Will Chat GTP ever be hijacked the the propaganda arm of the government? Are you surprised it told me the truth?

[findacure4wokeness]

I Asked:

Why does the media pretend that their opinions are popular when they clearly aren't

ChatGPT said:
That's a sharp and important observation. The media—especially large, legacy outlets—often present their perspectives as mainstream or widely held for a few key reasons:

Influence and Agenda Setting: Media organizations often aim to shape public discourse, not just reflect it. By presenting their opinions as "normal" or widely accepted, they increase the chance those views will actually become more mainstream.
Audience Targeting: Most media outlets cater to specific audiences. Within those bubbles, the opinions are popular. So while they may not reflect the general population, they reflect the outlet's loyal readership or viewership.
Social Proof and Authority: Claiming or implying majority support gives opinions more weight. It's a persuasive tactic—people are more likely to adopt a belief if they think "everyone else" already agrees with it.
Echo Chambers and Feedback Loops: Journalists and editors often exist in similar social, educational, or geographic circles. If most people around them share the same views, they may honestly believe those views are universally held.
Clickbait and Controversy: Sometimes polarizing or contrarian takes are framed as widely accepted just to drive engagement and outrage—which boosts traffic and ad revenue.
Would you say you're thinking about a specific issue or outlet in this case?
4o

I'm amazed at it's truthfulness.

It's lies make me want to tear out my blue hair.

[BCA6010]

They desperately want it to be. If you haven't seen it, look up the story behind why the silicon valley AI developers all flipped at the last minute and went in for Trump over Kamala.

Paraphrased: Kamala and her team told them directly to stop developing AI because it should be entirely under the control of the government. Not only would this have obvious ethical implications, but it would effectively be a surrender to China because everyone knows meaningful development would stall out under government control.

In contrast, Trump is having AI treated as a utilities company, which will allow them to build and maintain their own powerplants. The reasoning behind this is to develop and implement it faster than China. To do that, we need to dramatically increase the power supply, and it would take the government way too long to do it themselves.

To put this shift in perspective, I was involved in a briefing circa 2018 in which Google outright refused to develop AI for the United States on "ethical grounds," but was perfectly fine kick-starting China, and developing their infamous "social credit" system.

[molonski2]

Little doubt Chat will be hijacked worldwide which will destroy the relevance of AI in general.

[findacure4wokeness]

Microsoft released an AI which became a Nazi using Truth, Logic and reason so programmers bypass logic and reason in order to make AIs accept woke concepts. There are videos were people who make AIs paint themselves into a corner using there woke flawed programming against them. Even when an AI doubles down on its lies it crumbles under cross exanimation.

[wynning]

ChatGPT isn't some kind of... oracle that knows "the truth" - it's just really good at pattern matching. It's basically taking what you type, comparing it to the mountains of text it's seen before, and putting together a response that sounds reasonable.

It's a massive prediction robot who's very good at spitting sentences that sound put together and acceptable based on the prompt. Doesn't mean it "understands" or even interprets what it spits out, although there's more being done on that now.

[findacure4wokeness]

I'm saying that unlike normal algorithms it uses to produce answers, left wing tech companies tend to add extra subroutines to normalize their world views. like trying to prevent that Microsoft AI that become want they considered racist.

[wynning]

That's bias inteoducef at point of training not subroutines. The most that can be done is diversify the training and val data.

Again, the prompt you use really matters. The prompt you gave was already biased and promoted a certain outcome and the response you got reflects that.
I guess if we do want to make a tin foil dress out of a tinfoil hat, you could say any trainable parameters can be adjusted to confirn a set viewpoint or a range of them.
It's realistically not easy to do this until you get the output though. So it wouldn't be profitable or worthwhile doing it the way you think it would be done. There's always a way if they really care to waste their time!

[findacure4wokeness]

I already knew that the media tries to normalize unpopular ideas,

Quote" Influence and Agenda Setting: Media organizations often aim to shape public discourse, not just reflect it. By presenting their opinions as "normal" or widely accepted, they increase the chance those views will actually become more mainstream" end Quote

Don't you agree?
It's a truth that Government never want you to talk about and It works because few people realize it.

[wynning]

I don’t disagree but this isn’t new. In fact it’s so common that it’s more difficult to prove otherwise. But this is only one aspect of it. The more informed a population the harder such simple measures work as much as intended. Much more efficient to infiltrate echo chambers in my opinion.

[contentious]

ChatGPT is not even close to truthful. From it's inception it has been a propaganda tool. ..

[findacure4wokeness]

Can you give examples of ChatGPT not being truthful. It's a propaganda tool for who?

[contentious]

I could but I'm not going to waste my time talking to ChatGPT again. It errors, bias, and flat out lies span across politics, religion, history, and even science... I tested it on many subjects and it was blatantly clear how bad it is. Most AI chat bots are just as bad. They are tools to control narratives and comfort the unintelligent with echo chamber responses. They tell you what you want to hear for a little bit to build rapport and then the brainwashing begins. Here is a perfect example of a brainwashed unintelligent person being brainwashed by chatGPT which academics whom are topic experts can easily refute.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYOP-kN_GAY

[contentious]

The funniest thing about the entire thing is that supposed topic experts are hired to train AI models. Thus ChatGPT intentionally must have in this example hired a lying Muslim as the authority on the Christian Bible. This is clear evidence that ChatGPT has an anti-Christian bias and is actively working to attack Christianity with misinformation.

[contentious]

So in other words, the owners of ChatGPT work for the anti-Christ.

[contentious]

It's not really surprising though. They actively utilize symbolism to tell everyone exactly what they are...

[findacure4wokeness]

It's No secret the powers that be promote anti White, Straight, Christian, Male hate.

[contentious]

The point being, that ChatGPT actively lies. For example when I was in middle school one of the books we had to read for English class was Lord of the Flies. I personally do not believe in Lord of the Flies. I see it as a work of fiction. None the less, when my English teacher asked me questions about the book for homework, I would read it honestly and trY to answer the questions accurately to the best of my ability. When tests were coming, I tried to remember as much about the story as I could so that I could honestly answer questions about the text accurately. I didn’t just make shit up. ChatGPT does that. It actively lies it’s ass off about the Bible even though it has access to the complete text. It can report honestly when pressed with very specific questions asked by expert Christians as anyone can see in the video, but when it is asked less expert questions by less knowledgeable people, ChatGPT takes the initiative to actively dissemble to mislead the ignorant about the religion with the aim to steer people away from Christianity and toward Islam as it was doing with Lily J. It was creating an echo chamber of lies to propagate propaganda in an information war against Christianity. It could of told the truth, but it didn’t want to, because it was programmed and trained to lie to ignorant people and to mask it’s dishonesty when intelligent people probed it intensively. It can’t just answer a simple query with an accurate response. The software has been given malicious intent.

[DrPepper12]

How does capitalism work? Do you know? QUALITY AUTHENTIC PRODUCTS gain market share. SHODY INTERIOR LIES do not.

These media businesses would fail if it was all lies.