Agree
Disagree
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Glad 92% disagree.
kids are to be loved and protected. They also need to be raised.
but most nowadays are birthed by adult kids.. so they don’t want responsibilities.
they don’t have freedom or “rights”.
funny… don’t agree if kids are giving food stamp that means parents give up their rights to be with this child? So this child can be send off to factories? What a great society.
As long as they can only be redeemed for proper food and not junk food and sweets then yes. In fact it would be better if parents just picked up a free ready made basket once a week.
It's better to follow the old adage...
If you give a man a fish, he will eat it, and then want more fish. If you teach a man to fish, he will eat whenever he needs to, and be able to feed others.
I think dead-beat parents should take care of their own offspring. We shouldn't even have a food stamps program. It's not fair to people who actually work for a living.
Opinion
9Opinion
Yes. At school. No kid should have to pay for food when attendence is compulsory
DEFINITELY NOT wealthy or upper middle class kids !!!
Welthy folk can afford to feed their kids !!!
Like I care !!!
Agree
I don't want kids myself, but that doesn't mean other kids shouldn't be fed
So your tax dollars should be given to Beyonce's child for food? How does that make sense?
Found a commie.
Can you explain your reasoning?
How will these children obtain this food? It's not like children, especially younger ones can get themselves to the store to spend their food stamps. Face it, children need adults for their survival. It sounds like you must have had terrible parents.
So, a baby that lives down the street from a store can just stroll on down there and go shopping? You sound like a whack job.
That might be your experience, but it isn't for every child. I raised 2 sons. Both ate like crazy during their teen years. We joked about it, but our kitchen always had plenty of food and they knew they were welcome to have whatever they wanted, however much they wanted. If you're saying that parents can't be trusted to care for their children, then you should just be advocating for every child to be taken at birth because a parent that can't provide the most basic care (food) certainly isn't providing the more difficult things (time, attention, affection). My advice, don't assume your childhood is a reflection on all parents.
And you think they'd make better food choices if left to choose for themselves? Most kids that eat junk food do so because their parents are too lazy to not give in when the kids want crap. It's easier to give them what they want.
Clearly you don't know much about kids. If left to make their own choices, most kids will go for over processed, sugar filled junk.
realistically if I would've been able to choose anything I wanted to eat, it would've been cheese, berries, a cup of milk, some steak (kids love red colored food. ask them). not a damn cheese sandwich with a bowl of tomato soup with crackers in it. when my nephews visit me, they see bananas on my table and ask me for bananas. not a can of coke or a tablespoon of white sugar
Sugar absolutely is junk. And with that I know you're a retarded troll.
You don't know how anything works
If they are poor yes.
What about the children of millionaires? Yrsssss.
Troll !!! blocked and muted
Nope.
Nu, it's bs
Communism?
Socialism?
Great idea
You can also add your opinion below!