used on produce. but i'd still kick the shit out of him because he's an idiot.

so, they can try to ban tiktok because it's chinese but they can't ban youtube? why? tiktok is dancing and some sexuality. youtube is copyright infringement and mostly idiots. both apps kill people and ruin lives!

oh, right... google owns youtube and they won't let you take it away.

[jshm2]

To be fair, it's a good lesson on why you should always wash produce before eating. That Russia stunt is mostly bullshit.

As for watchers, you will get people who will watch anything that makes them "feel". So the important thing is why "hot shit, you" cannot make anyone feel, but they can.

[OddBeMe]

True but germwarfare shouldn't be a worry for shoppers. Lol

[petitedollbabee]

It’s mostly young kids (12 & under) watching these channels. Especially young boys. They think it’s funny when it’s labeled as a prank, and they view these men as role models. At the end of the day, parents of these kids are responsible for monitoring what their kids are watching, and as long as kids keep supporting these channels, they’re going to continue to spew out dumbass content like this.

[OddBeMe]

Should be a social media movement to beat these kids asses

[purplepoppy]

Being a prank isn't a defence in court nor will it protect you from a good kicking. I can only imagine its other low lives that watch these idiots.

[dustybiker2]

You're comparing sane justice systems to the American justice system though...

[Jersey2]

His so called prank could have killed people, young and old. Calling it a prank is not right. It was a deliberate attempt to hurt or kill.

‘’Do you also think lighting the woman on fire on the subway was a plank? I’ll be you do.

[dustybiker2]

It happened the last time he was in office.
This will be worse.
People vote for people who they think will let them do what they want.

[dustybiker2]

On another side note
The US approve far worse.. imagine what they spray before shipping these items to stores.
They approve for sale things such as Gain and the like laundry detergents proven to cause pancreatic and other cancers. So a guy with a can of raid is hardly the only bad guy here.

[ProbablyClueless]

My understanding is that their audiences are usually pretty small (thankfully).

Spraying RAID on food like that could kill someone.

[Anonymous]

Why would you look at some dumb shit in Russia and assume it's "the next thing" in the US?

[OddBeMe]

Because several russian stooges are about to be in WH

[Opinion Owner]

Who are they, specifically? And what evidence do you have? Again, please be very specific.

And sorry, MSNBC and CNN don't count.

[OddBeMe]

www.wsj.com/.../musk-putin-secret-conversations-37e1c187

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/42139

dakotafreepress.com/.../

www.politico.com/.../john-ratcliffe-hillary-clinton-russia-423022

www.the-independent.com/.../...syria-b2653673.html

lamag.com/.../rfk-jr-repeats-russian-propaganda

[Opinion Owner]

Thanks for taking 3 - 5 minutes to dig up and share your evidence. I'll address them individually.

WSJ - I didn't read the article because I don't subscribe. I suspect you also don't and you didn't read it ether because you just did a quick Google search and copied the URLs from all the ones that popped up that you thought, based on the headlines, might support your claims. Check.

Kyiv Post - literally the only thing I see in this article that you might have latched onto (IF you actually read it) as "proof" of your claim is the one Trump quote that everyone knows by now was taken out of context by the legacy media and spun into something it clearly wasn't intended to be. Check.

Dakota Free Press - the author of this article is so obviously liberally biased it's comical. He took every comment from Noem and spun it, as his ilk (and you) do at every opportunity, to paint her as pro-Russia. Noem's views, although I don't agree with some of them, are clearly focused on long-term consequences of US decisions, maintaining stability in Europe and avoiding war. Nothing pro-Russia. Check.

Politico - sorry, but conflating Ratcliffe declassifying a report on Clinton's failed attempt to tie Trump to Putin with being a "Russian stooge" is absurd. He was exposing Clinton, and rightly so, nothing more. Check.

[Opinion Owner]

The Independent - this article is a cesspool of MSNB-style rhetoric, obviously drawing heavily from the DNC talking points published as part of the Gabbard smear campaign. Gabbard asked a valid question. The end. It's amazing to me how gullible some people can be in their quest for tidbits of rhetoric to feed their confirmation bias. Check.

LA Mag - how do ANY of RFK's comments quoted here make him a "Russian stooge". Some of his might be unfounded, but a Russian stooge? That's a huge leap. Please justify your claim. Check.

In the end, the links you found in your 3 minute Google search, and you posting them without actually reading them first, is just more proof that you're exactly what I've know you to be for years. Taking legacy media headlines, which already take quotes out of context to support a political agenda, and blindly reposting them to support your own political agenda, is just a symptom of the illness that has controlled the left for years and infected the minds of shallow, naive lefties like yourself. Perhaps science can take the technology developed for the RNA vaccines and develop one that will protect our youth from being infected by the same mind virus so many people are afflicted with. One can only hope.

The good news is, it's curable. I was cured, as have many people I know who voted Biden in 2020 and Trump this year. There is hope for people like you. But the first step, and it's a biggie, is acknowledging your illness. That takes honesty, so sadly I think you're fucked.

[OddBeMe]

Yes the fact that we have Americans who are willing to give up a peice of Ukraine to a fascist is disturbing.

What part of america would you give up?

[Opinion Owner]

Wow, is that really all you've got?

[OddBeMe]

You basically said the sites were fake news. I have no answer for that stupidity

[Opinion Owner]

You did a 3 minute Google search and copied/pasted links without actually reading them first. I ACTUALLY read your links and gave you a lot of detail about why they were fake news. Do you have the intelligence to do ANY sore of due diligence and respond with anything of value? It seems the answer is no. Care to prove me wrong?

[OddBeMe]

You’re either too stupid to realize the connection or have cognitive dissonance. Each link showed how trumps incoming cabinet either wants to pull back on funding Ukraine, or downright supports Putins claims over Ukraine sovereign territory.

[Opinion Owner]

I gave you specific reason why the links do not suggest what you say they do. Care to counter my arguments, or are you going to take the usual liberal pass?

[OddBeMe]

They’re bullshit. Either you said it’s liberal biased.., when you clearly you are. Russians are all over the Republican Party. Dems don’t need to do anything to tie Putin to trump.

[Opinion Owner]

Provide some actual evidence for a change. Otherwise you're exactly whet everyone here already knows you are... a liar.

[OddBeMe]

Sigh…I did and you called fake news. It’s not like these fcks hide their ties to Russia.

[Opinion Owner]

No, you didn't. You did a quick Google search and posted the headlines, nothing more. You didn't even both to read what you posted.

I gave you specifics, and I asked YOU to post specifics, and you have utterly failed. Unless you're willing to engage in an actual conversation that involves more than copied/pasted headlines, just fuck off and stop wasting my time.

[OddBeMe]

Yiu didn't actually. You seem to think parroting russian propo and releasing noncredible russian intel isn't being "pro russia" .

Your ideology has blinded you.

[Opinion Owner]

The irony of that comment coming from you is fucking hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.

[OddBeMe]

I love right wingers assume they won an argument.

[Opinion Owner]

Thanks again for the laugh. You are always good for that, have been for years. Comedy at it's finest.

[OddBeMe]

Oh hey this is still going. Have any proof those trump staffers weren't on Russian payroll when they went to jail? Like a dozen on one candidate's staff?

[Opinion Owner]

Sorry dumbass, but the onus is on you here, not me. I proved you wrong by debunking every single one of the source you provided, and asked you to offer some ACTUAL evidence of your bullshits claims, which you have clearly been incapable of providing. I'm still waiting for you to do that. If you can't, which is clearly the case, just go fuck off to your safe space.

[OddBeMe]

You didn't. 12 people from trumps 2016 team were sent to prison based on this. It's... fact...

[4ngelic]

mainly boys aged 8 to 20